Reviews with content warning for Infidelity - Stoner

Reviews tagging 'Infidelity'

Stoner by John Williams

21 reviews

raffia's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

Content Warnings

sadiaa's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.75

Content Warnings

reggiewoods's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

William Stoner is proof that you don’t have to be remarkable to have an impact on someone’s life. He’s an ordinary college professor whose career spans both World Wars. While his mundane ways may seem boring to his family and colleagues, Stoner’s pedestrian life makes him all the more relatable and sympathetic. An outsider may consider Stoner unfortunate, but Williams makes us feel his devastation with him. Stoner stands out as one of the more memorable characters in twentieth century literature, if for nothing other than his staunch refusal to compromise his principles. While the narrative lacks action, I didn’t feel that it ever got slow. Despite its heart-rending plot, Stoner simultaneously is a celebration of the everyman and the simple life.

Content Warnings

lief_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.5

Content Warnings

samarakroeger's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

the marital r*pe scenes caught me off guard but I guess it was unfortunately par for the course in those days.

William Stoner is an incredibly awkward and passive-aggressive protagonist. The book is sad, slow, and deeply melancholic as it follows his tiny little life at the University of Missouri during the Greatest Generation. I found him frustrating, but in a way that makes a compelling book.

Content Warnings

wormgirl's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

Content Warnings

klor's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional inspiring reflective sad medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I had to take a few minutes of silence after I finished this book. There's a quietness to it the whole way through and a loneliness, not a bombastic one. The plot doesn't really have a lot going on, we're just following this man's life and yet the writing was so good that I just had to keep going. I honestly got so attached to our protagonist and felt for him through the various unfortunate things in his life

through his failed marriage, to not being able to connect with his parents after going to college, to the shitty bureaucracy in his job, his mentally ill wife emotionally distancing his daughter from him, to not being able to be with the woman who actually loved him

it's not a grand thing or events but damn they hit hard a lot once they enter the picture. Half the time, readers can see it coming and you almost wish that he should stand up for himself but that's just not his character. The love he had for literature is the same love I have for the field I'm in. This story simultaneously made my heart clench and then break and then make peace with it. It's like ribs by lorde but like as an adult lol

Content Warnings

cherryredmarlene's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful informative reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? N/A
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

This was very slow and in depth about different aspect of the life of one character, but that’s EXACTLY what tickles my pickle so good for myself. I can however see how this could be boring for some.

Content Warnings

r_v_apples's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

Content Warnings

sherbertwells's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging informative reflective sad slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

“An occasional student who comes upon the name may wonder idly who William Stoner was, but he seldom pursues his curiosity beyond a casual question. Stoner’s colleagues, who held him in no particular esteem when he was alive, speak of him rarely now; to the older ones, his name is a reminder of the end that awaits them all, and to the younger ones it is merely a sound that evokes no sense of the past and no identity with which they can associate themselves and their careers” (1)

This book is all about disappointment, so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.

John Williams’ novel Stoner has a reputation as an underrated classic; the cover of my Penguin Vintage Classics copy has a nonremovable button hailing it as “The greatest novel you’ve never read.” Its protagonist, assistant professor William Stoner, is a similarly unremarkable. In fact, his life is so standard that the back of the book doesn’t mind giving away most of the plot.

Neither do I. Stoner is born to a farm family in the late 19th century and initially studies agriculture at the University of Missouri before switching to literature and becoming a professor. He makes two friends, marries an upper-class woman with whom he does not get along and struggles to raise a daughter. On campus, he contends against Hollis Lomax, a pretentious colleague. He participates in an affair. He dies in middle age and is forgotten afterward.

Rather than turning the title character’s life into a melodrama, Williams focuses on little moments and low-stakes, drawn-out conflict. His greatest virtue is his accuracy: as a literature professor himself, he has plenty of experience with the minute dramas of campus life, and as a writer, he realistically recreates Stoner’s infatuation with literature. His novel is essentially a love story between man and university.

“‘Have you gentlemen ever considered the question of the true nature of the University…Stoner, here, I imagine, sees it as a great repository, like a library or a whorehouse, where men come of their free will and select that which will complete them…You see it as a kind of spiritual sulphur-and-molasses that you administer every fall to get the little bastards through another winter…But you’re both wrong,’ [Masters] said. ‘It is an asylum or—what do they call them now?—a rest home, for the infirm, the aged, the discontent, and the otherwise incompetent. Look at the three of us—we are the university” (29)

Since my parents are two academics working at a midwestern public university, I had a lot of fun comparing their experiences to Stoner. I can tell Williams nails the experience of having to fail an unrepentant and arrogant student. But, for me, his writing might be too familiar.

I’ve seen the story before.

I’ve seen the ending before in The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet by David Mitchell. I’ve seen the literary enchantment in Confusion by Stefan Zweig. I’ve even seen the rich girl/poor boy dynamic in The Secret History by Donna Tartt. I’m not mad at John Williams for being influential. But I’m not moved by him either.

Stoner is like an empty, dawn-lit corridor of a university library. It is lonely and beautiful, and you will end up seeing it a thousand times in your life. It may be a whorehouse or a clinic or an asylum, depending on who you are. Whether you linger is your choice.

“It hardly mattered to him that the book was forgotten and that it served no use; and the question of its world at any time was almost trivial. He did not have the illusion that he would find himself there, in that fading print; and yet, he knew, a small part of him that he could not deny was there and would be there” (288)

Content Warnings

More...