Reviews tagging 'War'

Ready Player One by Ernest Cline

10 reviews

oliverreeds's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated

4.25

Good book; the portrayals of Shoto and Daito are a little racist; the main character is a pick-me boy and while he does experience some growth, most of it is because of a woman (sexist) and that whole subplot is honestly ridiculous. Like it suits the character but christ it’s a little excessive and he never faces any repercussions for his obsessive nature. We also never see a developing care for the outside world which realllly makes the love interest feel like a moral hospital for a promising young man. The world building is exceptional and the characters are all believable. I think the theme of race really gets trampled on//doesn’t get enough attention in the novel. It felt like an after thought, like the character was made to develop Wade into his final form. He’s the hero but he also sucks a lot. Also, there’s a paradoxical idolization of the creators or OASIS (rich) who honestly do and did so little to help the real world despite their vast sums of money (the reason why some characters want to win the game in the first place — to save the world). idk. the whole thing felt half-baked in terms of ideology but very strong in terms of character personas but weak in terms of character development

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

voldycat's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful inspiring lighthearted tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

danka66's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny hopeful inspiring lighthearted mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bookmark3brodi's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny lighthearted mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

_nem_'s review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny mysterious fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

This is my go to book whenever I'm in a reading slump. I can just whizz through the pages and it gets me excited about reading again. I like how there are almost two stories running in parallel with real life and the world inside the OASIS. The world building is amazing and could be expanded on so much as well. I like the puzzle aspects as well and how it isn't immediately obvious to the characters what the solution is. 

I didn't understand all of the 80s references but that didn't take away from the book. Everything was explained so you could know what it was without having come across that media before. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

goldenslug's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

zakcebulski's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

0.25


Yeah, this book is not for me. This review is going to be very... very ranty and more than a little discombobulated. This review is also going to be VERY vulgar, so, if you are sensitive to that, then please do not read.

 
I read this book 10-11 years ago, and I remember loving it. I found a used copy and I thought it would be fun to go through this one again and relive some of the feeling that I loved back in the day. Now, I don't know if I read it more in depth now, or, if I have just matured a bit in general. But, holy fuck dude, this book is soooooo not for me.

First, I cannot stand Wade- the main character. This dude is fucking insufferable if not for anything more than his general temperament and his weirdly manipulative incel like reaction to rejection?
He confesses his love to another character- Art3mis- and she does not reciprocate the feelings- sure, a bummer, but, a totally normal thing.
Wade then talks about how "winning the money is more important to her than he is", which is just the most manipulative shit around. And then, when she talks about how she could save the world if she won the OASIS he replies "how fuckin' noble of you". Dawg, are you serious?
And, what the fuck is up with the talks about this dude being a virgin? Stop? He is 18 in this book- why is this a point of discussion more than once? Why is it a fucking discussion point at all? Who gives a shit? Just... stop?
I don't understand the obsession with people's obsession with virginity- but, whatever at this point.
And, Wade has, one of the most incelliest incel comments in the history of incel behavior- "The female of the species has always found me repellent."
What.
The.
Fuck.
I am going to go ahead and put this out there. If every girl you talk to does not like you... then you are the problem.
FUCCCCCK I hate Wade.
Do we want to fucking discuss how he talks about using a fucking sex doll? And how he references to a passage in this stupid ass book he uses as a guide for life about how James Halliday also masturbated alot and so it's fine? What a weird fucking inclusion, Cline. 

I absolutely cannot stand the amount of pop culture references within this goddamn book.
We get it. 80s. The. FUCKING. NINETEEN. MOTHERFUCKING. 80s. DO YOU GET IT?? Holy shit. This book came off as little more to me than an overindulgent masturbatory exploration of Ernest Cline's love for the 80s where he just proves that he knows so fucking much about the 1980s you wouldn't even believe it. And, it is every fucking page. It is just written in such an unbelievable way, too. Some super obscure thing from the 80s? Oh you bet your bottom dollar that our boy Wade knows exactly what it is because, I mean, obviously he does. This guy is SO fucking cool and SO fucking prepared! Hell yeah Wade. GODDAMMIT.
This shit is so fucking annoying is just where I am at when I think about this fucking book. How flippantly people talk about this stuff "oh, what're you doing" "Just brushed up on some old- coin ops". Fuck. Off. The amount of eye rolling I did in this book is beyond compare. We are really, truly supposed to believe that an 18 year old kid has the entirety of fucking WarGames memorized? Jesus Christ.
When Aech and Wade "flex" their knowledge on another gunter (don't even get me fucking started) it is the most cringe inducing scene fucking hell.
But, the worst scene is by far... by fucking FAR when Wade opts to go and fucking stalk Art3mis after they stop talking and he send her flowers and all of this shit and then goes to her castle complex and holds a boombox over his head to play "In Your Eyes" by Peter Gabriel because- what's that? You guessed it.... MOTHERFUCKIN 80s REFERENCE, FUCKER- it might be one of my least favorite scenes in books this year.
This shit could have been so fucking cool. But, it wasn't, it missed the mark so much by fucking flooding so many goddamn references to the 80s to the point where I wonder why Ernest Cline didn't just write a book entitled "The 80s: A Cultural Exploration" because that is clearly what he wanted to write.

And why... why why why why why why why why why why why was Aech's big reveal of being a black lesbian a reveal at all? I guess the whole idea is to say "people feel like that can't be themselves", but, really? That falls flat when this is a big reveal that is not at all explored at all. Goddammit. What a piece of shit "twist" this was. To me, it doesn't come off as representation if it is a bait and switch like did Cline really think "hmm, I am going to get the readers to love this character and then reveal him to be a her" and think that that counts as representation? It really rubs me the worst kind of way.  
And Art3mis? Could have been such a great character, but you know what we should do instead? Relegate her to love interest, stalking target and lady in need of a big strong man aka mother fucking Wade to come through and use his brain knowledge about the fucking 1980s to show how fucking RADICAL he is. And, I am giving absolutely zero fucking points for Wade accepting Art3mis even though she has a *GASP* port wine birthmark. She is described as  Pro-tip- accepting someone for their appearance doesn't make you an absolutely wonderful person.

I am going to go on record and say that having a billionaire die and leave 240,000,000,000 not to the starving people of the world, but rather hidden where it might never be found is the pinnacle of why we should eat the fucking rich. I don't know why this should be lauded? The guy had the means to kinda sorta even START to unfuck parts of the world and instead he opted, posthumously, to say "good fucking luck you little peasants!". I fucking loathed this goddamn plot. Ohhhh the big bad guy works for a big bad corporation? Get it? Do you get it? DO YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND??? CORPORATIONS ARE BAD! 
We know. We fucking understand what you're saying.
There are authors who have re-written scenes and whole portions of books so that they can undo or rectify a plot hole.
The dude Ernie C? Nahhhhh can't be fucking bothered doing that. This guy has no time- he has to tune his boombox while waxing his fucking DeLorean while reciting the entirety of The Breakfast Club while voting for Walter Mondale while listening to Madonna because fucking 19 goddamn mother fucking 80s!
Instead, our guy? He has an ace up his white jacket sleeve from the Thriller album cover- Deus Ex Machina. 
Need to get out of a pickle? Don't want to do the work to make things make sense? EZ PZ just have an extra life granted for a perfect game of Pac-Man! No one else in the history of the OASIS did that? DON'T QUESTION IT! 
Need some hyper obscure 1980s knowledge to get you out of a jam? Well, luckily for me, I actually can recite every moment of the 1980s from memory because I studied it all while bored one day, so, I have it! 

If there is one thing I can commend Cline on it is his complete and unabashed dedication to the death of subtlety. This book read as the worst fucking kind of overindulgent gatekeeping fanfiction masquerading as a book. 
I hated this book, I think that much is clear. 
I need to stop writing before I have a goddamn conniption. 
Fuck this book. Don't waste your time with this trash. This may legitimately be my least favorite book I have ever had the displeasure of reading. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

leigh13's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mblanke's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional hopeful inspiring mysterious sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

random19379's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging funny mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...