The original 1798 version without the preface. Certainly consolidates, in my mind, Coleridge as the better poet among the two.
challenging dark hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated

The first edition's genesis was not as meticulously planned, as some might believe, and yet, the book is very cohesive, and all poems in it are up to a certain standard. I prefer Coleridge to Wordsworth, but still, both are rightfully outstanding poets in the English literary canon.

Although I like nature, which Wordsworth goes on about ad infinitem, I found Wordsworth himself to be rather bossy, which diminished my enjoyment of his writings.

they're okay
dark emotional mysterious reflective relaxing medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: N/A
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

poems were very very hit or miss for me. some definitely need a couple more rereads to understand but others i think were just not good? i dont know. i love romantic era poetry and lyrical ballads is a keystone collection, but i expected more.
emotional hopeful inspiring mysterious reflective relaxing sad slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Yes

It's interesting how modern the romantic poetry sounds. Yes, there's a bit more rhyme and metric, the language sounds old, but the structure still strucks as modern. Most of the poems were very narrative, with a focus on the emotional world of their characters. The lush descriptions of nature also resound to a modern audience worried about what we will lose as climate disaster approaches.
challenging hopeful inspiring lighthearted reflective relaxing medium-paced

truly amazing so glad i read. fav poem was probably "Seven"
emotional hopeful inspiring lighthearted reflective relaxing sad fast-paced