Reviews with content warning for Violence - Nosferatu

Loved it. Wild ride from start to finish. Going into the book I expected it to be about a vampire, given the title, but I didn’t expect the type of vampire I received. Insanely creative work of fiction with fun easter eggs to King’s work in the latter half of the book.

I think one of my favorite parts, was the clever call-out to Chekov’s Gun. Maggie having the paperweight gun was one thing, but when she told 14-year-old Vic about the “escape route” from the library (and Vic rightly saying “why would I ever need to get out of here in a hurry), I never would’ve expected that line to pay-off in the final chapters. The paperweight served as a great reminder that if a gun is shown in act 1, it better go off by the end of the story— and boy did it go off.

Great book.

Content Warnings

seershlen's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

jessicalarson125's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? No
Loveable characters? No
Diverse cast of characters? No
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

This book was long. Honestly… I was bored a lot of the time. It felt extremely wordy and not in a good way, like I feel like half of the novel could have been cut out and it would have still had the same story and achieved the same effect, just more concisely.

The first 1/4 ish was interesting, and I was intrigued about where the story would go. The middle 1/2 seemed to drag on and on and on and I wasn’t enjoying any of the characters or their decisions or motivations. The last 1/4 got my attention again. But when we’re talking about a nearly 1000 page book (~20 hour audiobook), for around half of it to be laggy, that’s a lot of time and energy that I felt was wasting my time.

BUT HONESTLY — the worst part for me was the fact that this novel was an obvious and glaring example of men writing female characters. This is a literal quote from the book in the perspective of one of the main characters, a woman:

Men, she thought, were one of the world's few sure comforts, like a fire on a cold October night, like cocoa, like broken-in-slippers. Their clumsy affections, their bristly faces, and their willingness to do what needed to be done - cook an omelette, change lightbulbs, make with hugging - sometimes almost made being a woman fun.

It’s so completely tone deaf to the actual overall experience of being a woman that it took me right out of the story, I actually let out a startled laugh and rewound the audio to make sure I heard correctly. I probably should’ve taken it as a sign when the same female main character, as a teenage virgin, wanted to get a tattoo of a motorcycle engine on her chest to “let the boys know what a good ride she was.”

Overall:
Audio: 5/5, the narrator was incredible, she was literally the only thing that made this book not feel like a waste of my time
Characters: 2.5/5, I didn’t really like any of them tbh and I’ve already discussed my issues with the women
Plot: 2.5/5, I actually had more issues with the plot besides that it felt way too drawn out (in my opinion). The concept of the “real” world versus the imaginary (“inscape”) world was fascinating. It was also an interesting take on vampires and I thought that was really clever. It just kind of felt like there were a lot of revolving parts that made the story overly convoluted.

Also, I’m a medical professional and some of the medical/injury/surgical (especially) aspects of this book lowkey pissed me off haha

~~~~~~~~~

halfway update: I’m bored. Idk I just don’t really care about any of the characters and this book is SO long. I for sure would have given up a long time ago except that the audiobook narrator is FANTASTIC.

And like, by no means would I consider myself a prude but there are just so many gratuitous and crude mentions of genitalia (the same issue I have with King’s work) and like oh my god, we get it, you’re obsessed with “mommy tits” but we don’t need to hear it again!!! And again!!! And again!!!

Also I feel like at this point if I’m reading a horror novel and there’s a dog in it, I should just dnf. I’m sick of the dog dying in overly graphic and disgusting ways. Especially when half the time it doesn’t even do anything for the plot. But as soon as that dog dies the book is like immediately a 3 star (or less) read for me lol.

Content Warnings

rinitealeaf's review against another edition

Go to review page

I really wanted to like this book, I really did.
It started well, idea was good and I enjoyed Joe Hill's other two books I've read.
But alas, I was disappointed.

Some of the characters felt really icky, I mean yes it's a horror book but..
And around when Vic met Lou I started to have doubts that I would not finish this.
Joe Hill was so focused on telling us how fat Lou was and how his dad was fat and it was just Jesus Fuck. I counted that on one page the word "fat" was mentioned like 5 times..
(I don't understand how it's added only as "minor" CW by the users here 😒🤔

Good idea, some good characters but poor writing couldn't save.
I got to 51%, final nail in the coffin was when Manx

killed the poor doggie 🤬😭

Content Warnings

iamastraythought's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark hopeful sad tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Character
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.25

God this book took me forever to read but I have to say it was a joy.
If Lou hadn't made it I would have been pissed. I think the end honestly saved the entire book for me, watching it all come together was delightful.

Content Warnings

More...