Scan barcode
mijtje's review
dark
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
TL;DR
Story good, characters bad
Boyne is very good at taking a small idea and creating it in something great and unique. This book is a good example. He managed to get me so pissed at the characters that I had to put the book away for a few days. Good work!
It’s amusing and managed to keep my attention. But it’s also a little predictable when you know that Boyne likes drama. The characters are also upsettingly one dimensional. For most, their personality can be summarised in one word. The main character was the most frustrating; I couldn’t find any redeeming qualities whatsoever, which made reading the book feel unrealistic and infuriating. I get that Boyne wants me to hate him, but do it in a smarter way. No one is this horrible.
Story good, characters bad
Boyne is very good at taking a small idea and creating it in something great and unique. This book is a good example. He managed to get me so pissed at the characters that I had to put the book away for a few days. Good work!
It’s amusing and managed to keep my attention. But it’s also a little predictable when you know that Boyne likes drama. The characters are also upsettingly one dimensional. For most, their personality can be summarised in one word. The main character was the most frustrating; I couldn’t find any redeeming qualities whatsoever, which made reading the book feel unrealistic and infuriating. I get that Boyne wants me to hate him, but do it in a smarter way. No one is this horrible.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Sexual content, Alcoholism, and Toxic friendship
Moderate: Death, Rape, and Domestic abuse
Minor: Miscarriage
asourceoffiction's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
One of the things I love most about Boyne's work is his ability to create morally ambiguous characters that still feel sympathetic. But what fascinated me about A Ladder to the Sky is how he turned that so completely on its head. Erich Ackerman is exactly such a character, but it quickly becomes apparent that this is not his story. And in Maurice Swift, there is absolutely nothing redeemable to be found.
In a way every section of the book was predictable. But knowing what would happen actually enhanced the anticipation each time, and Maurice's actions gradually went much further than I could imagine. I'm not sure if I've ever been so physically angry while reading a novel; at one point I genuinely came close to throwing it across the room.
But as hateful as Maurice is (and he takes us to some deliciously dark places), I could not stop reading. The hardest thing with irredeemable characters is how to make you want to keep reading. And the narrative structure helps with this; the first section is Erich's story, and Maurice is the third party. The mid-section is Edith's, and she addresses Maurice in the second person which adds depth. But Maurice does not get to control his own narrative until the very end, which is so fitting to the story he has to tell and to his overall character.
It also helps that it is, inexplicably, funny. Boyne is a master of very, VERY dark humour and this is no exception. I'm not even sure if I should have been laughing. This is an original, imaginative story about a man completely devoid of imagination and original thought, and I absolutely loved it.
In a way every section of the book was predictable. But knowing what would happen actually enhanced the anticipation each time, and Maurice's actions gradually went much further than I could imagine. I'm not sure if I've ever been so physically angry while reading a novel; at one point I genuinely came close to throwing it across the room.
But as hateful as Maurice is (and he takes us to some deliciously dark places), I could not stop reading. The hardest thing with irredeemable characters is how to make you want to keep reading. And the narrative structure helps with this; the first section is Erich's story, and Maurice is the third party. The mid-section is Edith's, and she addresses Maurice in the second person which adds depth. But Maurice does not get to control his own narrative until the very end, which is so fitting to the story he has to tell and to his overall character.
It also helps that it is, inexplicably, funny. Boyne is a master of very, VERY dark humour and this is no exception. I'm not even sure if I should have been laughing. This is an original, imaginative story about a man completely devoid of imagination and original thought, and I absolutely loved it.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Murder
Moderate: Child death, Miscarriage, Suicide, and Alcoholism
serendipitysbooks's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Maurice Swift doesn’t let lack of ideas or talent prevent him achieving his goal of becoming a celebrated author. He simply steal stories and even entire novels from others. Maurice is totally unlikeable - literary plagiarism is the least of his sins - and thoroughly unrepentant. But I was totally absorbed in the novel about him and found it contained plenty of food for thought about current publishing issues.
Content Warnings
Moderate: Murder
Minor: Alcoholism
corinthians666's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Content Warnings
Moderate: Alcoholism and Murder
More...