fast-paced
mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
challenging dark mysterious reflective relaxing slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
mysterious fast-paced
adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

Despite Murder on the Orient Express being over seventy-five years old, this locked room mystery was intriguing and timeless, and the solution was as logical as it was surprising. For mystery readers that like to guess whodunit,
Spoilerthis is one rare case where almost any guess is partially correct, as almost every character in the book had a hand in the murder, literally
.

This was my first exposure to Hercule Poirot and my second to Agatha Christie, my first being The Murder in the Vicarage, a Miss Marple mystery. On that small sample size, I think I prefer Poirot to Marple.
mysterious reflective relaxing medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Yes
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Branagh did a good job with the narration - handling the changing accents quite well. And Ms. Christie knows how to spin a good story. 

Loved it! It kept me guessing until the end!
mysterious medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: No

A fun read, this was my first book by Agatha Christie that featured Poirot, a very fun detective character to go with while reading. The writing style is old, you can tell, it didn't bother me that much, but it's obvious this is a book from the 30s.

I was confused a lot at the start. There are waaay too many characters thrown at once (there are 13 suspects!!), and there are a lot of French words and phrases thrown at you, which was a bit distracting to me personally. I wasn't sure if I was meant to understand the French phrases or not!
I was kinda losing interest a bit in the first half, when like 40% of the book was just one-on-one interviews with the suspects, and there are a lot of them, so it took a while. But it paid off, because then hearing the reasoning of Poirot was satisfying.

Not sure I understood all the clues that were presented, such as the
Woman in the scarlet kimono, I am not sure if that was ever explained too well, I guess it was just a plain misdirection.


Overall, I enjoyed the book, the latter half, hearing the reasoning was fun, especially since they provide you with the diagram of the train, all the characters' names written in a list, with described alibis and clues, very cool. I didn't figure it out myself. I am sure it's possible, maybe, but there are so many characters and alibis and times to keep track of, I couldn't keep up. It's better here to just go with the ride and enjoy seeing how Poirot unravels the case :)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings