Scan barcode
sarahehsan's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Miscarriage
ontheoffbeat's review
1.5
The author's note and the social movement that the author chose to focus on for this book were both intriguing and garnered my excitement. The movement in question is the early women's equal rights movement that began at the tail end of 18th century going into the 19th century. Pioneers of this movement included Mary Wollstonecraft, author of The Vindication of the Rights of Woman, and the leading inspiration behind the protagonist of The Rakess, Seraphina Arden. Unfortunately, Seraphina did not come close to capturing the fervency of Wollstonecraft. This rakess remained cold, robotic even, throughout the entire novel. If there's one thing that this gender-swapped experiment of the trope proves it's that no matter what gender they are, a rake(ss) is still an ass. Her love interest, a Scottish architect by the name of Adam Anderson, likewise was poorly-written. His trauma from losing his wife and baby in childbirth is not handled carefully and instead came off as quite silly and melodramatic. It reminded me of the character writing of Anthony Bridgerton, whose fears also came off as silly and not the sources of turmoil that they were set out to be. I would hope authors and editors would go through more care in properly exploring the trauma of these characters while also bridging this gap of understanding between the modern audience, who live in a society where modern medicine has solved many health issues that would have been a death sentence two hundred years ago, and the characters of Regency England, who would not have such luxuries in their lifetime. This book also contains one of my least favorite tropes ever.
Overall, The Rakess set its target high but did not hit the mark.
Graphic: Alcoholism, Miscarriage, and Sexism
Moderate: Animal cruelty and Animal death
Minor: Forced institutionalization
friends2lovers's review against another edition
3.5
“Fucking is rarely inconsequential.”
- The Rakess has a much stronger cast of secondary characters than The Duke I Tempted. Seeing how Adam and Sera interacted with their friends and family really helped flesh out their characterization.
- The feminist themes are interwoven with the story well. Peckham is aware of and acknowledges the historical setting. She does not ignore the legal and social constraints on the female characters during this time period. Nor does she shy away from depicting the consequences when they attempt to circumvent them.
- Sera was allowed to make mistakes, but always recognized them as such and apologized or made amends. I expected her to be one of those “strong female characters'' whose bad behavior is excused or forgiven simply because she’s a woman. Thankfully, I was proven wrong.
- Despite the feminist themes and the heroine-centric story, Adam is not emasculated or belittled in order to elevate the heroine. Often times, an author’s approach to a “feminist” romance involves taking the hero down a peg or two, perhaps to symbolize destruction of the patriarchy. Peckham does not resort to that at all.
- The narrator, Sienna Francis, was fine. I would listen to her again, but won't be actively seeking her out. I found a review on AudioGals that puts into words what bugged me about Francis: “repetitive intonation.” Every sentence was delivered with the same flat modulation. This was a detractor for me, but not a major one.
- In one of the top goodreads reviews, the reviewer criticized the book for a lack of sex positivity, but I personally found it to be refreshing. Peckham depicts all the complexities of sex. Both the hero and heroine have to find a balance between pleasure and risk. The reason I chose the opening quote that I did is because I think it encompasses the underlying theme of vulnerability in the story. For further reading on this topic, I recommend Tomorrow Sex Will Be Good Again: Women and Desire in the Age of Consent by Katherine Angel. I think about the book often, especially when reading romance—a genre which mirrors, in its portrayal of sex and sexuality, the consent culture that Angel is critiquing.
Heat Index: 4.2🌡️🌡️🌡️🌡️
Graphic: Addiction, Animal death, Alcohol, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Sexual content, Child death, Cursing, Death, Miscarriage, and Pregnancy
Moderate: Grief, Bullying, Forced institutionalization, Abandonment, Sexual harassment, and Misogyny
Minor: Suicidal thoughts
felicitydisco's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Miscarriage and Forced institutionalization
Moderate: Alcoholism
ticktock's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
Graphic: Alcoholism, Animal death, Child death, Death, Grief, Miscarriage, Misogyny, Pregnancy, Sexism, and Sexual content
mcmizzie's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Miscarriage and Misogyny
circe813's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Miscarriage, Sexual harassment, Sexual content, Forced institutionalization, Alcoholism, and Misogyny
Moderate: Abandonment, Animal death, Animal cruelty, Blood, Bullying, Emotional abuse, and Grief
fleainabox's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
Graphic: Alcoholism
Moderate: Miscarriage
isotope_s's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Alcoholism
Moderate: Death of parent, Child death, Miscarriage, Misogyny, and Infertility
Minor: Abandonment
jessiewolf's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Confinement, Forced institutionalization, Grief, Miscarriage, Sexism, and Toxic relationship