Scan barcode
sarah_zaffiro's review against another edition
dark
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
I did appreciate that the narrator (the flea) referred to the male characters as what they are: absolutely terrible people. This differs from, say, The Romance of Lust, for example, which revels in its debauchery. This narrator shows pity for its main character & recognizes her as a victim who fell prey to gross old men instead of applauding said men’s depravity.
Graphic: Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Adult/minor relationship, Incest, Pedophilia, Rape, and Child abuse
Minor: Death of parent and Death
davebald80's review against another edition
Victorian erotica. I was amused at first, but eventually found the whole thing a bit tedious.
pastelhellion's review
challenging
dark
funny
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.25
It's a porn novella from the point if view of a flea. So it's exactly what you would expect - very horny and comical. My two drawbacks are that my copy has some typos, and that the two female characters are only 14, and engaging in all that.
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Incest, Sexual violence, and Sexual assault
useless_aesthete's review against another edition
1.0
I thought it an interesting task to look at the language and euphemisms of 19th century erotica, and now I'll have to deal with the consquences. Ew.
daisywilkes's review against another edition
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
More...