Scan barcode
lizzye33's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Sexual content
Moderate: Cursing and Medical trauma
Minor: Body horror, Chronic illness, Panic attacks/disorders, Violence, Stalking, and Alcohol
khymihr's review against another edition
4.75
Minor: Violence, Trafficking, and Injury/Injury detail
kendra_taylors_version's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Sexual content and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Panic attacks/disorders and Abandonment
Minor: Violence and Alcohol
samchase112's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Graphic: Cursing, Sexual content, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Violence and Dementia
Minor: Physical abuse and Sexual harassment
cady_sass's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.0
2. Other main character had her first kiss with Jake Jagielski
3. First date at a record store
4. “Pick me” speech in the rain
This definitely isn’t one tree hill fan fiction but there are way too many odd similarities. I mean, Jake Jagielski???? Lmao
(this was 100% a hate read)
Graphic: Cursing, Sexual content, Violence, Alcohol, and Injury/Injury detail
mezzoanddolce's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual content, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Dementia
Minor: Violence
things100's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.0
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Violence
pikapikachu's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
🤍 The sweet friendship that blossomed between Rosie and Lucas
🤍 The time that was taken for the two characters to get to know one another.
🤍The slow burn chemistry
🤍 How the characters from the first book were still present in the second book.
🤍 Really I just loved how these characters got to know each other through these dates, and how they tied into Rosie’s career. It was sweet, swoon-worthy, and I know that I will come back and enjoy reading this book again.
A few things that I wanted more of:
- I wished Lina and Aaron had been more present in this book. I feel like they were really secondary, and I wished that Rosie would have been more open with her relationship with her cousin.
- I think I wanted to know how Rosie’s book ended up doing and if it was received as well as the first one. The book ends and we know that Lucas is working on self healing and moving on, but I wanted to know where Rosie was at!
Overall, this was a really lovely romantic comedy, and I would recommend it to anyone who was looking for a sweet, lighthearted low stakes romance book. Can’t wait to read another book by Elena Armas!
Moderate: Sexual content
Minor: Violence
izziepng's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
SPOILERS AHEAD
There was ABSOLUTELY NO REASON that Lucas and Rosie couldn’t be together other then that his visa was up. AND SHE CONFESSED HER FEELINGS AND HE WALKED AWAY, asshole.
But anyway they could of been together from the VERY BEGINNING there was NOTHING holding them back.
that’s all that’s why it lost a star because I feel like there should of been a reason that they couldn’t of been together.
I loved that it was dual POV and wish all books were. I love male POVS in books.
Graphic: Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual content, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Dementia
Minor: Violence
aqtbenz's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Violence