Reviews

Utopia by Thomas More

novelideea's review

Go to review page

slow-paced

1.5

moonvers3's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

3.5

sambora's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging funny hopeful inspiring slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.0

Part science-fiction, part manifesto, part political satire... Utopia was a fascinating read.
I am not quite sure of this book's context in a historical sense, but the text itself was very interesting.

The first half (of this admittedly quite short book) was a bit of a slog for me, and it took a dozen pages or so for me to find my flow with reading the old English of the 1500s.
Once that clicked it made for much smoother reading, and going into the second half, the description and world-building of this Island of Utopia, had me far more engaged.

4 stars

Additional note; the Everyman Library edition of this book is beautiful. Very well put together little hardback

saigealiya's review

Go to review page

2.0

this book was bad and stupid

jakepauler69's review

Go to review page

challenging reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

4.5

caleboh_1's review

Go to review page

challenging slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.0

I hated this. Very quickly skimmed the second half of this book, but but but, discussion of how we progress as a society in section made "reading" worthwhile. 

coppercrane2's review against another edition

Go to review page

reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? N/A
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

thaell's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? N/A
  • Diverse cast of characters? N/A
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A

sinogaze's review

Go to review page

1.0

so mid

khaufnaak's review

Go to review page

1.0

I did not finish this book, I gave up two chapters before the end. I despise this piece of writing. I don’t know how I tried reading this by my own free will, this is the kind of book they make you read in school. The writing style is dry and tedious, meandering and full of monologues. It’s like Thomas More was elucidating his views through some guy just talking non-stop. It’s like a lecture written down. I understand this may have been the writing style of his time, but I simply cannot stand it. I’d rather read Herland.