Reviews

Wage-Labor and Capital by Taylor Anderson, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels

birdybutt24's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

A good time! Nice book to read on vacation or by the fireside... You get absorbed in it's twists and turns as you learn about wage-labor and capital. Great read.... Very Cool!

anitak88's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Short but interesting listen

heylook's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Very important if at times very dry Marx, mostly focusing on economic theory, but occasionally discussing political/philosophical/ethical problems. Almost definitely more groundbreaking and important when it was published than it is now - much of the important stuff can be found in some of his other works.

geonox's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative slow-paced

5.0

namesache's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative fast-paced

4.0

andredias's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging informative medium-paced

2.0

"Wage Labour and Capital" by Karl Marx is an intellectually unsatisfying read that fails to provide a convincing argument against capitalism. The central theme revolves around Marx's critique of the capitalist system, particularly the relationship between workers (proletariat) and capitalists (bourgeoisie). Despite its historical significance, the book is riddled with theoretical flaws and lacks practical solutions.

Marx's primary argument in the book centers on the exploitation of labor by capitalists, asserting that workers are systematically oppressed and alienated. While he does raise some valid concerns about income inequality and the power dynamics within capitalism, his proposed solutions are impractical and fail to account for the complexities of the real world.

One of the major shortcomings of "Wage Labour and Capital" is its oversimplification of economic relationships. Marx tends to view capitalists as a homogenous group with unified interests, ignoring the diversity within the bourgeoisie class. In reality, capitalists have varying motivations, business practices, and levels of influence. This oversimplification weakens Marx's argument, as it fails to accurately represent the nuanced nature of capitalist societies.

Furthermore, Marx's analysis neglects the role of innovation and entrepreneurship in driving economic progress. He portrays capitalists as mere exploiters, ignoring their crucial role in creating jobs, fostering innovation, and contributing to overall economic development. Capitalism, with all its imperfections, has undeniably been a driving force behind technological advancements and improvements in living standards.

The book also suffers from a lack of empirical evidence to support its claims. Marx relies heavily on abstract theories and historical examples, but his arguments lack concrete data and fail to consider the multitude of factors that contribute to economic outcomes. This lack of empirical grounding weakens the credibility of Marx's analysis and makes it difficult to take his prescriptions for societal change seriously.

Marx's emphasis on class struggle as the driving force of historical development oversimplifies the complex interplay of various social, political, and economic factors. Human societies are influenced by a multitude of forces, and reducing their evolution to a simplistic class struggle oversimplifies the intricate dynamics at play.

Additionally, Marx's vision of a classless, stateless society lacks a realistic pathway for implementation. His call for a revolutionary overthrow of the capitalist system is not only impractical but also ignores the potential consequences of such radical upheaval. History has shown that attempts to forcibly implement Marxist ideals have often led to authoritarian regimes and economic stagnation.

In conclusion, "Wage Labour and Capital" falls short of providing a compelling critique of capitalism. While Marx raises valid concerns about income inequality and the power dynamics inherent in the capitalist system, his analysis is marred by oversimplification, lack of empirical evidence, and impractical solutions. A more nuanced and evidence-based approach is necessary to truly understand and address the challenges posed by contemporary economic systems.

megit2's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

most teenagers start with adam smith, then they decide to see if marx has any kick. it does.

vampiricfunghi's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative medium-paced

4.0

byrenical's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

His predictions of capitalism sound like they would have been terrible, good job they never came to fruition...

woolfsfahan's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Essential Marxist reading. Marx distills many of the arguments from Capital into a style much less likely to induce a brain bleed, making this a great introductory text to more advanced Marxist theory.