adventurous challenging emotional

Good
adventurous mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
adventurous dark mysterious fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Като последен роман за Шерлок Холмс останах разочарована. Действието се развиваше бавно и този път не успях да почувствам връзка между героите и мен. А може би просто вече да съм се наситили на случаите с детекнива, тъй като през последната седмица и половина чета само за него.

Very interesting story. I really was really surprised at the ending, wasn't expecting Birdy to be who he was. But it was very well written and very thrilling.
adventurous mysterious tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: No

A single mystery plus it's back story that was surreal and not quite in the way it was intended. Freemasons = unions = mafia/racketeers in Pennsylvania in the 1850s. WTF? The Sherlock Holmes bit is decent. The "back story" is kind if appalling.

Stephen Fry nails it again. This, like the first novel, is split into two halves. This first is about how Holmes solves the case. The second half is describing WHY Holmes was needed.
The first half was very enjoyable, the second not so much. I can see why it would have been a good read back in the day, but it has lost something over the years.
Still a good read and am glad i have read it.