Reviews

Boxer, Beetle by Ned Beauman

thisisstephenbetts's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Hugely imaginative and pretty darn satisfying story revolving around a violent and amoral Jewish boxer and an effete British eugenicist in the mid-1930s. There's also a segment of the story set in the modern day, where a Nazi-memoribilia collector gets drawn into uncovering their story. It's a black comedy, with overblown characters, and very funny situations.

While the plot is densely woven and generally very satisfying, some portentous-seeming details end up not leading anywhere, which I felt a trifle dishonest. And his prose meanders freely across the dividing line between evocative and over-written. Generally though, this was a big, fun, boisterous read.

tempse's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

maria70's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

I tried. Got 75 pages in and just didn't care what happened to the characters. Rare that I don't finish a book but this is going in that pile

kurwaczytaj's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Kniha je debutem spisovatele, který se narodil v Londýně a v současnosti žije v New Yorku a byla ve výběru na Guardian Best First Bok Award a Desmond Elliot Price. U nás kniha vyšla ve světové knihovně Odeonu.
— Děj knihy se odehrává ve dvou časových rovinách. Jedna (ta ze současnosti) nás zavede do podivného světa sběratelů relikvií Třetí říše a ta druhá nás zavede do časů, kdy byl nacismus teprve na počátku svého vzestupu a my se budeme pohybovat mezi jeho stoupenci z řad britské aristokracie i proletariátu. Kromě pozapomenutých figurek jako byl Oswald Mosley si připomeneme i různé divné teorie, hnutí a vědecké teorie jako byla eugenika.
— Hrdinové starší časové roviny jsou židovský boxer Seth Hříšník Roach a aristokratický entomolog Philip Erskin. Hříšník je takový židovský Tomáš Řepka ale s tělem tolkienovského trpaslíka ale bez vousů a předkožky, který má asi díky tomu, že z něho agrese a sebevědomí přímo sálá obrovský úspěch u žen a ještě větší u mužů. Erskin je jeho pravým opakem – zdegenerovaný aristokrat, který si vymýšlí vlastní jazyk a sní o tom, jak bude šlechtit lidskou rasu jako dostihové koně.
— Také hrdina novější větve vyprávění je hodně bizarní postavička. Kevin Broom pomáhá bohatému sběrateli nacistických militarií vyhledávat a kupovat nové exempláře do jeho sbírky a také je touto vášní postižený. A nejen sbíráním různé svastikou poznamenané veteše – má jednu poměrně vzácnou nemoc, která mu znemožňuje pohyb mezi lidmi a proto tráví většinu času na internetových fórech věnovaných Třetí říši.
— V závěru se osudy těchto tří postav propletou a ještě k nim přibude tajemný hitman z Walesu. Při čtení této postmoderní knihy se čtenář dozví obrovskou sumu bizarních a zbytečných detailů, zajímavostí a faktů. Kniha je napsána košatým jazykem a čte se moc dobře. Děj knihy pádí jak tankista na piku a pokud nemáte problém s líčením trochy toho homosexuálního sexu, tak by se vám mohl líbit. Doporučuji všem těm, kteří mají v knihovně knihy autorů jako je William Seward Burroughs, Chuck Palahniuk nebo Michel Houellebecq .

ury949's review against another edition

Go to review page

This is one of those books where I'm thinking to myself, how did anyone ever come up with this story? It's unique to say the least. I wouldn't call the book humorous, although there are some funny lines and ridiculous scenarios. Also good to know - I could see this book offending lots of different people in a variety of ways. I wasn't offended, but I'm a rather difficult person to offend. The ending is unrealistic and contrived, but this book is more about the journey than the destination.

I was a big fan of [b: The Teleportation Accident|13255419|The Teleportation Accident|Ned Beauman|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1338543718s/13255419.jpg|18456704] and plan to check out his newer books.

themarce's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Book written by somebody under the age of 25

mxd's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced

1.0

stacialithub's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Eh. I guess reading the rave reviews & the initial dark humor/strange premise pulled me in, but the book did not sustain the pace, imo. So, it was ok overall but not quite what I had hoped for.

The initial tone of the story, the Mel Brooks-esqe style of telling horrible history with a wicked grin, a cheeky remark, and a blade between the ribs, pulled me in. But, the story got more somber (& a bit more brutal & more gross) as it moved along (no surprise, I suppose), but I found the ending kind of weird & disappointing in relation to the start of the book. I really enjoyed the wicked humor in the first half. The rest, not so much. And, really, it just lost its momentum. Plus, with a story like this, I feel like I should come away with a stronger moral from the story, or a stronger feel of the stupidity of man, or something... but, that's not really there either. It just, sort-of, ended.

I don't have a bug phobia, but if you do, I'll put the caveat out there that you probably don't want to read this book (though you would probably avoid it on the title & cover art alone).

suncoyote's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The premise of this book was better than the execution. You read the back and think, "What! How crazy and interesting!" But, unfortunately the key emotional entanglement between Philip and Sinner is framed around this rather paltry "murder mystery" that Fishy has to investigate; it was probably added to provide a character that we could consider likeable, which is ridiculous since we see so little of Fishy that we can't really care about him and the two character we do see a lot about are rather despicable. Philip's homosexual repression is so intense it turns to Nazism, so you know, he's balanced and healthy. Then, Sinner is basically a psychopath, so you know he brings a touch of tenderness to the tale. Without Beauman feeling any tenderness towards his characters he doesn't write them very sympathetically; we don't get enough backstory to understand their pathologies, so all we can do is fault them for them.

I'm gave the story three stars in part because I feel comfortable saying this was a rather original plot. The idea is downright engaging. I'm going to keep my eye on Beauman if he keeps up with the good ideas perhaps his characters will align better with his storytelling in a future story.

jwmcoaching's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

4 1/2 stars. This is a near perfect, incredibly exhilarating read. I read Beauman's second novel, The Teleportation Accident, last year and it had a great premise, but the execution was merely good, not great. This, however, which was his debut, is a real rush. I can't really describe it very well other than to say that it involves beetles, Nazis, Jewish boxers and a dual narrative. It's fantastic, so just trust me on this one and read it.