Reviews tagging 'Sexism'

The Lost World by Arthur Conan Doyle

4 reviews

abijoupansy's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

Beautifully written. Extremely racist. Some of the science is fun to research and fact-check. Amusing protagonists. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

carolinebl's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous lighthearted slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No
Don’t be deceived by the dinosaur on the cover; this book is not about dinosaurs. You will find annoying, racist, imperialistic men (and ape-men), but hardly any dinosaurs. Along with the unlikeable white men, the most ‘positive’ characterisation of a person of colour was that of Zambo, who was portrayed like a loyal dog. I enjoyed the stylistic choice of letters to an editor, but this book just got slower… and slower… and slower, until around 3/4 way through. The politics may be ‘of its time’, but this novel was boring - which is unexpected for one supposedly about dinosaurs.
I’d rather have read a novel about Gladys seeking glory of her own. Also, the title is way better than the characters own naming abilities - Maple-White Land??

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

arxchiell's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

mordshunger's review

Go to review page

adventurous funny slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

When I was a child I borrowed the audiobook from the local library. It captured my imagination (I had a strong Jules Verne phase) and I'm happy to say it still feels a lot like that - the book is self insert adventure fiction (for Victorian men). It's childish, exuberant, simple, rascist and sexist wherever it can (I see you, head-shape connoisseurs!).

It ain't a Holmes, but it is a Doyle.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...