zsuzssanna's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No

3.25

Oszinten meglepett hogy hova fut ki a cselekmeny de nem jo értelemben. Sokkal jobban indult annál mint ami lett belőle 

sayshara's review against another edition

Go to review page

Started good, but was dragging in the middle. Then I went out of town and didn't read it for several days. Now I can't get back into it.

laurenbrace's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.5

alexcirce's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.5

liambetts's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Strange. Cool to see how Life of Pi was influenced by this (Richard Parker, Tiger).

ja_mehess's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

hana_camile's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced

2.0

seleniangent's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

richardleis's review

Go to review page

3.0

I'm not really sure what to make of Edgar Allan Poe's only novel. It has brilliant and adventurous moments, but it also has racist, tedious, boring, deranged, and graphic and gory passages, resulting in an unholy creation with a baffling and abrupt ending (or is it an allegorical ending?) What works is how Poe can't help but to infuse the novel with a sense of the uncanny. What doesn't work are obvious narrative mistakes (uh, Poe, you can't kill that character off after earlier in the story saying he was alive years later) and sudden passages of exposition that read like an early 19th Century Wikipedia.

Nevertheless, The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym, as baffling as it is, remains a fascinating work.

richardleis's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Useful context and footnotes for a very strange and not entirely successful novel.