Scan barcode
jennyedwall's review
challenging
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
signealtersten's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
mysterious
reflective
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
chamolilies's review
5.0
Loved this book! Especially the parts centred on the Master and Margarita together, and the Master speaking about Margarita.
I would like to reread it in the future though, as I believe I would get more out of it once already familiar with the story.
I would like to reread it in the future though, as I believe I would get more out of it once already familiar with the story.
marihelene's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
funny
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.25
rowanoats's review
2.0
When I was a teen, I tried to read La Divina Commedia for a school project. I never got further than skimming through Hell and in retrospect, I really didn't possess enough knowledge about 13th century Italian politics to appreciate it.
This book felt a lot like that. I'm sure it says a whole lot about 1930s Russia but for me, right now, in 2019 without a degree in Russian history and/or literature, it just reads like a weird, random, confusing slog. So many characters and names and nicknames I stood no chance of keeping track of. I don't really know what happened, I don't know what it was a metaphor for, and although the preface of the edition I read claims it's a masterpiece, a manifesto -resistance - I feel like I need to take a class on literature science to truly pick up on any of that.
The second half was better, as it seemed to have more of a plot and I didn't mind the Jerusalem parts as much as others seem to have. I'm glad people enjoy it, but I sure didn't.
This book felt a lot like that. I'm sure it says a whole lot about 1930s Russia but for me, right now, in 2019 without a degree in Russian history and/or literature, it just reads like a weird, random, confusing slog. So many characters and names and nicknames I stood no chance of keeping track of. I don't really know what happened, I don't know what it was a metaphor for, and although the preface of the edition I read claims it's a masterpiece, a manifesto -resistance - I feel like I need to take a class on literature science to truly pick up on any of that.
The second half was better, as it seemed to have more of a plot and I didn't mind the Jerusalem parts as much as others seem to have. I'm glad people enjoy it, but I sure didn't.
barbarab's review
challenging
funny
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
nicogd's review against another edition
funny
mysterious
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.5
More...