Scan barcode
classicsandcatnaps's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
4.0
Minor: Sexual content, Suicide, and Murder
zophronia's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Moderate: Alcoholism, Child abuse, Suicide, Death of parent, Fire/Fire injury, and Alcohol
Minor: Animal death
temi1008's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
Graphic: Emotional abuse
Moderate: Child abuse and Death
Minor: Suicide and Death of parent
lenelivesloudly's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
The story is told jumping between different characters over the course of 30 years. While this is good on one hand as it enables us to see how all the different people influence and experience the night circus, it’s also really difficult to get a good sense of what makes our main characters tick. If you are like me and need very fleshed out lovable characters to get into the story this one will not be doing it for you. Celia and Marco are falling in love but because the writing is so distant, to me it just felt like they were suddenly out of nowhere head over heals for each other in the middle of an otherwise very slow paced book. It wasn’t even slow burn. Just no burn while they build these nice magical tents for each other and suddenly a flame. I just couldn’t really get myself to care about them. Other characters like Bailey and his part in the overarching story were a lot more immersing to read about but he also didn’t have a lot of depth. I think part of it is the mysterious aura of the book that would suffer if the characters became too real? On a positive note I still found the balance between the different simultaneously told stories very well done and never wished for a scene to end quicker so I can go on to the other characters as it is often the case for me with this kind of split storytelling.
Then there is the problem with the ending. The magic system in The Night Circus is very soft and for us readers it’s not at all predictable as to what is and isn’t possible. That is good, that is necessary so we can feel this sense of awe and wonder which makes this book so unique, the circus so mysterious. But it also makes finding a satisfying solution to the main challenge of the story very difficult and is in my opinion one of the main reasons to why it failed to do so. Our main characters found themselves in this difficult position of having to play this game they barely understand the rules of and cannot get out of unless they finish it. So while the stakes kept rising the question that kept me reading on was how they would manage to get out of it. And yes I got the answer to that question but oh well. Meh.
Just for anyone who hasn’t read the book: Celia and Marco are raised since they are like 5 years old by their respective parent figures to play a game to prove who is the better magician and therefore I guess who is the better instructor. The rules are never really explained to them but within the limits of the night circus they have to enhance it magically (for example adding another tent that has some magical attraction within) without interfering with their opponent. At first Celia doesn’t know that Marco is her adversary, then after she finds out they fall in love. They realize at some point that not whoever creates better magical circus additions wins but rather that whoever cannot endure the pressure of all that magic anymore and dies loses. So now the problem is they are both bound to the game and must finish it but are also integrally connected to the circus (because of all the enhancements) and all the people who belong to the circus on such a basic level that if one of them dies the circus will probably die with them. Celia then tries to untangle herself from the circus and make it more self-sufficient before she wants to sacrifice herself so Marco (and the circus) can live. What his plan is is not explained to us but it also doesn’t matter because out of nowhere a character that knows all this decides Celia is taking too long and basically forces/convinces Marco to sacrifice himself first and it has to be now. Her reasoning is that Celia is more important to the functioning of the circus and therefore Marco should die, true but like why now. Why not wait until he is less entangled either it’s not like either of them has any problem with leaving the other to run things. They are both good with dying for their love.
It just feels very forced to get to the showdown. Very convenient for the plot but weirdly sticking out from the slow flow of the first 90% of the book.
Some magical concepts like binding and „becoming free from the physical world“ are well set up and foreshadowed but the way they were used to actually resolve the problem was a bit. I don’t know. Random. Could have been any other set of magical shenanigans. So Celia saves Marco and herself from the explosion that was supposed to kill him and does an advanced version of what her father did and dematerializes them both. Now they have the problem that the circus is in some kind of time standstill and only Bailey a teenager can save them and the circus by binding himself to it. Why any of that is necessary the way it is done and happens is not clear to us. Like I said: very soft magic system, no explanations given. I don’t know how that could have been solved any better. In a way it makes sense because both her specialty physical magic (in this case dematerializing) and his specialty binding are needed and they both and up neither dead nor alive so they could end the game both neither winning nor losing. But it’s kinda whatever. I don’t care enough about the characters to find poetic beauty in them ending up leading tragic half lives in that dematerialized state.
But all that is not my biggest problem with the story. Throughout the book I was enraged on behalf of Celia and Marco for all the emotional (and sometimes physical) abuse they had to endure. On behalf of everyone connected to that circus really. For being forced to play their roles in this stupid game that exists for no reason, that completely disregards the agency of every single one of them, uses them as „players“ and „extras“, seeing them as expandable. A few characters died for this game. And the instructors who are responsible for this, these age old wizards are just doing this for what really? Funsies? I wanted them to get what they deserve, I wanted them to not be able to repeat these games ever again like they have so many times before. But we didn’t get that. This is just not that kind of story. I think the book is very pointedly letting this happen, ending like this, with Celia and Marco not as losers but also definitely not as winners and there parental instructor figures living on as some kind of indestructible emotionless soulless beings. I get it. I think. But I don’t like it.
Is what I would have said if there wasn’t this nice part at the end where we learn that Marco is grateful because hadn’t it been for his instructor matching him with Celia he wouldn’t have met her. How sweet. And completely fucked up.
Graphic: Child abuse
Moderate: Suicide
jenijenocide's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Minor: Suicide, Death of parent, and Murder
saradoxical's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
Graphic: Child abuse and Emotional abuse
Minor: Suicide and Death of parent
tays_books's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.5
Graphic: Child abuse, Self harm, Blood, Murder, and Alcohol
Moderate: Death, Suicide, and Fire/Fire injury
Minor: Infidelity, Sexual content, and Death of parent
faithss's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
4.5
Graphic: Self harm and Suicide
ramakn22's review against another edition
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Child abuse, Torture, and Violence
Moderate: Confinement, Suicide, and Abandonment
vhispas's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.5
Moderate: Death, Suicide, and Murder