Scan barcode
caseey's review against another edition
3.0
If I was rating this book on atmosphere alone, it would undoubtedly deserve all of the stars in the world but sadly the plot didn't rivet me as much as I expected it to after enjoying Tremayne's previous book as much as I did. It picked up in the last quarter or so and finally drew me in as the situation grew increasingly terrifying but the twist towards the end was so far fetched that it caused me to become disenchanted all over again. Tremaine does a ten out of ten job of portraying his characters' distress but overall the build up just wasn't enough for me; I also felt David was particularly underdeveloped. Maybe I just wasn't in the right mood for this book or maybe my expectations were too high because overall it fell flat for me hence barely having the motivation to write anything but such a lacklustre review as this one.
salomeja's review against another edition
1.0
Istorija iš tų, kur moteris atvažiuoja į didžiulį paslaptingą namą, jame kažkas dedasi, lenda buvusios paslaptys, lyg ir vaidenasi, lyg ir vyksta kažkas antgamtiško. Nors nebūtinai dalykai yra tokie, kokie atrodo iš pirmo žvilgsnio. Taip, tikrai, kartais pasitaiko įdomių knygų su tokiu siužetu. Bet ne šį kartą. Veikėjai buvo nuobodūs, intrigos niekas nekėlė, atomazga nieko įdomaus neatskleidė. Visiškas, visiškas nesusipratimas.
booksandlists's review against another edition
I am deeply bored by the random renovation/environment descriptions and slow moving plot. DNF 23%
sreesha_diva's review against another edition
2.0
2.5*
This review originally appeared on Rain and a Book
You know this story. You’ve read this cliche before. A not-so-well-off photography professor Rachel Daly* meets an extremely wealthy man several years her senior. David Kerthen** is widowed; his wife Nina died in one of the mines on his thousand-year-old family property. He now lives with his eight year old son Jamie***. Rachel falls in love with David (of course) and even more so with his pale-faced, raven-haired son. Following a whirlwind romance, the two marry and Rachel leaves her poverty-stricken London life behind (to the envy of her friends) and moves to the Carnhallow House with David.
The Kerthens are an old family, who owe their wealth to their luck with the mines in the area. They were cruel, and did not care about those who lost their lives in the mines.
Caught in the memories of an old world is David’s mother Juliet. Through her, Rachel learns of the legend of the fire children. Soon after, Rachel’s stepson Jamie begins to act strange. He’s convinced that he’s a fire child and that his mother is coming back. Rachel herself begins to feel Nina is in the house – she can sense her presence, see her, smell her perfume, hear her voice, and what not.
*Has sad eyes
**Is a “‘broken’, womanizing lawyer”, who’s interestingly very much devoted to his first wife (no sign of any womanizing) and is very inarticulate for a lawyer.
***Kid can’t spell “write” but can spell “dinosaur”
The beginning of the story felt a lot like Rebecca to me. In fact, there’s this line in one of the chapters “Last night he’d [David] dreamt of Carnhallow again.” which, I know I’m probably looking for connections here, but it sounded a lot like the opening sentence of Rebecca to me. But that feeling quickly passes.
At the outset, let me mention, this is not a bad story. On the whole. But it’s been executed poorly (“poorly” being the kindest word I can think of right now). For one, it drags on and on and on and then leads to a laughably rushed ending. Why does it drag on? Because every third paragraph is a description of the sun and the sea and the mines (or, in the latter part, the snow and the sea and the mines) At one point, a character goes on to describe in detail the view from a supermarket. Just… why? We get it, it’s lovely, move on. Repetitions aside, there are these annoying inconsistencies throughout the book. I may sound nitpicky, but on one page Rachel tells us she does not tan, but she describes her “tanning shoulders” a few pages later. Minor detail, yes, but such things rub me the wrong way.
Everyone in this book is an overthinker and an overreactor. Either I’m missing chunks of the story, or these people are plain crazy. They go from state A to conclusion Z without analyzing (or at least merely considering) B to Y in between. To read the rest of this review, please click here: Rain and a Book
Note: I received an ARC from Netgalley. This review is honest and unbiased.
This review originally appeared on Rain and a Book
You know this story. You’ve read this cliche before. A not-so-well-off photography professor Rachel Daly* meets an extremely wealthy man several years her senior. David Kerthen** is widowed; his wife Nina died in one of the mines on his thousand-year-old family property. He now lives with his eight year old son Jamie***. Rachel falls in love with David (of course) and even more so with his pale-faced, raven-haired son. Following a whirlwind romance, the two marry and Rachel leaves her poverty-stricken London life behind (to the envy of her friends) and moves to the Carnhallow House with David.
The Kerthens are an old family, who owe their wealth to their luck with the mines in the area. They were cruel, and did not care about those who lost their lives in the mines.
Caught in the memories of an old world is David’s mother Juliet. Through her, Rachel learns of the legend of the fire children. Soon after, Rachel’s stepson Jamie begins to act strange. He’s convinced that he’s a fire child and that his mother is coming back. Rachel herself begins to feel Nina is in the house – she can sense her presence, see her, smell her perfume, hear her voice, and what not.
*Has sad eyes
**Is a “‘broken’, womanizing lawyer”, who’s interestingly very much devoted to his first wife (no sign of any womanizing) and is very inarticulate for a lawyer.
***Kid can’t spell “write” but can spell “dinosaur”
The beginning of the story felt a lot like Rebecca to me. In fact, there’s this line in one of the chapters “Last night he’d [David] dreamt of Carnhallow again.” which, I know I’m probably looking for connections here, but it sounded a lot like the opening sentence of Rebecca to me. But that feeling quickly passes.
At the outset, let me mention, this is not a bad story. On the whole. But it’s been executed poorly (“poorly” being the kindest word I can think of right now). For one, it drags on and on and on and then leads to a laughably rushed ending. Why does it drag on? Because every third paragraph is a description of the sun and the sea and the mines (or, in the latter part, the snow and the sea and the mines) At one point, a character goes on to describe in detail the view from a supermarket. Just… why? We get it, it’s lovely, move on. Repetitions aside, there are these annoying inconsistencies throughout the book. I may sound nitpicky, but on one page Rachel tells us she does not tan, but she describes her “tanning shoulders” a few pages later. Minor detail, yes, but such things rub me the wrong way.
Everyone in this book is an overthinker and an overreactor. Either I’m missing chunks of the story, or these people are plain crazy. They go from state A to conclusion Z without analyzing (or at least merely considering) B to Y in between. To read the rest of this review, please click here: Rain and a Book
Note: I received an ARC from Netgalley. This review is honest and unbiased.
gingersnaphattie's review against another edition
4.0
Slow to get started and not as gripping as The Ice Twins, but for the last 200 pages I was hooked.
The twist at the end was original and quite unexpected! I love having multiple unreliable narrators!
I look forward to reading more of this author's work.
The twist at the end was original and quite unexpected! I love having multiple unreliable narrators!
I look forward to reading more of this author's work.
francebeck's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
mycriminalmind's review against another edition
4.0
Her er min omtale av Ildbarnet. Linken fører til min bokblogg. https://mineboker.wordpress.com/2017/05/05/ildbarnet-av-s-k-tremayne/
lushbug's review against another edition
2.0
This started of well and actually reminded me of the Rebecca a bit, but I felt it lost its way half way through turning into a lame thriller.
All in all a decent enough thriller for those that like the genre.
All in all a decent enough thriller for those that like the genre.