949 reviews for:

De maniac

Benjamín Labatut

4.28 AVERAGE

medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Fun read but in many ways it felt honestly a bit sensationalistic. Labatut is a very good writer (clearly) so this is an easy book to read and if someone has never heard of Von Neumann or his work, it is probably a good way to gain an interest in him. However, it does not go beyond the surface and at some point it feels repetitive (most of the narrators have very little that distinguishes them from each other in terms of manner of speaking and opinion(s) on the protagonist, which does not help.)
informative inspiring reflective medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
adventurous dark medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes
dark emotional informative reflective tense medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
informative reflective slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Beautiful and sobering, this novel is a triptych about the failure of intellect. Without proposing any protective defense of our other capabilities, three stories convey the collapse of pure reason when pushed to its utmost. There is no moral, but there is a message: staying human in the storm of AI and advanced mathematical thinking is very hard.
dark informative inspiring mysterious reflective fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: Character
Strong character development: Yes
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus: Complicated
challenging informative inspiring tense fast-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: Complicated
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

...von Neumann was asked what it would take for a computer, or some other mechanical entity, to begin to think and behave like a human being... He took a very long time before answering, in a voice that was no louder than a whisper... He said that it would have to grow, not be built... He said that it would have to understand language, to read, to write, to speak... And he said it would have to play, like a child.

labatut uniquely conveys the dark potential of artificial general intelligence (AGI) that looms over the whole of humanity. through the perspective of Lee Sedol, the world's best go player, we get our first hint at the upheaval of fundamental ways of knowing that super-intelligent AGI will unleash upon our hopelessly limited perspectives. AlphaGo, by completely reshaping a domain of thought and strategy encompassing millennia of human thought and experience in a short manner of time, powered by engineers who scarcely understand its own capabilities, is emblematic of the torrential changes to the world under whose currents we will be swiftly swept under.

the world of logic and reason upon which we built our dominance will simply be passed on to more worthy minds, leaving us as helpless and ignorant as a glaze-eyed squirrel in the middle of a busy highway. and nonsensically, in the same vein as the blind push for progress that wrought the destruction of atomic weaponry, we are actually racing towards the facilitation of our own inferiority. equipped with our modern philosophies regarding science, it seems we have no choice but to continue racing towards this point. and all of human creativity and expression, as was in the game of go, will be extinguished.


Most of the book was quite massively boring - all the different first-person perspectives sounded like they came from the same voice, and I didn't care about any of them. The AI stuff at the end was great though.