Scan barcode
emscji's review against another edition
4.0
5/2/2013: Every time I read a Banville novel, I am both more fascinated AND more frustrated. What the heck is he doing?! Well, something right, since I keep coming back. I think his most amazing skill is his ability to control. His tone, his pacing, his ability to make a scene or a character pop with one image, his dark sense of humor--every word, phrase, detail, is exact and right. Which is not to say the writing is spare; no, Banville knows how to use repetition and epithet brilliantly.
So...how is that fascinating and frustrating? Because while the words and descriptions are precise and clear, what he is describing is not clear at all. Yes, I could tell you the plot…sort of. The Godley family gathers at the patriarch's bedside after he suffers a stroke and appears to be dying. The action takes place in one day. And most of it is narrated by Hermes, who is having a grand old time watching, manipulating, and laughing at the mortals who inhabit the novel.
So…the problem? I might have thought I just wasn't reading carefully, but many of the reviewers' adjectives back me up: TI is "mysterious", "haunting", "ingenious", "mischievous"--and my favorite, "downright strange". Banville toys with the concept of self: the gods inhabit certain characters for their own purposes (for short periods); the narrator is often a blurred merger between two characters; the father and son are both named Adam (which is not always notable, but it is here!). He plays with the concept of time, pushing it forward and back. And of course space is also elastic.
But even all of that isn't what is frustrating. It's more Banville's way of not letting me in on his joke. Is the novel funny? Well, no, it's mostly quite poignant; the mortals are all clueless, thrashing about in their lives, never able to figure out what is going on. But the gods understand! And just as they are explaining, just as I think I'm getting it, they snatch away the logic, the rational construct that could make it all make sense. Which, I suppose, is the point. And the joke. I am only a mortal, after all! So I will keep reading Banville, keep trying to get it. We'll see!
So...how is that fascinating and frustrating? Because while the words and descriptions are precise and clear, what he is describing is not clear at all. Yes, I could tell you the plot…sort of. The Godley family gathers at the patriarch's bedside after he suffers a stroke and appears to be dying. The action takes place in one day. And most of it is narrated by Hermes, who is having a grand old time watching, manipulating, and laughing at the mortals who inhabit the novel.
So…the problem? I might have thought I just wasn't reading carefully, but many of the reviewers' adjectives back me up: TI is "mysterious", "haunting", "ingenious", "mischievous"--and my favorite, "downright strange". Banville toys with the concept of self: the gods inhabit certain characters for their own purposes (for short periods); the narrator is often a blurred merger between two characters; the father and son are both named Adam (which is not always notable, but it is here!). He plays with the concept of time, pushing it forward and back. And of course space is also elastic.
But even all of that isn't what is frustrating. It's more Banville's way of not letting me in on his joke. Is the novel funny? Well, no, it's mostly quite poignant; the mortals are all clueless, thrashing about in their lives, never able to figure out what is going on. But the gods understand! And just as they are explaining, just as I think I'm getting it, they snatch away the logic, the rational construct that could make it all make sense. Which, I suppose, is the point. And the joke. I am only a mortal, after all! So I will keep reading Banville, keep trying to get it. We'll see!
featherbooks's review against another edition
5.0
Banville's writing is as good as anything I have read since Saramago (and his is in translation). A wonderful, imaginative deathhbed romp!
wvunderink's review against another edition
2.0
The intriguing setup of The Infinities, involving Greek gods overseeing and interfering with the lives of a modern-day family faced with the imminent death of its patriarch, drew me to the book but left me frustrated at its execution. The story is primed for some Olympian hijinks wreaking havoc on the unsuspecting Godley family -- because we know the Greek gods are a sex-crazed, jealous, vindictive sort -- but the gods' roles are so minor as to be irrelevant. We're left with a half-baked family drama without a proper ending.
Adding to the book's frustrations is its narration, which is supposedly from the point of view of Hermes. It so easily slips between third- and first-person -- inhabiting a range of characters' minds (including a dog and a near-comatose old man) while repeatedly reminding us that Hermes is relating their thoughts to us -- that Hermes' role, again, becomes irrelevant. I've got nothing against narrative omniscience, but the way it plays out here feels careless.
The great mystery of Benny Grace never fully resolves -- he just leaves suddenly, toward the novel's end -- and the slapdash happily-ever-after ending does not satisfy. Banville is much better than this.
Adding to the book's frustrations is its narration, which is supposedly from the point of view of Hermes. It so easily slips between third- and first-person -- inhabiting a range of characters' minds (including a dog and a near-comatose old man) while repeatedly reminding us that Hermes is relating their thoughts to us -- that Hermes' role, again, becomes irrelevant. I've got nothing against narrative omniscience, but the way it plays out here feels careless.
The great mystery of Benny Grace never fully resolves -- he just leaves suddenly, toward the novel's end -- and the slapdash happily-ever-after ending does not satisfy. Banville is much better than this.
lesserjoke's review against another edition
1.0
This story of the Greek god Hermes narrating the events surrounding a modern patriarch's deathbed is unbearably pretentious and unforgivably cruel to its characters. Add to that an utterly inconsequential plot and I just couldn't wait to be through with it.
kdrmbroms's review against another edition
3.0
Classic Banville, this time with Ancient Gods thrown in for good measure. The usual themes of love, death and tenuousness, but somewhat lighter than times past. Plot line as faint or fainter than ever.
jooniperd's review against another edition
4.0
I think I read this too fast, by which I mean, I am sad the reading of this book is finished. Banville is in a category and class all of his own.
More...