You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.7 AVERAGE
3.7 AVERAGE
While the writing itself is unexpectedly lyrical, the subject matter is unrelenting and harsh. It makes for an interesting juxtaposition. I'm glad I read it, but I can't say that I actually enjoyed it, if you know what I mean.
The Yellow Birds is a war book that is about more than just war. It is about friendship, following orders and adjusting to life after war. Although it is a quick read, I found my thoughts wandering throughout. Some will find satisfaction with it, but not many.
Really liked the structure and the shifting between terse sentences and lovely prose (if occasionally overwritten). Something about the characters' relationships and the story didn't crystallize for me though; I also can't help comparing it to Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk and Redeployment, which I thought were much better.
This book changed forever the way I think about the color yellow. It used to be a bright, happy, optimistic color, but now I see all of its ugliest connotations. It's amazing how beautiful the writing of this book was even as it was about a brutal subject. I was focused on that, which is perhaps why it took me so long to read. The action of the book was slow-paced as well, so that probably had something to do with it. In any case, the writing was amazing, but parts of it felt belabored, so it's a four instead of a five.
It's a mercy Kevin Powers' Iraq war novel The Yellow Birds is not longer than its scant 225 pages. That's not because it's dull or slow or poorly written. No, it's a good thing it's not longer because it's often hard to read and draining — it deals with the psychology of soldiers at war, and that's a tricky thing. Had this novel been longer, it could've felt long-winded and easily lost its way, like soldiers in the dark.
But as is, it's a chilling illustration of how shattering war can be for kids in their late teens and early 20s. No one is adequately equipped for the psychological toll of war, but especially not kids. So one of their coping mechanisms is to turn the terrible to mundane. After watching an old woman get shot, and a young girl trying to drag her from the road, our narrator, 21-year-old Private Bartle muses: “I was not surprised by the cruelty of my ambivalence then. Nothing seemed more natural than someone getting killed…We only pay attention to rare things, and death was not rare.”
Chapters alternate between war scenes in Iraq (it's 2004, and the soldiers are fighting in and around the small fictional city Al Tafar) and post-war Bartle, who has returned to his hometown of Richmond, Va., and trying to comprehend the war. Before shipping out, Bartle promises a young private's (named Murphy) mother that he'll watch over him, and deliver him back safely — of course, an impossible promise. Murphy is an 18-year-old country boy, who doesn't quite understand what he's getting himself into. And as the effects of the war break him down, Bartle's promise becomes increasingly difficult.
Where this novel really succeeds — and why it was a finalist for the National Book Award, no doubt — is in diving into how these characters rationalize the war; how they come up with psychological justifications to help them deal with the stress. For instance, at the beginning of the novel, Bartle explains that he and Murphy assume that anyone who is going to die is, essentially, predestined to die. So there's no use worrying — if there's a bullet with your name on it, there's nothing you can do.
The novel also succeeds because of its poetry — Powers writes with power and grace, simultaneously; each page, practically, includes a way of describing something that makes it as clear as if Powers had plopped what he's describing down in front of you. (Example: "When the mortars fell, the leaves and fruit and birds were frayed like ends of rope. They lay on the ground in scattered piles, torn feathers and leaves and the rinds of broken fruit intermingling.") And there's even a few pages of stream-of-consciousness — another example of how the stress of the war wreaks havoc on these characters' psyche.
This certainly isn't your typical war novel — you don't often hear war novels described as "inexplicably beautiful," as Ann Patchett does on one of the cover blurbs. But it is all the things that make up a good war novel, specifically, but just a good novel in general. Definitely recommended!
But as is, it's a chilling illustration of how shattering war can be for kids in their late teens and early 20s. No one is adequately equipped for the psychological toll of war, but especially not kids. So one of their coping mechanisms is to turn the terrible to mundane. After watching an old woman get shot, and a young girl trying to drag her from the road, our narrator, 21-year-old Private Bartle muses: “I was not surprised by the cruelty of my ambivalence then. Nothing seemed more natural than someone getting killed…We only pay attention to rare things, and death was not rare.”
Chapters alternate between war scenes in Iraq (it's 2004, and the soldiers are fighting in and around the small fictional city Al Tafar) and post-war Bartle, who has returned to his hometown of Richmond, Va., and trying to comprehend the war. Before shipping out, Bartle promises a young private's (named Murphy) mother that he'll watch over him, and deliver him back safely — of course, an impossible promise. Murphy is an 18-year-old country boy, who doesn't quite understand what he's getting himself into. And as the effects of the war break him down, Bartle's promise becomes increasingly difficult.
Where this novel really succeeds — and why it was a finalist for the National Book Award, no doubt — is in diving into how these characters rationalize the war; how they come up with psychological justifications to help them deal with the stress. For instance, at the beginning of the novel, Bartle explains that he and Murphy assume that anyone who is going to die is, essentially, predestined to die. So there's no use worrying — if there's a bullet with your name on it, there's nothing you can do.
The novel also succeeds because of its poetry — Powers writes with power and grace, simultaneously; each page, practically, includes a way of describing something that makes it as clear as if Powers had plopped what he's describing down in front of you. (Example: "When the mortars fell, the leaves and fruit and birds were frayed like ends of rope. They lay on the ground in scattered piles, torn feathers and leaves and the rinds of broken fruit intermingling.") And there's even a few pages of stream-of-consciousness — another example of how the stress of the war wreaks havoc on these characters' psyche.
This certainly isn't your typical war novel — you don't often hear war novels described as "inexplicably beautiful," as Ann Patchett does on one of the cover blurbs. But it is all the things that make up a good war novel, specifically, but just a good novel in general. Definitely recommended!
dark
emotional
tense
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
What are the crimes of a soldier? Powers novel doesn't quite answer the question, but it's lyrical and haunting and had me hooked. Sometimes, though, the poetry was heavy-handed. Bartle seemed too lost to live. I never quite suspended disbelief. How did Murph get lost too soon? Did the Iraqis have souls? What about the Germans in the whore house? Why did Sterling not pay the same price as Bartle did?
Cuando leí 'Por quien doblan las campanas', me sentí mal con respecto a las opiniones generalizadas. La mayoria de la gente (por fortuna, puedo decirlo) no conocemos el rostro de la guerra y, en ese libro, me quedé con la misma sensación que tenía antes de leerlo. Lo siento, eso percibí.
Con Los pájaros amarillos fue diferente. Desde el principio, olisqueaba dejos de barro, hierba y sangre. El paso del pasado al presente me atrae demasiado y fue eso quiza lo que causó mas impacto entre los hechos narrados en el texto y la forma en que afectan al protagonista (y a mi, por supuesto).
Y es que, reitero, ir a la guerra es morir con el botón del nitro presionado (lo imagino y agradeceré demasiado si me retiro del mundo con esa percepción, algunas personas no podemos lidiar con la locura multiplicada por mil).
Excelente libro, excelente.
Con Los pájaros amarillos fue diferente. Desde el principio, olisqueaba dejos de barro, hierba y sangre. El paso del pasado al presente me atrae demasiado y fue eso quiza lo que causó mas impacto entre los hechos narrados en el texto y la forma en que afectan al protagonista (y a mi, por supuesto).
Y es que, reitero, ir a la guerra es morir con el botón del nitro presionado (lo imagino y agradeceré demasiado si me retiro del mundo con esa percepción, algunas personas no podemos lidiar con la locura multiplicada por mil).
Excelente libro, excelente.
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated