Reviews with content warning for Violence - The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde / Der seltsame Fall von Dr. Jekyll und Mr. Hyde

Reviews tagging 'Violence'

The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde / Der seltsame Fall von Dr. Jekyll und Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson

67 reviews

norahculbertson's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

Content Warnings

sorcha_rosa's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

This novella is really funny and no one talks about that element, but I really enjoyed that. The story was also compelling and interesting. However, it is a Victorian novella and therefore there is a lot of ableism, and alignment of 'undesirable' facial features/body descriptions, that were use to show 'evilness,' so that tampered my enjoyment of it.

Content Warnings

akissforcatullus's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative mysterious reflective tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

!Review Contains Spoilers!

An obscure and mystifying read. This book had me thinking of things I had yet to thoroughly contemplate and ask questions about—like, good and evil, and how both reside in us, and if there is a natural predilection to one over the other? Or is it that we simply choose one because that’s how we’re conditioned to think? Is good and kindness inherently selfish since many are doing it in hopes of getting to a better place?? I don’t know. It also invoked in me a sense of sympathy. We all have vices and sinful cravings. Dr Jekyll became incredibly enthralled by them, as well as conflicted by the polarisation of his mind and thoughts. He lost sight of things for a while, then tried to rid himself of his overwhelming compulsions to transform into Mr. Hyde, but he relapsed after 2 months of being clean of his evil self. The way it all happened was a reflection on—what felt to me like—addiction, in a general sense.

I liked the atmosphere in this book, i.e. the constant fog and overall dreariness. I wasn’t horrified by Dr Jekyll—his actions? Yes. Him in appearance? No. This was probably because everything about him and the wickedness he exudes is incredibly vague, and my imagination couldn’t conjure something terrifying from his descriptions, which I hardly remember much about besides the fact that he’s short and has indistinct, unfathomable and foggy “deformities”. All I had pictured in my head was a short and angry man. Every character felt so suppressed in their emotions/inner strifes, as they hardly ever verbalised personal matters—this is more patent at the end when both of Mr. Utterson’s (MC) friends reveal the truth through written letters rather than telling him. But even though they didn’t, I’m not disappointed. I thoroughly enjoyed the ending. Everything was leading to Dr Jekylls admission, and having it written the way it was in the end just felt fitting, and I wouldn’t have wanted it any other way; it was vague and it was indirect, which is the embodiment of this book.

I feel I would’ve given this book a higher rating had I not spoiled it for myself prior to reading it—the ending would’ve definitely been much more of a shock—but because I did spoil it, I found myself not grappling for the next page, but rather just restlessly waiting till Mr. Utterson finally knew the truth. Though, the ending was much more insightful and not as concise as just “hey, I was Mr Hyde all along”. No. It explained much more—which I’m grateful for.

Something I found interesting to know was how 2 years after this book’s publication, Jack the Ripper was terrorising the streets of London (which is where this book was set in), and because of this, stage plays of this book had to be discontinued out of consideration for the disastrous climate of the time: ‘ The London public drew parallels between Jack the Ripper's reported medical skill and Dr. Jekyll's medical background as described in "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." ’.

Overall, I liked the writing style and recurring obscurity. I liked that it was concise and didn’t drag on. I’m just annoyed at myself for spoiling the book before I had read it, thus dampening an experience that could’ve been much more entertaining and bewildering.
•••

My edition included ‘The Body Snatcher’, which I gave a 3.5 stars. The ending was quite fantastic, and I thoroughly enjoyed how quick and shocking the whole story was. I got to learn, from the footnotes, about Robert Knox and the Burke and Hare murders—which was an appalling case.
•••

My edition also includes ‘Olalla’. I gave this a 3.5 stars, too. I had a soft spot for the romantic yearning in this story, as well as the Gothic setting and themes. Though not explicitly mentioned what the mother is, it’s still quite clear either way, and it is the evil she happens to be that causes a rift between the main character and Olalla, her spoilt genetic line, too, bringing them further apart. It was littered with religion, peculiar characters, an isolated setting, volatile weather, mutual pining, and a fiend(?). It was short and easy to enjoy.

Content Warnings

solouncapitulomas's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

4.2

“If I am the chief of sinners, I am the chief of sufferers also.”

this is a good book to read on halloween bc, even tho not that terrifying and pretty fast paced it is an interesting mystery and if you do not know the main spoiler (which is hard considering it is a classic) you'll enjoy it even more

i was listening to ain't no rest for the wicked by cage the elephant & burning pile by mother mother while writing this review

'kay, i'm out
bye

Content Warnings

jja_b's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Great read! I’m a sucker for 1800s gothic London.

Content Warnings

chaexi's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious reflective tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75

Content Warnings

ploominator's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

sandy_21's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious reflective tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

Content Warnings

lexarobinson's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark tense slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

Confusing. I understand that it's a classic, but I never really felt a connection to this book. My rating is boosted by the interesting premise, but that is really as far as praise for Stevenson's work can go (aside from the judicious metaphors which got me full marks in my GCSE, thanks king). His writing style is pretty laboured, and he focuses too much on the scientific elements of Jekyll's transformation rather than the atrocities of Hyde. However, between the two characters, he does present moral ambiguity to an extent I am yet to see rivalled by anyone, so Stevenson deserves to be commended for that.

Content Warnings

holthmsn's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a perfect short science-fiction based story. The novel was a perfectly fine read which I enjoyed, but nothing jumps out to make it an amazing read.

Content Warnings

More...