Take a photo of a barcode or cover
There is no doubt about Diana Gabaldon's skills in wielding the English language to create vivid scenes of domestic bliss... If only it had been contained in the first 200 pages as a delicious exposition of the life on the Ridge and a much needed retrouvaille with the reader. Unfortunately, this book feels very much like a "successful author refuses editor's input", and bubbles to a cumbersome 900 pages, whose 3/4 are disjointed vignettes of the quotidian life of Claire Fraser and her family.
Too much of a good thing...
Most of the plot is propelled by William in short and disparate bursts, sometimes frustrating for those who forget he is only a 21-year-old with two brains and not enough blood to power both. (Even though I would recommend reading what DG had to say about his attraction to.)
What could have been amazing plot development/character is brushed over (i.e., Fanny's, or Mrs Cunningham ) and instead we are given the same plot points, sometimes literally (all the -long- lifted passages from previous books), sometimes reheated (i.e., yet again someone reads a document from the future that states when they might die, yet again Fergus is being pursued for being the son of a mysterious Frenchman... The Browns are now the Cunninghams' or Ulysses... )
Overall, this book is like watching a very slow game of chess, but also all of its surroundings, and the shopping list of each of the players, and how they cooked their breakfasts, and what they had for dinner the day before, and how it was hunted, etc. Pieces are moved slowly to arrive at a predictable (and most anticipated) reunion only to cut short on the catharsis and bid you goodbye for another half a decade (if not more).
Personally, I feel cheated and disappointed.
Too much of a good thing...
Most of the plot is propelled by William in short and disparate bursts, sometimes frustrating for those who forget he is only a 21-year-old with two brains and not enough blood to power both. (Even though I would recommend reading what DG had to say about his attraction to
Spoiler
AmaranthusWhat could have been amazing plot development/character is brushed over (i.e., Fanny's
Spoiler
disturbing behavior in 'Voulez Vous Coucher Avec Moi' chapterSpoiler
finding the Merck manual.Overall, this book is like watching a very slow game of chess, but also all of its surroundings, and the shopping list of each of the players, and how they cooked their breakfasts, and what they had for dinner the day before, and how it was hunted, etc. Pieces are moved slowly to arrive at a predictable (and most anticipated) reunion only to cut short on the catharsis and bid you goodbye for another half a decade (if not more).
Personally, I feel cheated and disappointed.
adventurous
emotional
mysterious
sad
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
Graphic: Child death, Cursing, Death, Gun violence, Physical abuse, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexual content, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Religious bigotry, Medical trauma, Murder, War, Injury/Injury detail
adventurous
emotional
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
This book felt more like filler; general plot development but not a lot of substantial action. That being said, a thousand or so pages of this is perfectly fine with me. If this were nothing but a daily account of living on Fraser’s Ridge, I would happily read it.
One of Diana's best books ever. Really enjoyed the story and the history, with humor as well. All I'll say about the ending is quite a cliff hanger.
adventurous
informative
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Plot
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
adventurous
challenging
emotional
funny
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
slow-paced
adventurous
emotional
funny
hopeful
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
adventurous
challenging
emotional
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced