Scan barcode
hann_cant_read's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
To start, I really did love the prose and the vibes. It was beautifully written, and the descriptions were poetic. It felt like the setting itself was another character.
It was pieces of the plot that I had more trouble with. Not even plot holes, just like "oh, that's it?" moments.
Reid really did a great job setting up for a fantastic story. I think the initial plot line of
But then, nothing else really happened. There were some super interesting side plot setups:
I did like that for awhile we're really not sure if Effy is crazy like everyone thinks or if the Fairy King is real, because even she isn't sure.
Some questions I do still have that people might be able to answer for me:
1.
2.
3.
Moderate: Misogyny and Sexism
Minor: Bullying, Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Suicide, Death of parent, Sexual harassment, and Classism
s_wandering's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.5
Pros:
- the writing style from Reid has always been great
- the general plot was interesting
- the first 50 pages were intriguing
- the main characters Effy and Preston (outside of their romantic plot)
- the connection of
Euphemia's trauma to drowning / the event that happened in the south really was done exceptionally well
Cons:
- at the beginning its said "this is a love story" and with that in mind it felt in the haste to get these characters to fall in love it was forgotten that us as readers were just now meeting them for the first time. Their love story felt rushed, held no real weight and we could've done without it all-together
- the plot became unclear, untidy, drawn out and though
the drowning was interesting- it became clear after some time it would only ever really be explored as a metaphor - I don't mind unreliable narrators but Effy was unreliable to an unforgivable point, I think this would've benefited being told by Preston's POV or at-least dual POV
- so many things were introduced to set the scenery (war, timeline, characters) but never expanded on to actually provide proper world building and after 300+ pages I feel like I spent time in a world I could not identify in a line up
- for a book about academia, the characters aren't that smart
to sum up the reading experience from my book club "a bit bored but intrigued"
Graphic: Child abuse, Mental illness, Misogyny, Sexual assault, Schizophrenia/Psychosis , Sexual harassment, and Classism
willofaleksander's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
4.5
- (note: i tend to focus on things i dislike but all gripes were truly minimal. this book did feel very special and it was so beautiful to read.) i have some gripes about the marketing in the US as a dark academia YA tho. it is fully a gothic fantasy and more suitable imo to new adult genre (ignoring the conflation of these markets)
- the atmosphere building is so strong and vibes are so on point, for lack of better word lol. who can resist fairy tales and introspection on the ambivalent nature of the ocean...i think im trying to say that the mythology of the world was very effectively established and really built the kind of atmosphere i personally enjoy. lots of intrigue. the snippets of the primary texts and academic works engaging with those before each chapter were *chef's kiss*
- with that said, certain details really did not end up mattering or feel necessary. the war is established in the background but ends up not having a bearing on anything, other than for effy to see preston as the other. the war could have easily not existed and effy could still retain the antagonism she initially has. the sleeper museum (so cool) does not end up being relevant either. i can understand it emphasizing the prevailing legacy of emrys
and the weight of interrogating and destroying that but it ultimately did not need to be as much of a detail as it was. i can also see how it adds to the mythology of the world though but the politics of the north and south felt muddied at times too. the north seems to have all the financial capital but the south has such a strong cultural hold that feels at odds with its conquered past? unless im interpreting this incorrectly. - i do think the character work overall could be stronger. they all felt one degree off from being fully dimensional.
unfortunately, i think angharad suffers the most from this but her omission makes obvious narrative sense. i still feel that the climax struggled to be exciting since she became a sort of figure that showed up to fix everything. but. i also feel like rather than a character, she most of all, is moreso here to represent the main theme of the story - which is fine. there's a balance im thinking of where she herself is so physically absent from the book but the mystery is uncovering her truth and just reflecting on if that did justice to her overall from a narrative aspect. i think it did? - i personally prefer showing over telling and i feel like the ending was a little heavy handed/spoon-feeding the message but i also think that is fine.
- romance-they are very cute but preston being an exception to every man sucking in her life and never feeling like a threat to effy isn't enough to establish something to me. too convenient? this is defs a small point though because they really were so cute to read. i loved their banter and preston is really so sweet to her. i also can defs accept that he's just hilariously and loudly non threatning in an almost weenie way where i want to pinch his cheeks and call him a nerd.
- i do adore effy and the portrayal of her experiences
as a victim of csa was really good and complex. her fear and panic in her day to day felt real and oppressive. i really felt for her and enjoyed her arc and development over her changing feelings towards angharad as the mystery unfolded. truly the bravest girlie out there for having to question her comfort media. the comfort and true solace she found in the end was so heartening.
Minor: Child abuse and Sexual assault
hello_kara's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
0.25
“Midnight was a fairytale thing. She didn’t know if Preston had been thinking about that when he promised it. But Effy was remembering all of the curses that turned princesses back to peasant girls as soon as the bells struck twelve. Why was it always girls whose forms could not be trusted? Everything could be taken away from them in an instant.”
“I suppose that’s partly why I don’t have much faith in the notion of permanence. Anything can be taken from you, at any moment. Even the past isn’t guaranteed. You can lose that too, slowly, like water eating away at stone.”
I liked those quotes, that’s about it.
World building was a bit confusing, and it was difficult for me to pin down a time-setting. Advertised as “Part historical fantasy, part rivals-to-lovers romance, part Gothic mystery.” It’s set in a fantasy UK inspired world, maybe from the 60s? 🤷🏼♀️ There’s trains, cars, universities, tanks and guns, CT scanners, phones, but also folk magic and changelings. Their country in the South is at war with the one in the North, for unknown reasons. Universities admit women, but they really only go to get husbands and aren’t allowed entry into the one discipline reversed above all others that Effy actually wants to study: Literature. Her scores were so good she should have gotten in, but because of misogyny she wasn’t admitted. She goes and studies Architecture instead (apparently the second most prestigious discipline.) As it so happens she is the ONLY woman in that college.
Graphic: Bullying, Child abuse, Death, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual assault, Xenophobia, Gaslighting, Abandonment, Sexual harassment, War, and Classism
cyoussi's review against another edition
2.5
Graphic: Child abuse, Racism, Rape, Sexual assault, Colonisation, and Classism
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship, Racism, Rape, and Classism
gmberbaum's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Graphic: Child abuse and Sexual assault
deidrebrin's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Graphic: Adult/minor relationship, Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexism, Sexual assault, Death of parent, Abandonment, and Sexual harassment
bookishde's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Minor: Child abuse, Sexual assault, and Death of parent
amandaaahyde's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
"I was a woman when it was convenient to blame me, and a girl when they wanted to use me."
Moderate: Child abuse, Emotional abuse, Mental illness, Misogyny, Panic attacks/disorders, Sexual assault, Violence, Grief, Death of parent, Gaslighting, and Dysphoria
Minor: Medical trauma
It's never explicitly stated, but the main character struggles with PTSDnozycozy's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
Graphic: Child abuse, Misogyny, and Gaslighting
Moderate: Sexual assault