Scan barcode
closteroven's review against another edition
5.0
(9/10)- Nothing like a good Stephen King book to pull me out of a reading slump. There may have been a few bumps, but I really liked this. I liked the characters and the internal struggles they were dealing with. I found the portrayal of grief as realistic as possible to my understanding (I can’t necessarily relate to it but I think this book did it better than many). I really liked the father/daughter dynamics, they were adorable. The plot was interesting, if a bit slow (but it’s always a bit slow for me, that isn’t really a bad thing). Some of the elements of the story didn’t come together super duper smoothly, but it still worked. I especially enjoyed the ending, which explained everything that happened and what’s going to happen in a realistic setting without seeming to go into it too much. It still left me with some questions, and it left me hoping for a (very) belated sequel, which isn’t likely but it could be possible. Overall this was a great book. It was recommended to me over two years ago, before I’d even started reading King, and I’ve finally gotten around to it and found it really good. I’m glad I read it.
bealiliwen's review against another edition
dark
emotional
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Racism, Racial slurs, Rape, Gun violence, Murder, and Child death
jimhart3000's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
tobin_elliott's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Five books into my Great Stephen King Re-Read (2024 Edition), this was a novel I was sincerely looking forward to revisiting. Like DESPERATION before it, I remember truly loving this book the first time around.
Unlike my re-read of DESPERATION this one didn't disappoint. I loved this one all over again.
I was amazed at how much of the story I'd forgotten. I had the opening few chapters clearly, but, by the time Noonan got to Sarah Laughs, I'd forgotten damn near all of it. I'm kind of glad I did, as it allowed me to basically re-read it and experience it much like the first time.
There's so much I loved here. The horror was quite subtle for the first three-quarters, allowing King to also examine Noonan's relationships with Jo, with Matty, with her daughter, with the extended family and townspeople, and while I'm sure some readers found it somewhat self-indulgent and "that crazy Stevie overwriting again" I found it essential to how the story played out.
On top of that, King's examination of grief was given the space it needed to breathe, which I appreciated. I find that, in stories, it's given short shrift, making it feel like it's felt and dealt with in a couple of weeks. It felt real here.
The other aspect I loved—and I'm guessing it's something more that authors would respond to—was King's portrayal of Noonan's creative process and the writing process in general. In fact, it was kind of killing me and every time King brought it up, I kept thinking that I should be writing.
Was it a perfect book? No, but very few are. But did King grab me pretty much from the first page and hold me until the last one? Hell yes.
I was going to say this is one of his best "latter year" novels, but looking at my shelves, it's very clearly closer to the middle output. But he was having a fairly solid streak, with the one-two punch of GERALD'S GAME and DOLORES CLAIBORNE, then ROSE MADDER (a book that I feel has been undervalued), then THE GREEN MILE, DESPERATION, and now this one.
But this particular one? This is one I point to when asked why I love Stephen King.
Unlike my re-read of DESPERATION this one didn't disappoint. I loved this one all over again.
I was amazed at how much of the story I'd forgotten. I had the opening few chapters clearly, but, by the time Noonan got to Sarah Laughs, I'd forgotten damn near all of it. I'm kind of glad I did, as it allowed me to basically re-read it and experience it much like the first time.
There's so much I loved here. The horror was quite subtle for the first three-quarters, allowing King to also examine Noonan's relationships with Jo, with Matty, with her daughter, with the extended family and townspeople, and while I'm sure some readers found it somewhat self-indulgent and "that crazy Stevie overwriting again" I found it essential to how the story played out.
On top of that, King's examination of grief was given the space it needed to breathe, which I appreciated. I find that, in stories, it's given short shrift, making it feel like it's felt and dealt with in a couple of weeks. It felt real here.
The other aspect I loved—and I'm guessing it's something more that authors would respond to—was King's portrayal of Noonan's creative process and the writing process in general. In fact, it was kind of killing me and every time King brought it up, I kept thinking that I should be writing.
Was it a perfect book? No, but very few are. But did King grab me pretty much from the first page and hold me until the last one? Hell yes.
I was going to say this is one of his best "latter year" novels, but looking at my shelves, it's very clearly closer to the middle output. But he was having a fairly solid streak, with the one-two punch of GERALD'S GAME and DOLORES CLAIBORNE, then ROSE MADDER (a book that I feel has been undervalued), then THE GREEN MILE, DESPERATION, and now this one.
But this particular one? This is one I point to when asked why I love Stephen King.
labunnywtf's review against another edition
1.0
I'm not setting in stone that I will never try again to read this book. But I got about 1/4 of the way through the audiobook, then pulled up the miniseries, and proceeded to skim heavily through that, as well.
I cannot bring myself to give a shit. NEXT.
I cannot bring myself to give a shit. NEXT.
christinawelc's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.25
phillysaurus's review against another edition
dark
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Can King write a book without the N-word?
Enjoyed this one. Was a bit bloated though, and parts of the climax didn’t fully make sense or were hard to follow. Classic King, not a this strongest, but still a good yarn. Ayuh.
Enjoyed this one. Was a bit bloated though, and parts of the climax didn’t fully make sense or were hard to follow. Classic King, not a this strongest, but still a good yarn. Ayuh.
sarahetcetera's review against another edition
3.0
King writes a book about writer's block while having writer's block...
tricapra's review against another edition
4.0
Now that I know this book isn't 46 hours long, I like it way more. Way to lie to me, audiobook player.
Also, wow, what a gut wrenching story. This isn't "usual" King, but this is King at the top of his game. Never particularly scary, just horribly upsetting.
Also, wow, what a gut wrenching story. This isn't "usual" King, but this is King at the top of his game. Never particularly scary, just horribly upsetting.