Take a photo of a barcode or cover
dark
reflective
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
you think you made it through the whole thing, this famed russian novel without any antisemitism and then the last 20 pages hit you
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
dark
emotional
lighthearted
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
This was my first read through, and I’ll definitely need more to develop deeper understanding.
Just on a first read, I really connected with the tension between logic and emotion.If you could logically argue the death of someone could be better for society (something many people have thought about someone at one point or another, whether it’s because they hurt you or exploited you or because you believe in the death penalty, either way using logic in some way to justify death), could you still separate yourself emotionally from that?
I think it’s clear Dostoevsky says no—at least, Raskolnikov can’t, nor can Svidrigailov separate himself emotionally from his crimes.
I also think this ties into themes of community and isolation. Part of Raskolnikov’s redemption comes from his love for Sonya. My personal interpretation of Svidrigailov‘s motive for suicide was the realization that he was a monster preying on innocence (manifesting in his guilt laden nightmares) and this ultimately resulted in him losing Dunchenka, who in their final moments seemed to have something approximating a genuine relationship that he seemed truly hurt to lose. Raskolnikov finds salvation through love, Svidrigailov kills himself upon the realization that he’ll ultimately be loveless.
Just on a first read, I really connected with the tension between logic and emotion.
I think it’s clear Dostoevsky says no—at least, Raskolnikov can’t, nor can Svidrigailov separate himself emotionally from his crimes.
I also think this ties into themes of community and isolation. Part of Raskolnikov’s redemption comes from his love for Sonya. My personal interpretation of Svidrigailov‘s motive for suicide was the realization that he was a monster preying on innocence (manifesting in his guilt laden nightmares) and this ultimately resulted in him losing Dunchenka, who in their final moments seemed to have something approximating a genuine relationship that he seemed truly hurt to lose. Raskolnikov finds salvation through love, Svidrigailov kills himself upon the realization that he’ll ultimately be loveless.
slow-paced
Loveable characters:
No
Dostoyevsky did NOT need to do all that
Tooo sooo long to finish despite being one of the more interesting and engaging classics. That being said, some parts of the plot line really dragged on. Interesting to travel back to Russia at the time and compare it to the effects of poverty and egoism now.
challenging
dark
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
Complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
dark
emotional
reflective
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
challenging
dark
reflective
tense