Scan barcode
siobst's review against another edition
4.0
This was such an interesting book to me, both as a mother who breastfed and as an L&D nurse who routinely educates patients on breastfeeding. I found it to be quite informative as to the negative effects of our environmental toxins (mostly man-made) on our breasts and bodies (men and women alike). At times I felt quite frustrated and helpless in light of the information she provides. She spends a fair amount of time discussing the toxins found in breast milk and to some degree leaves the reader feeling like breastfeeding isn't necessarily superior to formula for that reason.. My criticism is that she does not provide a comparison of formula (or cow's or soy milk for that matter) in terms of amounts of toxins found. I would guess they'd be similar, at least for cow's or soy milk, assuming that those toxins can be filtered out of formula in the production process. One comment I did enjoy in the book was that it seems ludicrous that breasts are the only organ that do not have their own medical specialty. So true! Great reading, not just about breasts but also about the state of environmental affairs and what it's doing to our children and our cancer rates. At times this book reminded me of the "environmental trigger" theme that was discussed in "Emperor of Maladies". If you enjoyed that one, I'd whole-heartedly recommend this one.
deservingporcupine's review against another edition
5.0
This book did everything a nonfiction book should: enlighten, terrify, mobilize. I totally want to join a grassroots campaign to start testing and regulating new chemicals before we make baby toys out of them. BECAUSE WE DON'T DO THAT ALREADY. I actually had a difficult time getting through a lot of this book because it was so horrifying.
mkhunterz's review against another edition
1.5
More a book about toxins than about breasts. Also incredibly cis-sexist.
spacewhombus's review against another edition
funny
informative
reflective
fast-paced
4.0
Though in 2023 I am sure this is already outdated science, I found this super interesting. From the evolution and cultural history of breasts (surprise! they are for breastfeeding, not men's sexual fantasies), to the make and benefits of breastmilk and its increasing toxin content, to the history of breast implants, to the role of hormones in breast development all the way from puberty to old age- this book covered nearly everything I never knew I wanted to know about breasts. The most surprising thing was probably how little is known about them in the first place, at least in the scientific community of 2012.
leslielikesthings's review against another edition
3.0
I think going with the audio version of this one was a mistake. It was too easy for my mind to wander through the more science-y bits, and there were a lot of science-y bits. It didn't help that I was listening to this in a period of personal distraction. Not the book's fault, but I really didn't put much of my brain into it, and it needed a lot more of my attention for me to get much out of it.
What I did manage to absorb had me pretty much convinced that I'm going to die early because my body is thoroughly polluted with nasty chemicals, so that's fun.
What I did manage to absorb had me pretty much convinced that I'm going to die early because my body is thoroughly polluted with nasty chemicals, so that's fun.
simlish's review against another edition
4.0
Reminded me strongly of Mary Roach (and that's a good thing). The sort of deep dive journalism I really enjoy, with a conversational tone and strong narrative voice balancing out the nitty gritty scientific details. I would be interested in an update with the effects of HRT on trans people, going both directions, but otherwise no complaints
emgusk's review against another edition
3.0
I should know better than to read a 10 year old pop science book in a field that’s constantly evolving, but it was on the shelf and it’s a subject I’m interested in. Too much about chemicals, BPAs (most of that appears to be unfounded at this time) and others and not enough about breast cancer. Yes, as the author repeated several times, only 10% of breast cancers are genetic, but why not talk about genetic cancers more? The author did a good job at weighing the pros/cons of breast feeding; even though she says she’s “granola” several times, she doesn’t claim that breast feeding is definitely superior. A few very early trial studies made it into this book that a layperson might put trust into, but findings aren’t there yet. Why the emphasis at keeping breasts? If they’re WAY more likely to kill you even if you want to feed a kid with them some day, preventative mastectomy might be your best option, you can get rid of them and move on. Weird to not include that in the book but several early trials that don’t seem to have amounted to much. This book is about breasts as they exist to feed babies. I should stick to breast cancer books!
Despite this book’s flaws, it was a well-written and quick read. I read it in a day. Journalists are good at writing books!
Despite this book’s flaws, it was a well-written and quick read. I read it in a day. Journalists are good at writing books!