Reviews

Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West by Gregory Maguire

rhindleby's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

cate_with_a_c's review against another edition

Go to review page

It’s not even that it’s too political, but I will say that the musical is 1000 times better than the book, which somehow was able to make something wonderful out of very shitty source material. 
It takes way too long for the story to actually get going and it’s just rambling. Glinda is a real bitch for a good portion of the book. 
I will not be reading this again I’ve tried reading it twice. 

bexrod's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious medium-paced

4.0

jade_the_book_lover's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

it's a really good book

ciaraohara's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.25

Uhhh ?? Sooooooo not what I was expecting. I was aware that the musical is only loosely based on the book but the vibe is sooooo different, I thought there would be more similarities ? 

The tone really started from me at the very beginning
with the Clock of the Time Dragon, and specifically the first puppet show (with the mother and daughter and the ….. yeah). I did not at all expect it to be so explicit? This really continued after Elphaba goes underground in the Emerald City.
The musical is definitely more PG and suited to a wider audience. 

I
was also extremely surprised at how little Shiz University actually featured in the book. I suppose in the musical it takes up a much larger chunk of the setting, but the book takes place over a wayyyy longer period of time (again, something I did not know)
. I did think that this added a really interesting depth to the book as it really highlighted what kind of place Oz is.
I knew that in Baum’s original Oz books, Oz was a pretty morbid place.
So it lived up to that expectation at least. 

I also fully did expect Elphaba to survive, as in the musical. I really feel unsure about the ending because, on one hand, her death made a lot of sense for the plot and the political turmoil raging in Oz throughout and at the end of the book. On the other hand, the execution felt uncertain, and as though Maguire was trying to tell a whole story before fitting the same ending as the movie. However, I enjoyed that the ending for the Wizard further shows a more complex political environment than shown in the movie or the musical.
 

Overall I just feel a bit taken aback. If you’re going to read the book and already know the movie/musical well, try to go in with no expectations. It’s not the same. At all. I prefer the musical as at least the character motivations and some of the points of political tension actually go somewhere and we get a more complete ending to them. I didn’t feel that every point in the book was executed well. But it was still a fairly interesting read? 

conniebs's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional funny mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

bethanechol's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

This was given to me for my birthday by one miss ElisaB, and I picked it up for the transition back into fiction after my quals. It was pretty enjoyable - suspenseful, captivating, etc., but it still isn't one of my favorites. It's a good deal darker and stranger than the musical (the musical took a great deal of license in the plot, as well), and it involves itself heavily in a long, philosophical and metaphorical back and forth about the nature of evil. This is, I suppose, the point of the book, but to me at least it's muddled and not terribly effective. It's also heavily steeped in disturbing sexual imagery - points for creativity and metaphor, less points for enjoyability.

Anyway, it was an engrossing read for my first 2 weeks of summer, but I wouldn't necessarily recommend it. On to Kurt Vonnegut it is.

copiani's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

satujensiivilla's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark informative mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

2.0