Reviews tagging 'Drug use'

Kiss the Sky by Krista Ritchie, Becca Ritchie

20 reviews

fallnginluve's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

i don't find rose and connor an attractive couple generally. i didn't enjoy how connor essentially forced rose to "submit herself" so that she could fulfill one of his fantasies. i also didn't enjoy how connor excused pedophilia by essentially saying, "daisy is mature, so any relationship with anyone older is fine." it's weird and gross.


i didn't like connor in this book at all. he was better when he was a side character with barely any lines.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

emily_grace2007's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

6 ⭐️

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

breaklikeafish's review against another edition

Go to review page

fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

0.5

I think this might have been the worst book I have ever read. However, I also want to note that reading it was an experiment and an attempt to read outside my comfort zone, so maybe that's not a huge surprise.

The characters were okay, for the most part, excluding all scenes in which the men were seemingly competing for the title of Most Toxically Masculine Alpha Male. Sadly, that was a lot of scenes. There were so many moments where the women had to be saved by some knight in shining armor, and I was decidedly not into it.
Just as an example, there was a bit of a rat problem going on in the house, and this was leading man Connor's reaction:
„Lo, Ryke, and I can set rat traps tomorrow.” But I add this just to rile her, “The perks of having three men living under one roof.“
Is there a specific reason why only men can set up rat traps? Do rats react well to testosterone?
Or is Connor just really that much of a dick? The answer to the last question is definitely yes since he spends a large part of the book fighting for his girlfriend's virginity with a guy she is not even remotely interested in. This is portrayed as cute and honorable. I personally couldn't help but wonder why Rose and Connor agreed to live with the guy when both of them seem to be genuinely scared that he will rape Rose??? Like what? Please go to the police instead. In fact, I'm pretty sure Rose and Scott's first meeting already contains enough sexual harassment to press charges. Needless to say, all interactions with Scott and the insinuations that he might take what he wants without asking made me deeply uncomfortable.
Also, Scott brings Rose food one time, and she immediately wonders whether she's misjudged him?? Is she really that stupid? No, obviously not, but Scott, Connor, and even the narrative itself treat Rose like a prize to be won and not a person.

Staying on the topic of being deeply uncomfortable, why is Daisy, a sixteen-year-old, continuously sexualized?
I appreciate that everyone in the book seems to realize that teenage Daisy dating a adult man in his early twenties is problematic. However, nobody seems to have a problem with Ryke being interested in her?
„It’s okay to like her.” Hell, I like any guy that makes my sister happy and treats her well. Julian does neither.“
What's the message here? Grooming is bad unless the guy is your sister's boyfriend's brother?

Even ignoring all of that, I did not find Rose and Connor's relationship cute at all. One major conflict is that
Rose doesn't want kids, but Connor does, and instead of talking about it and breaking up due to different plans for their respective futures, Connor pressures her until she agrees to have children with him. It would be different if it was Rose's own internal character development. She's in her early twenties, and of course she's allowed to change her mind about things. What bothered me was that Connor never seemed to take her perspective seriously. From their first conversation about it on he seemed absolutely certain that he could change Rose's mind about it. That's not how having children works! You can't change someone else's mind about a topic like that.
But Connor seems to have no problem pressuring people into doing what he wants.
He also pressures his therapist into prescribing him drugs (what kind of therapist would do something like that?! I get that he pays you, but you're the professional in this context, please act like it) and his girlfriend into having sex with him. Yep. It's like that. I hate Connor.

It is by far not my biggest concern with this novel, but I still was annoyed at the incredibly heteronormative mindset with which it was written.
Just as an example, at one point, Rose thinks about how she would be more comfortable having sex with a woman than a man. This thought is not further explored, or even taken as any indication that Rose could identify as anything other than straight. Something similar happens when Daisy explains that she doesn't really enjoy sex, and instead of validating her (very valid!) feelings, Rose says:
“And that’s ridiculous. [...] You can orgasm[.] [...] You just have to find the right person.“
And later:
„Oops. Tact. I lose it sometimes. “You’ll find someone,” I tell her, squeezing her shoulder encouragingly. But I think I squeeze a little too hard because she winces. I let go. “…Just keep dating. And when you find a loser, ditch him quickly. Please.“
That is genuinely such terrible advice.

The only positive thing I have to say is that Lily and Lo were actually kind of cute together.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

hollymileham's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

aw this one is my fave so far, the academic rivals to lovers arc between rose and connor is so good. did not see that ending coming
scott can die

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

toriibrooke33's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.75

Predictable. Repetitive. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

amanda_mh's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional funny hopeful inspiring mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Rose and Connor have captured my heart!!!! I love this series. The drama was amped up this book with the unexpected celebrity status! And omg it was everything getting to know rose and Connor and be in the minds of them was so fascinating! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

moonyleo's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful lighthearted sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

they bewitched me

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ecravens's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful tense fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

salome8512's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional funny informative tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bookbishes's review against another edition

Go to review page

tense
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings