You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.


I met the author at the Festival of Faith and Writing. Nice guy. The book raises a lot of questions and the answers he offers are mostly "I don't know"-- but at least that's honest!

Summary: A discussion of the difficulties of being a Black Christian in predominately White Christian institutional spaces. 

I met Edward Gilbreath at a Jude3 conference in August 2019, back in the pre-pandemic get together in-person era of conferences. However, I have known of him for a long time. He was a writer for Christianity Today, their first, and for many years only, Black staff person. And I previously read Gilbreath's book on Letter from a Birmingham Jail. I also have known his father-in-law and sister-in-law for years (15-20) through work, and I think we both attended the same church for a while, although I am not sure if we were attending at the same time. That somewhat shared experience and roughly similar ages (he is about 3-4 years older than I am) mean that as I was reading Reconciliation Blues, his story of the differences of experience between Black and White Christians was even more tangible for me.


Gilbreath attended Judson College. I attended Wheaton, not far away. Judson is denominationally affiliated with the American Baptists, and I considered going because I grew up American Baptist, many people I know went there. But by the point Gilbreath entered Judson, he was already conversant in White Evangelical because of his teen youth group experience in a White Evangelical church. The era of the experience does matter. Dante Stewart is roughly 20 years younger than Gilbreath, and their college experiences are different. Stewart was at a large state school, and his White Evangelical experience was through para-church college sports ministry. Gilbreath was at a small, predominately White college on the Evangelical edge of a Mainline denomination. But there was also a lot of experiential overlap. The experiences were similar, but I think some of the expectations were different because the era was different.


The Promise Keeper's style friendship-based racial reconciliation movement may not have peaked until about when Reconciliation Blues came out in 2006, but that culture was common a couple of decades before its publication. The critiques of the individualism of that era's racial reconciliation movement in books like Divided by Faith and the more recent I Bring the Voice of My People and Myth of Colorblind Christians, but the kernel of the critique is still the same. Gilbreath mainly reflects on his experience of college and his early work at Christianity Today and in Christian publishing from roughly 1991 until 2006, a 15 year period that had a lot of feel-good approaches to handling race.


Reconciliation Blues was one of the personal experience memoirs showing that those approaches did not always work. Memoirs like Austin Channing Brown's I'm Still Here and Shoutin' in the Fire came later, but this story of the frustration of Black Christians trying to survive in White Christian spaces is such an old story. It goes at least back to Frederick Douglass' critiques of White Christianity and his leaving William Lloyd Garrison's supervision. WEB DuBois' double consciousness was one of the early sociological explanations of the problem. Memoirs are always about a point in time. Reconciliation Blues is about the 15-year era before Obama's rise and the false idea of post-racial America. It is a reminder of how common and harmful the colorblind theology of the post-Civil Rights era was. And it is a reminder that hearing voices from other generations can help contextualize our current period, especially for people coming to current conversations around race for the first time.


So many issues are the same, politics, individual vs. systemic responses to race and poverty and other social problems, the insular nature of White Evangelicalism, the attacks against directly dealing with race as a type of liberalism or Marxist/Communist thought. It is both encouraging and discouraging to see that there are things that have changed, but that so little fundamentally has changed. It has only been about 15 years since Reconciliation Blues was written, but that 15 years feels much longer in many ways.


This book is 15 years old, so a little dated, but still very apropos. How little has changed in 15 years, sad to say. I found the chapter on politics especially dead on. He could have written it this week. Oh that the church had listened to his message 15 years ago!
I'd love to see Mr Gilbreath update the book and add in a chapter about BLM as well.

I’ve given up on racial reconciliation quite a few times. The first time was shortly after I discovered it due to my inability to sleep peacefully as I grappled with my newfound understanding of ethnocentrism. The second was when my Asian American husband and I left the segregated and monocultural Midwest for the more integrated and diverse landscape of the East Coast (where racism no longer exists, or so we thought…). The third was when the African American pastor of our mostly white urban church resigned, citing racial reasons as one of dynamics that shadowed his pastorate. The fourth and most recent was when we returned to rural Indiana to a landscape of, shall we say, far more (white) milk than (brown) honey. However, it gets a bit tricky to walk out completely on racial reconciliation when you’re married to someone of another race.

Although I am white, I daily face racial issues through my children and husband. While I easily blend into the crowd, they never do, and I am regularly privileged to experience life through their eyes. In his book Reconciliation Blues: a Black Evangelical’s View of Christianity (Intervarsity Press, 2006), Edward Gilbreath offers a similar gift. With painful honesty, he shares his experience of being an African American evangelical Christian in a white dominated church culture. Confronting the majority notion that racism in the church is not a pressing issue, Gilbreath observes that “something is still broken.” He offers examples not only from his own life, but also from other African American Christians who struggle to interact with and trust white evangelicals. While he concedes that the church has come a long way from the days of slavery, segregation and lynching, he still questions if we have come far enough, citing the lack of diversity in many Christian organization, and the white majority’s unwillingness to genuninely submit to leaders from other cultures.

Gilbreath begins by describing his experience being the only black person in many evangelical Christian institutions and organizations. He speaks candidly of how he is often expected to speak for his entire race, and to ‘give in’ to the white majority’s unacknowledged ignorance of other cultures. “Many days the weight of it all leaves me exasperated,” he writes. “Sometimes in the silent thumping of my heart, I am haunted by the thought that I will always carry the mantle alone – terrified by the realization that, on a daily basis, if I do not speak up to voice a nonwhite perspective, it will go unheard.”

In addition to sharing about his personal experience, he offers portraits of other publically known black Christians such as Tom Skinner, Martin Luther King, Jr., and (gasp!) Jesse Jackson. Offering a fair treatment of each figure, he shows how their influence has both affected and been received by a white evangelical audience. He even explores how hot-button issues like political associations and cultural over-generalizations effect race relations within the church.

While a powerful read for those already in the throes of the reconciliation movement, I would also highly recommend Reconciliation Blues for those who have not yet entered. While the issue of racism – especially in the church - is never an easy one, Gilbreath addresses the issue much with gentleness and grace. His vulnerability is a sigh of relief for other nonwhite believers who share his experience of isolation, and a challenge to those of us who too often forget how much we have to learn.

Read the full review here: http://newberyandbeyond.com/an-exploration-of-christian-books/

Good read. The book was published in 2006 so some points are kinda dated. It would be interesting to see an updated point of view.
ellenauer's profile picture

ellenauer's review

4.0

Though this book is 15 years old, it is still very relevant in addressing the Church's complicity in racial reconciliation. Evangelical Christianity has become synonymous with Conservative politics, and Gilbreath very graciously calls out the hypocrisy in uniting politics and Christianity, because Christ has called us to a completely "other" way of life. He challenges Evangelical readers to consider whether they're following Christ in the Bible or cultural and political saviors veiled as "what Jesus would do."

northeastbookworm's review

5.0

This is a heartfelt examination of a continuing problem in many, if not, most churches. 50 years after the civil rights movement Sunday morning still remains the most segregated hour. This problem goes both ways, in regards to race, and the fact that it is still an issue is keeping the modern American evangelical church from being salt and light in this country. The salt has lost its flavor and is in danger of being thrown out.