Reviews tagging 'Hate crime'

A Little Life by Hanya Yanagihara

225 reviews

julianareynolds's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

asphodel04's review against another edition

Go to review page

I stopped reading this a few years ago and tried to never think about it again, so the date is an estimation. I got around 100 pages in, realized how unequivocally fucked up it is, and stopped, which was probably one of the best decisions I ever made (the worst being starting it). I know my triggers very well. I am very rarely wrong about what I think I can handle. I read the warnings for this book - as a list, it does not prepare you for it. I got to a scene that sent me into a PTSD episode of self-victim blaming and never touched it again - hell, I didn't even finish it, and I know it gets worse.

This book is trauma porn. I don't even agree with that phrase as a concept because of how it gets used to criticize survivors. But as one, this is trauma porn. There is a difference between writing a book that does not have a happy ending, and that reflects the often-true reality of living with a disability, with PTSD and other assorted mental health issues, with not being okay, and with writing a book that exists solely to torture not just its characters, but its readers.

Yanagihara is also not someone who should have written this book. Quoting here another review [@ellereadsomebooks on GoodReads (https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3529182954) and Instagram, who provides a much more in-depth, less angry review]:

     "• yanagihara does not believe in trigger warnings. she believes that it is “very dangerous to isolate  oneself from information or art or history or news because the subject is painful”. trigger warnings are there so people do not experience severe mood/mind altering trauma when abruptly encountering something they are affected by. and in a little life, there is a plethora of things to be triggered by.

      • she also does not believe in therapy. this led me to wonder if there is a connection between this fact and that one of the worst villains in the novel is a psychiatrist. i believe there is.

      • she stated she did not research the psychological background or trauma responses of jude, the main and most traumatized character, at all. she said that “jude came to her fully formed”."

I highly recommend reading Elle's full review, but I also want to respond to this, which she wrote in the same review:

"one cannot be so reckless when writing subject matter like this. because these are real problems for real people. just because they are fictional characters doesn't make it any less real. writing about child sexual abuse or suicidal thoughts should come with responsibility[...] what is her message out there to readers, real, living, breathing people, who are survivors of similar if not the same things as jude? what is the greater meaning? yanagihara said herself that she wanted to write a character who never gets better. there you have it.  it is the reader that suffers the most." (emphasis my own)

What I got out of my 100 pages I tolerated of A Little Life is that Yanagihara simply does not acknowledge the lives of real, living, breathing people who are can understand Jude on a chilling and horrific level. In a Guardian interview with Tim Adams, she responded to a question regarding the photographic inspiration for the book by saying:  “Photography is always a kind of stealing,” she says. “A theft from the subject. Artists are assaulters in a lot of ways and the viewer is complicit in that assault. In the same way with the book. I hope readers feel a sense of entanglement in these lives; they are bearing witness to them but there is also something quite intrusive about that.” Not only does this flat-out confirm that it was Yanagihara intended to make her readers suffer, it (along with the rest of the interview) shows the morbid way she views and depicts the lives of real people's suffering: as a tool for her art. 

TL;DR: Fuck this book. Don't read it. It's exploitative trauma porn. Content note/trigger warning: Yes. Everything. The warnings I have listed on this review are only the ones I read or know for a fact appear. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

riella_reads's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

This is such a hard book to rate, because I didn't exactly enjoy my time reading this. I originally picked this up 2 years ago and got about 100 pages in. It was a little overwhelming with the different POV's and I couldn't get them straight. I kept telling myself I would pick it back up but I never really wanted to. I am glad I finally got around to it, though. While this was such a sad and tragic story and it is labeled as "trauma porn" (I don't disagree with this label either), it is also beautiful. The sadness and misery of one person who can't stand to be alive, who feels so unloved he isn't even worthy of life will stay with me a long time. There isn't much to say, but if there is anything to take away from this book is that you are always more loved and cared for than you could possibly know. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

madgoosie's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jessietn's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

This was impeccably well written, one of the most well written books I’ve ever read. Although it is a very long book full of difficult content, I found it easy to become absorbed in the writing and read for more than 100 pages at a time (before promptly taking a mental health break for a couple of days..).

Yes, this story contains many horrifying and unflinching accounts of abuse, as well as self harm. It was not enjoyable to read these, but I wouldn’t personally classify it as misery or torture porn just because they exist. In my opinion, the author felt that they were necessary to adequately explain the extreme behaviour and suffering of the main character. I would also add that abuse is a very real problem and that by reading about it we might learn how to better help survivors.

To me, this story was mostly about the failures of masculinity. It’s difficult to review it fully without spoilers, so spoilers now follow.
The ultimate tragedy was the failure of Jude’s friends the help him. He had a wide support system of friends, found a family, and a doctor he could rely on. But all of them were men (with the exception of Julia, who is largely absent in the text; Ana, who is dead; and a handful of side characters) and despite their genuine love and affection for Jude, they fail again and again to realise the true extent of his pain, and/or to respond in an emotionally appropriate manner. The default response to Jude’s self harm was anger and frustration, directed towards him, only exacerbating his problems. It isn’t that they did not care enough, only that they were emotionally ill equipped to help someone who was hurting deeply (even Andy, the doctor, who should know better but treats Jude more as a friend than a patient). Of course, Jude was clever and hid everything very well from all of them (until Willem) but there should have been too many signs for them to collectively ignore.

My main criticisms were that I found the abusive counsellor plot line to be somewhat far fetched - it’s not that something like that happening isn’t probable, only that the writing in those parts felt weaker and less believable - and that I did not immediately believe Willem’s romantic feelings toward Jude. I also didn’t feel that he would have needed sex so much that he ignored the very obvious reluctance of his partner to have it - this was out of character to me, not to mention painful to read, and one of the times when it felt the story was veering slowly toward misery porn. It was a relief to read him realising his own “wilful naivety” later in The Happy Years.


Overall, I thought it was an incredible book with so much love, but more heartbreak, and some very important takeaways. Check in with your loved ones, and don’t always believe them when they tell you they’re fine.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

juliacolley00's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

satana17's review against another edition

Go to review page

sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
no sé qué decir de este libro, la verdad. no sé si me ha gustado o si lo he odiado a muerte, solo quiero dormir y ya está 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

denisescoffeebreak's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

This book broke me, but I knew what I was going to get from the get go and I think that’s where many people have trouble with this book.
I think it was written beautifully, at some point it wasn’t reading but almost like watching the scenes of a movie right before my eyes.
We know from the start of the book that Jude is such a troubled character and that really does make you affectionate to his character - he isn’t against recovery, he just can’t excuse it for himself, he grew up learning to only allow pain in his life and that itself it’s such a difficult thing to unlearn. 
There wasn’t any need for William to do a proper coming out, even his relationship with Jude didn’t really revolve around their sexuality but the respect and trust in each-other, so why is there a need to specify their sexuality? who cares. 
The book was indeed very very heavy on the subjects but in my opinion it was expected - I think it’s not a reason to bash the book, that’s low key what it is known for, it is not an easy read, which is why I (like many others) suggest you check the trigger warnings before reading. 
I sometimes had to put down the book to take a big breath but that’s what made me like it even more, it touched me enough to have a physical reaction lol.
One thing I didn’t like it’s yet another representation of a toxic gay love story, although again (sorry) expected in this book (that I know it’s not known for it’s”love story” though, which is good). 
Anyways five starts because it really touched me and I couldn’t put it down. :)

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

teeps360's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

epiderma's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings