Reviews

Grimus by Salman Rushdie

bigfrog's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

I have a hard time saying this is bad, but it doesn’t mean I think its good.

whimsicalmeerkat's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

Painfully bad. In many cases, I like people's first works, but not this time.

popefacekillah's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

tani's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

Ugh. Disliked the main character. Didn't care about the story. Writing was good, but didn't make up for everything else. Also, having women around only so that the main character can have sex with them? Definitely not the way to win me over. Just sayin'.

tanninsandtales's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Turns out that crap Rushdie is still quite good.

vanessar's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This is not your usual kind of Salman Rushdie book. There are magic potions, conjurers, big stone frogs, gates onto other worlds and a fair few nutcases. The main character, an American Indian granted immortality and now wanting to get his death back, is kind of boring. The people he meets, especially Virgil, are mildly more interesting, but the book only really gets going around the middle section, when our hero, Flapping Eagle, is in the town and involved with other people. When he's struggling through various parallel dimensions in a bid to get to the all-powerful Grimus and argue his case for mortality, it gets bizarre and arbitrary and I turn off. But then, I'm not a sci-fi fan so it had its work cut out from the start.

mrears0_0's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.5

self indulgent

portlandcat's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

It took me a long time to get through this one - only for the die-hard Rushdie fans, I think.

cb613's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

lostinthefunhouse's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted medium-paced

2.0