Reviews with content warning for Toxic relationship - Wide Sargasso Sea

Oh boy...

Wide Sargasso Sea is the latest in my quest to read through the "great classics" of Western literary canon, and it's the first one I can truly say I didn't like.

I should start by getting the elephant in the room out of the way - this book is essentially published Jane Eyre fanfiction. Now, that's not inherently a bad thing. The story makes little secret of it and the premise was intriguing. Who was Rochester's mad wife really? What was her side of the story? Sadly, although it does deliver the promised tale, Wide Sargasso Sea fails to offer much to a reader that they couldn't already have figured out for themself.

Antoinette Cosway lives with her mother and disabled younger brother in the crumbling ruins of their family's estate. When slavery was abolished, the family was plunged into near-poverty and rejected both by the freed slaves (who were understandably resentful of their former masters) and the white community (who saw them as both morally deficient former slave owners and as social inferiors). As she grows, the constant feelings of outcast will weigh down her mind and combine with her husband's own problems and lead to madness, infidelity, and a disaster of marriage that threatens to destroy both of them.

I was really disappointed in this book. I found Antoinette to be irritatingly childish and helpless. I know that the lack of agency she has in her own life is kind of one of the points of the book, but for me it moved past that and into "good grief, woman, stop wringing your hands and do something". Her husband, meanwhile kept oscillating between "very reasonable" and "what on earth is wrong with you?" In the end, rather than a portrait of a woman kept down by a cold and unfeeling man, or a tragedy of two hopelessly mis-matched souls, I wound up almost feeling like they deserved each other.

The reason this book got more than two stars (instead of the 1.5 I would have given it otherwise) is the prose. It's beautiful, dreamy, almost stream-of-consciousness stuff that makes every line interesting to read on its own and really captures the almost fever-dream like nature of the story and the lush tropical setting. However, this proves as much a hindrance as a help, with major events often glossed over in favor of more mood setting. There were several important plot points that I was confused on because the writing style obfuscated them so much.

Overall, a book with a promising start and an enjoyable writing style that fails to offer much of substance or deliver on the promised narrative.

Content Warnings

c_dmckinney's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

This book is a prequel to Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. It is an exploration and fleshing out of Rochester's first wife before he changed her name and condemned her to the attic for "madness".

Content Warnings

felicityebhaslin's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

4.7 stars rounded up
Confession time: I’ve never actually read Jane Eyre. I don’t even know what happens. It’s just one of those books that I’ve ALWAYS wanted to read but every time I want to pick it up, I find myself committed to another book first - that one laid on my bedside table with a bookmark half-way through, an assigned reading due this week, or I’m just in the mood for something short and snappy. So, putting my shame of being a pathetic excuse for an English Lit student aside, I’m in the position to contribute living, breathing evidence to the discourse around this book. You DON’T need to have read JE to understand, enjoy and relish this book.

Goodreads reviews for Jean Rhys’s ‘literary sensation’ seem to either be 4-5 stars or 1 star, little in-between. The 1-star-reviews say that without reading JE, they wouldn’t have understood it. Well, here I sit; looks like it’s back to the drawing board. Entitled as they may be to their opinions, their reasoning feels like a cop-out for saying they just didn’t like the book.

I acknowledge the themes of this novel can be COMPLEX. Our main character, Antoinette (later known as Bertha Mason), has a family tree so chaotic I still don’t fully understand it by the end. I wouldn’t blame anyone for struggling to get their head around some of the things in this book, and for that I have to knock off the 0.3 stars. However, everything else this book brings to the table makes up for my minutes of head-scratching.

Themes (apparently suppressed in JE) of race, isolation and hatred weave a disturbing, pitiful tale. What caused her insanity? It’s not as simple as genetics. Does anyone deserve our pity? Or should we feel sorry for them all?

Will definitely reread (hopefully having read JE this time

Content Warnings

asmallgremlin's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Well…I hate Rochester now

Content Warnings

mariebrunelm's review

Go to review page

challenging dark sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

I don't read a lot of classics. School has clearly put me off reading them, and I don't see why I would relate more to a book written a hundred years ago than one written ten years ago. Yet from time to time I'm intrigued, like with Wide Sargasso Sea, which retells the story of Bertha, Mr Rochester's first wife in Jane Eyre.

First of all, the introduction to this book was really well written and helped me make the most of my reading by highlighting a few important themes and setting the scene. It helped me because I have to admit I struggled a bit with the narration to begin with. It feels very much like a dream - I didn't always knew where or when I was, or what was happening. But there was a beauty to the language, and a life, that kept me going. Jean Rhys was from Dominica, and she drew from her culture elements of language which makes the whole prose sing, even though I didn't find it always easy to grasp. As a result, I felt a little detached from the story, but at the same time I felt how necessary it was. This is clearly about flawed and unreliable narrators (we get the story from a few different characters's points of view) trapped in a flawed and unsatisfying relationship.

Rep: white Creole main character.

Content Warnings

bethsicle's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

Content Warnings

seanml's review

Go to review page

reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

A very interesting look into the background of one of literature's most enduring novels. It's been a long time since I've read something with such trippy and intangible language. 7.5/10.

Content Warnings

kaylaej03's review

Go to review page

reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

More...