Reviews

The Lion of Senet by Jennifer Fallon

claracalymayor's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0

wipqozn's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

Absolutely fantastic read. The political intrigue is some of the best I've ever read, and the characters are top notch. Gotta a feeling that when I finish this trilogy it'll be one of my favourites.

cassie_b's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious slow-paced

3.5

It took me a while to get into the story in large part because the audiobook narration was so off-putting. All female characters sound like stereotyped camp gay men, while all children sound like stereotyped simpletons. I kept feeling like I was listening to an outdated homophobic bigoted sitcom. I tried powering through but the story felt quite facile & formulaic so I DNF’d it at about half way. For some reason I went back to it after a break & tried again. 

After a while I began to enjoy the story & was able to skim my thoughts past my displeasure with the narration. By the end I’d become somewhat curious to see what would happen next but not so much that I’ll listen to any more audiobooks read by this voice actor. If my curiosity ever rises to a level where I decide to read more then I’ll borrow the ebook instead.

ngreads's review against another edition

Go to review page

DNF around page 163.

I just can’t get into this. The world is interesting but under-described. The politics lack the mystery and character necessary for them to have any interest. The book is almost all telling and very little showing (or what is told is something we’ve already been shown, rendering the shown bits impotent and useless).

Also, all I can tell you about the character who is arguably our lead is that he’s smart and doesn’t think human sacrifice is a good thing. He’s blandly kind and wants to be a doctor.

He’s about as interesting as a slice of white bread with a hint of butter scraped on top. Sure, he has potential, but there’s nothing to draw me to him.

Also, if a big part of the plot is to have a character grappling with a religion that he believes to be false, maybe keep the facts surrounding that religion as a mystery for a while instead of revealing just about everything within the first few chapters.

Twists don’t generally make or break a book, but mysteries add tension, and tension was what was sorely lacking.

mamap's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

NOT a sweet book. harsh. cruel. scary. and yet, good.

rynnikins's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

lcasswrites's review

Go to review page

adventurous dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

ericbuscemi's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This book caught my attention when I opened the cover flap and saw praise for it from one of my favorite fantasy authors, Robin Hobb. One of the reasons I really like Hobb is that her style is cerebral, with the focus being on the political intrigue and emotional relationships between the characters, rather than hacking and slashing of an evil horde of underdeveloped minions.

Jennifer Fallon's Lion of Senet fit that style and pushed it even further. Where most fantasy involves magic spells, mythical creatures, epic battle sequences and objects of power (even Robin Hobb's to some degree), not a single one of those elements were present in Lion of Senet -- a refreshing departure from a mostly formulaic genre.

Instead, there was an incredibly rich story, many believable characters, all with different individual motivations, and a detailed, complex view of court life. That, combined with the political and religious undertones that shaped the story, was enough to make this book down impossible to put down.

Another interesting note about Fallon's style is her ability to seamlessly switch points of view in each chapter without harming the overarching narrative. In fact, seeing the world through each of the characters -- protagonists and antagonists alike -- helped to give the story more depth.

emilyrainsford's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious

5.0

Now THIS is grown up fantasy!!

This might be a backlist book from 2002 but it was such a dang breath of fresh air to me. I came to this having just finished a "romantasy" arc that read like the fanfic it grew from and followed what seems to be a modern trend of popcorn reads that are far more "roman-" than "-tasy". Imagine my glee upon picking up this book and finding a meaty, elaborate fantasy with solid worldbuilding, political intrigue galore, morally grey characters that are actually interesting and complex, and an epic plotline that DARES you to even GUESS what might come next.

As someone who reads 99.5% female authors, I have found it a little concerning that two of my favourite reads were written by dudes (Empire of the Vampire, and The Book that Wouldn't Burn). Reading this book however, reassured me that the identity of the author had nothing to do with it. What I love is a substantial story with vivid worldbuilding, and characters with realistically human levels of depth and moral complexity.

I have nothing against romantasy as a genre, in fact I enjoy it myself often. But it can tend towards being shallow, and poorly developed beyond all the lusting and smoldering. 

This epic 650+ page read was everything I want from a fantasy. There were plenty of feisty and interesting female characters. It had just the right amount of brutality without feeling gratuitous. It had interesting themes of religion and power.

It also made me realise that I had somehow forgotten that fantasy just means it's set in an imaginary world - that fantasy doesn't actually have to involve magic or mythical creatures.

Somehow I was absolutely hooked on this book and my very distractable self was able to read chapter after chapter after chapter without pause. I absolutely cannot wait to read the rest of this series. And I hope that authors and publishers keep putting out this type of fantasy well into the future!

amiraisas's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.75

This has the dubious honor of being the first book to get a 1-star rating from me in a very long time, but I'm giving it an extra 0.75 because at least it wasn't a slog. It was quick and readable but MAN what I was reading was not for me.