Reviews

Death from a Top Hat by Clayton Rawson

sophiemanhol's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

quietjenn's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It's a rather Byzantine mystery, as perhaps fits a series centered on a magician/illusionist. Pretty enjoyable though.

dillydallying's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

gawronma's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It was good and fun reading a mystery from the American golden age of mysteries.

iwanttoreadallthebooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I didn't enjoy this at all. I appreciate that Otto Penzler is trying to bring interest back to some of the classics of American mysteries, but for me, this was a clunker. I was excited by the premise, involving murder in a locked room and a magician solving the mystery. However, Death from a Top Hat was just boring and wordy. I try to avoid skimming through books but I was having so much trouble getting through this that I had to resort to skimming. I have enjoyed some of the other mysteries in Penzler's American Mystery Classics series but I think the word "classic" is quite a stretch for Death from a Top Hat.
To be honest, I think I was fairly generous with a 2 star rating.

ssejig's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I grabbed this book because it was first in a series and I had read two other books and figured, "Why not?" Well. It took me a LONG time to read this book. I can usually finish a book this long in a week and it took me over 5 months. It just didn't hold my interest. I like the series because Merlini is a detective who comes with the background of being a magician. This book had too MANY peformers (also a medium, an escape artist, and a ventriloquist) and it ended up being very confusing with some misconceptions about hypnotism. If you want to read a locked room mystery involving a two different dead magicians, I'd highly recommend reading it in as few sittings as possible.

captainjaq's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

As someone involved in both the world of magic and the world of literature, I’m surprised it took me this long to come around to Clayton Rawson’s “Merlini” books. These are widely considered classics of the “locked room” mystery genre and it’s with very good cause.

The book follows Ross Harte, a reporter and sometimes mystery writer who gets dragged into a locked room case happening in his apartment building. Harte is known to Police Inspector Gavigan and when things look a bit confusing fairly early on, and all of the suspects are magicians and entertainers, Harte and Gavigan both have the same idea, call in a consultant who might know a thing or two about magic and mystery: The Great Merlini. Merlini is a stage magician and magic shop owner (like Houdini, Merlini has presumably added the “i” in homage to a great wizard) who also happens to dabble as an amateur detective when the case fits his particular set of skills. This case does.

A believer in the black arts is found dead inside a conjuring pentagram which has been drawn on the floor of his apartment. Of course, to find this body the assembled group who would soon all become suspects must break in and it is quickly discovered there was no way in or out leaving everyone perplexed.

A second locked room shows up about two thirds through book, giving Merlini a new riddle to solve. A second room with the body laid out the same way and here we get a great bit of actual magical knowledge, that a magician may be able to perform the same trick in a number of different ways to throw off the audience, because when they perform the same trick for a magician, each time the viewer gets closer to piecing together the secret.

This is a nice bit of verité, here, since Rawson himself was a performing magician and so was able to provide all sorts of little tid bits and asides, things which make you think you’re getting an insider view of the tricks, a backstage peek, but you’re not. In reality, even in 1938 when this book was written, the methods given up were old or unusual methods, when he even ascribed a method at all. Often Rawson hinted at a secret but in the end revealed nothing.

While Rawson has a great way of developing the mystery and revealing the clues (a nice touch in this edition is they actually point out where in the text the clues are to be found as Merlini reveals them during his final summation), he is not great, at least not in this first book, at creating individual characters who have anything beyond a slight third dimension. It was easy to get characters confused and not quite remember who was who and where. In the end, it required a fair bit of concentrated effort to make sure we knew who everyone was and why they wanted other people dead.

That all said, I’m looking forward to reading the next in the series.

iwanttoreadallthebooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I didn't enjoy this at all. I appreciate that Otto Penzler is trying to bring interest back to some of the classics of American mysteries, but for me, this was a clunker. I was excited by the premise, involving murder in a locked room and a magician solving the mystery. However, Death from a Top Hat was just boring and wordy. I try to avoid skimming through books but I was having so much trouble getting through this that I had to resort to skimming. I have enjoyed some of the other mysteries in Penzler's American Mystery Classics series but I think the word "classic" is quite a stretch for Death from a Top Hat.
To be honest, I think I was fairly generous with a 2 star rating.

tannat's review

Go to review page

2.0

1.5 stars
More...