Scan barcode
melethwi's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
The only note I can give this book is that you have to suspend disbelief to accept how much science the MC knows- but that's pretty much par for the course of an Andy Weir book, and didn't bother me too much.
Graphic: Medical content, Confinement, Injury/Injury detail, Alcohol, Death, and Excrement
Moderate: Vomit and Suicidal thoughts
Minor: Blood, Drug use, War, and Grief
pata's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
La sinopsis oficial hace mucho spoiler, porque nada más empezar el libro estás en blanco -con el protagonista- y vas descubriendo -recordando- cosas, pero si has leído la sinopsis te sobra casi el primer tercio del libro, la verdad.
Me sobran también ciertos detalles de los flashbacks. Hay personajes que parecen payasos, no sé si el autor quería hacerlos peculiares o únicos, pero a mí me sobran completamente esos "quirks" (y no son nada creíbles).
Lo mejor es sin duda Rocky, alias "la araña culona" (nunca un error de traducción caló tanto en la sociedad). Soy muy, muy, muy fan de Rocky. Se gana el libro.
Poco más que añadir. El final me ha encantado, una maravilla, gracias. Me han faltado algunas cosas ahí (explicaciones, tal y cual) pero es de lo mejorcito que he leído.
La verdad es que estuve a punto de dejarlo al principio, porque se parecía demasiado a otro Marciano y no quería leer otras 500 páginas de eso. Pero me alegro de haber seguido.
Resumen: genialidad con exceso de ciencia. No leas la sinopsis si puedes evitarlo.
Graphic: Drug use, Confinement, Death, Suicide, Excrement, Injury/Injury detail, and Suicidal thoughts
atamano's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Death
Moderate: Injury/Injury detail, Confinement, and Alcohol
Minor: Sexual content
crunchylettuce's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
1.75
Graphic: Drug use
Moderate: Injury/Injury detail, Alcohol, Cancer, Excrement, Medical content, and Suicide
Explicit discussion of planned assisted suicide - one of the methods that are discussed would be drug overdose.vif's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
Graphic: Injury/Injury detail and Fire/Fire injury
Moderate: Death, Suicide, Drug use, and Kidnapping
Minor: Cannibalism, Vomit, and Alcohol
amiegold's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Moderate: Injury/Injury detail and Medical content
Minor: Alcohol and Cursing
lindsbian's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Death, Injury/Injury detail, Confinement, Grief, Suicide, and Medical content
Moderate: Alcohol and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Animal cruelty, Body horror, Drug use, and Kidnapping
bigteo's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
I’m not too great at writing positive reviews. It’s much easier (and more fun) to pick apart things and criticise them. So what I’ll do instead is address my thoughts on some criticisms I’ve seen in some reviews.
Firstly, I’ve seen people say that they could not understand the science talk in this book, even to the point of DNF-ing. I understand that some people struggle with this and I’m not here to argue with that or call anyone stupid or something. I will simply say that in my opinion, you don’t really HAVE to understand the science side of it. I don’t really get the specifics of how a centrifuge works, but the book explains that it affects gravity, and why that’s important to the characters, and therefore that’s the all information you really need. I feel like the author does a great job at “dumbing” down concepts like these but also explaining how it works and why it’s relevant. For example, I don’t fully understand time dilation. I’m not a scientist, I don’t have a phd in anything. But I understand that going near the speed of light means that relative time to you is, like, longer to someone on earth. That’s all I need. And it makes sense for the character to explain that to you. He’s a scientist himself, why wouldn’t he? He also has amnesia, and he’s trying to piece together what’s going on at the same pace as the reader. It doesn’t take me out of the story at all, in fact, it makes me feel really interested. I personally really enjoy learning alongside reading. Maybe it’s a personal preference but it makes me really appreciate how much time and research the author has obviously put into the story.
Another criticism I’ve seen floating around is that the female antagonist character is sexist. Well, yeah, she’s an antagonist, and she’s called out on it? It doesn’t really matter. This book doesn’t really have a diverse cast of characters because, by nature of the plot, it can’t. So I’m not too bothered about that. The characters that do exist (especially a certain character that appears in the second half of the book) have excellent dialogue.
So there are some slight criticisms I have. Maybe the main character IS a bit bland, and that’s probably because book is in first person, which isn’t my cup of tea. And for the first half of the novel, the main character has no-one to say anything to. Those things are literally the only thing I can say that are even remotely negative.
Aside from that, the book literally made me cry at the end and books don’t often do that to me. I am IN LOVE with a certain character that appears in the second half. The book just gets better and better as you read on.
Graphic: Medical content
Minor: Injury/Injury detail
tarynlannister's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Death, Confinement, Grief, and Excrement
Minor: Suicidal thoughts, Kidnapping, Injury/Injury detail, Medical content, and Suicide
longtallemm's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Death, Fire/Fire injury, and Grief
Minor: Drug use, Suicide, Drug abuse, Injury/Injury detail, and Alcohol