Scan barcode
readingwmiles's review against another edition
4.0
i loved this! it definitely dragged on a tiny bit like 3/4 through but i loved hating these characters and loved the butch/femme rep.
03hannahleigh24's review against another edition
dark
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
sleeprunreadrepeat's review against another edition
challenging
funny
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
danimylove's review against another edition
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
0.5
almost made me want to be straight.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual content, Infidelity, and Blood
I pinky promise it isn't even worth a hate-read.joensign's review against another edition
challenging
dark
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Toxic relationship, Blood, Body horror, Torture, Sexual content, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Infidelity and Fatphobia
Minor: Excrement
xmccx's review against another edition
dark
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.5
tscott907's review against another edition
3.25
This shit was wild (honorific? derogatory? I’ll never know.) I laughed!
calicos's review against another edition
It seemed like it was supposed to be funny but it just…wasn’t. It felt like when people try to rec a book by saying “it has queer rep!” but fail to answer the more important question, “okay, but is it good?”