You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

3.81 AVERAGE


A cegueira de sempre.

Memorable quote:

"As I've learned in this job, not only are the people in government never put off by what we judge to be absurd, they make use of absurdities to dull consciences and to destroy reason." -Superintendent

This book was not as engaging as Blindness, but it was still pretty good. The plot did not move as quickly and I had a hard time staying focused. There are very few paragraph breaks and huge parts of the text that are dedicated to the government and are (probably accurately) written in a dry, sort of boring tone. The concept behind the book is interesting. The ending was (as in blindness) a bit abrupt and unsatisfactory. But, looking beyond all that, the concept makes the book worth reading. I would certainly recommend Blindness over Seeing though.
challenging reflective tense slow-paced

El ensayo sobre la lucidez empieza con un evento inverosimil: La votacion en blanco consigue la mayoria. Los votantes de una ciudad sin nombre(como nos tiene acostumbrado Saramago), sin un motivo aparente votan en blanco en la elecciones municipales y esto es un golpe a la democracia segun los politicos de los tres partidos, la derecha el centro y la izquierda. El gobierno organiza una segunda eleccion que es lo que corresponde en esos casos y el resultado sigue siendo el mismo, y es alli donde las cosas se complican.
La novela tiene una trama muy interesante y explora el evento en primera instancia desde la perspective de la clase politica dominante, el presidente el primer ministro y todo el gabinete , tienen reuniones para tomar accion,aveces los dialogos son un poco densos, pero saramago tiene esa habilidad de volver a enganchar al lector con una descripcion de la sitiacion desde la perspectiva del narrador omnisciente y eso le da siempre una cuota de interes a la lectura.
Donde la trama se pone mas interesante es obviamente en los ultimos captitulos, donde ya los presonajes se tornan mas humanos, quiero decir que ya no son los politicos que toman decisiones apresuradas o hasta autoritarias, es en los capitulos finales donde se ve la escencia de lo que se plantea con la situacion del voto en blanco. supongo que cada lector puede interpretarlo de formas distintas, en lo personal me inclino a pensar que las balas no pueden acabar con un ideal.
dark mysterious reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Plot
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
challenging funny mysterious reflective sad medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: No
challenging reflective medium-paced
dark reflective sad tense slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
funny sad tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated