Reviews with content warning for Racism - A Game of Thrones

Reviews tagging 'Racism'

A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin

7 reviews

jenmaysiereads's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark sad tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

4.5 out of 5 stars

‘A Song of Ice and Fire’ is a deeply special series for a whole host of reasons, having helped shape the very landscape of modern fantasy for generations of readers.

The story is most-known, most-loved and most-reviled through its fault riddled HBO adaptation named after the first instalment in this series. But the adaptation is a pale, disfigured comparison to the source material.

In reality, George R. R. Martin’s ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’ is a sprawling, captivating high fantasy which follows a cast of deeply flawed, deeply compelling protagonists, antagonists and everything in-between. It is a story I have been wholly captivated and obsessed with for the better part of a decade.

As a teen, I would scour the ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’ wiki between seasons, reading through pages and pages of lore on the world that Martin had crafted, scribbling half-baked theories into a notebook — to the point where I’d read the books without ever actually reading them. This is now my second full read of the first instalment ‘A Game of Thrones’ — though I’ve periodically re-read chapters over the years — and god it is as good as I remembered, if not better.

In the battle for the throne, no one is safe, not even the virtuous ones; oftentimes the good and honourable men frequently suffer all the more. The sense of unpredictability and danger sparked from Martin’s freedom to hurt and kill off the crucial main characters in the series—after making his readers care for them—brings an intensity to the storytelling which is seldom found elsewhere.

The world-building in ‘A Game of Thrones’ is subtle in its beauty and its storytelling. With kernels of information drip-fed to the reader in an organic and captivating manner, the book so rarely dumps exposition onto the reader; and if/when it does, it is well earned. Mostly, the world is taught through the protagonist surviving it. The reader learns of Valyrian steel through the introduction of the ancestral greatsword Ice, they discover the ancient magic of the Stark’s blood through their connection with the direwolf pups and feel the loss of the dragons of old Valyria through Daenerys’ trauma.

It’s fascinating to me that readers talk about ‘A Game of Thrones’ is an anti-fantasy when it is one of the most complex and fascinating magical worlds one can read. It’s just subtle and clever in its storytelling. The magic is unfolding, awakening as the pages turn.

The prose is captivating in its simplicity and beauty. Never veering into overt purple prose, Martin’s skill with the written word is a beast to behold. There is a magic in the way he writes; how he effuses the simplest sentences with such poetry. There is a grandiose and majesty to paragraphs like: “As Daenerys Targaryen rose to her feet, her black hissed, pale smoke venting from its mouth and nostrils. The other two pulled away from her breasts and added their voices to the call, translucent wings unfolding and stirring the air, and for the first time in hundreds of years, the night came alive with the music of dragons.” In such simple language, Martin leaves the reader with a sense of wonder that is almost heart-stopping.

Likewise, Martin utilities the tool of alternating perspectives perfectly. Oftentimes, an off-the-cuff comment from a side character in one chapter has the potential to resolve the conflict experienced by the protagonist of another — if only they had been there to hear it said. There are several instances of this occurring throughout the book, interweaving the plot lines of characters that are hundreds of miles from one another.

The characterisation is so strong with each perspective.

Stylistically, Martin’s prose and tone remains the same however he is able to invigorate each character with a distinct voice that makes it clear who the narrative is following. It’s hard not to become invested in the characters Martin has crafted here: even those which are deliberately unlikable are fascinatingly complex, making you root for them in spite of yourself. For me, the stand-out characters are Daenerys, Jon, Catelyn, Tyrion and Sansa. Not only does this book give a fascinating insight into their characters and their motivations, it shows just how clever, funny, cruel and kind all three are — the depth of which is lacking when it comes to their on-screen counterpoints. Personally, I am a Sansa apologist — that little girl can do no wrong.

There are definitely aspects of this series that I do feel are worthy of heavier critique. Oftentimes the ages of the characters feel uncomfortably off; Daenerys being no more than thirteen when she is sold to and impregnated by a thirty-something year old Drogo is uncomfortable at best and disturbing at worst. Likewise, the questionable objectification and sexualisation of young girls in the series is… weird. It’s weird. Unreliable narration and the in-world societal context aside, it doesn’t sit comfortably with me.While the narrative and author do critique this sexualisation in parts, this critique not always executed well and doesn’t necessarily justify its prevalence throughout the series.

While Martin’s portrayal of women and their suffering is not without flaw and can be, at times, gratuitous in nature for the most part he manages to depict female characters that are as nuanced as their male counterparts. Again, this is not without flaw. However, I disagree with the notion that Martin’s female characters are one-note or uninteresting. Rather, Martin has managed to craft female characters which encompass a breadth of strengths, weakness and motivations; creating a cast of multi-faced and flawed women. From Cersei and Catelyn; to Sansa and Arya; to Daenerys and Missendei — no two female characters are the same.

Although not perfect, ‘A Game of Thrones’ is considered one of modern fantasy’s best for a reason. George R. R. Martin is an expert at his craft and the world he has built is one that I have found myself revisiting year after year. With characters that have cemented themselves as among my all time favourites and a world whose mysteries are yet to unravel, it’s no wonder it has been a cornerstone of the genre for so long.

It was fantastic to revisit this book, it definitely won’t be the last time.

[Note: I read and rated this book sometime in 2018 - 2019 and gave it two stars. I do not stand by that rating. In fact, I’m pretty sure I was just being an edgy loser.]

Content Warnings

lucakocsis's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

trafalgar_law's review

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

Content Warnings

lqne's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix

5.0

Content Warnings

fifteenthjessica's review

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

So, this is my second time reading it. After feeling like Wizard of Earthsea was a drudge and a few dnfs, I thought I should reread something I liked, and picked Game of Thrones (first read in summer of 2013) because, for the better part of the year, my urge to write fan fic of it has returned. I spent about a month and a half on this.

I'm still invested in a lot of the characters, both ones who played a major role in this book and ones who don't play a major role or even appear until later, but reading it when you know a lot of the shocking moves,

like Bran's fall, the incest, the death of Eddard Stark,

wasn't as fun for me. George R. R. Martin's prose alternates between gorgeous descriptions and awkward or uncomfortable in ways that I don't think served Martin's goals.

Part of the reason I rooted for Viserys Targaryen's death was because I thought after he died, I'd hear less about 13-14 year old Daenerys Targaryen's breasts and nipples.

Dialogue can be iffy as well. Like, characters who probably haven't talked much all refer to the political games in King's Landing as "the game of thrones" which comes off as a heavy handed title drop. Between how long it took me to read this and Dreamsongs, volume 1 this year, the rest of his writing doesn't do as much for me as his characters.

I have heard a lot of people praise his world building, and as an aspiring writer/actual dungeon master who has dabbled in world building her own fantasy settings, Martin's quality is very inconsistent at best. Daenerys spends a lot of time with the Dothraki over the course of five hefty books, but the culture comes off as very one dimensional and most members of it are forgettable. I don't think I'm alone in remembering all Dothraki characters except Khal Drogo exclusively in terms of their relationship to Dany and maybe a name because they are very unimportant. Heck, there's a short paragraph in one of Dany's later chapters that feels like Martin is just dumping the personality of the youngest of her future bloodriders (Aggo? The three of them really blur together) on us in place of letting it unfold naturally as he interacts with Dany. The culture is mostly a combination of raiding and horses, almost to the point of impracticality (how many horses do they keep if they need them for transportation, fighting, clothing, and meat, plus burn horses in the funeral pyres of their leaders so they have a mount in the afterlife? There's a reason real world horseback nomadic cultures usually herd other animals). This is especially bad if you compare them to the equally raiding focused Ironborn, who in later novels are fleshed out through four point of view characters and with a number of memorable side characters that show that not everyone is raiding every waking hour of the day.

Content Warnings

ultimatecryptid's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Read this book for the first time in middle school, and rereading it now is an interesting experience.

For me, the most important part of GoT is divorcing it from the genre of political fantasy. Some of our protagonists may be nobility in a feudal society, and as such participate in politics, they are not the ends of the book, or even the means. GoT is intensely character-driven, and is about the wide variety of ways people may view the same actions. Most of the time I think Martin excels here, and is only circumstantially hindered. However, he undercuts his own character building sometimes, especially with the racism built into the Braavosi storyline, which is intense and unescapeable in Daenerys' chapters.

Also worth noting: GoT is one of the few fantasy novels I have read which explore the idea that manhood is also a destructive institution in the same way womanhood is.

Content Warnings

dracula's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

An absolutely brilliant first book. This was a re-read for me but was still like reading for the first time. I still found myself surprised by events I knew were coming and found myself warming to characters that I hadn’t in the first season of the show. Unsurprisingly Arya remains my favourite POV character, but Daenerys was a close second. There were several interesting distinctions from the show in characterisation that I feel would’ve made me more sympathetic to particularly Sansa from the very beginning.

While this probably won’t be my favourite in the series, I most definitely enjoyed it and look forward to continuing ASOIAF.

Content Warnings

More...