Reviews with content warning for Racial slurs - The Gentleman's Guide to Vice and Virtue

violence, child abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, forced institutionalization, murder, slavery, trafficking, racism, homophobia, misogyny, sexism, panic attacks/disorders, blood, injury/injury detail, medical content, chronic illness, vomit, alcohol

REPRESENTATION

bisexual MC, mixed-race (Black) gay LI with epilepsy

REVIEW

The Gentleman’s Guide to Vice and Virtue was a refreshing, fun and surprising read. I was expecting just a light-hearted queer historical romance, but I got, on top of that, an adventurous book with more depth than I imagined.

Switching things up and starting with the ending, let me just say: I loved the author’s note at the end of the book. The author explains some of her research and clarifies what parts of the book are very much inspired by what is actually known about eighteenth-century Europe (the setting of the book). I thought it was such a powerful way to help the reader learn from the story and turn the novel into more than just a cute romance.

Among the topics that are covered throughout the book (and some in the author’s note), we have queerness culture, race relations, epilepsy, misogyny, child abuse, politics and piracy; all really important and/or really interesting subjects that add layers to this great YA romance.

As for the main plot, it is not your typical (historical) romance. It is filled with adventure and mystery and it even has a fantastical side to it, which was something that I completely loved. It all provided the perfect set-up for me to see the characters grow (and grow on me), especially Monty, while keeping me invested in the story.

I’m not a big fan of friends to lovers, but this book was proof that when something is well done, it doesn’t matter if you’re not a big fan of the genre or the trope: it can still get you! Seeing Monty’s and Percy’s relationship grow as they learn how to love was just marvellous. For me, it was just a shame that we had to see a bit of the miscommunication trope (not my favourite), although I do think that it came to show the extra lack of confidence that can be felt in expressing your feelings in the case of queer relationships.

While it didn’t completely blow me away, The Gentleman’s Guide to Vice and Virtue was a solid 4-stars that found its way to my heart. And since Felicity was my favourite character, I’m very much curious to see how the author has approached misogyny and asexuality in the second book of the series, where she takes the lead.

Content Warnings

captainhopps's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Content Warnings

a_bloom's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny hopeful informative inspiring reflective tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

The writing is absolutely PHENOMENAL and so freaky funny. It's also heart reaching, but you can always kinda see it coming. It's technically a long book but something you could get through in a couple of days.

<Spoiler>It also talks about a lot of interesting topics that were seen as taboo (although some of them aren't brought to a whole lot of detail considering the whole book is told from the perspective of a traumatized white teen boy who's an Earls son... But he slowly starts to learn, grow, and mature as he keeps ALMOST DYING.

Content Warnings

royalmilktea's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Content Warnings

kaii's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny hopeful tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

rotfaced's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous emotional funny lighthearted medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

A few things, before I dive in: I got this as an audiobook, which I think affected my review in positive and negative ways.

Positives first: The writing style is very whimsical and engaging, made more-so by the expert narration. It was truly enjoyable, listening to this book, and for a brief two weeks it made my long commute more bearable. The author really has a way of twisting internal dialog to contribute to a scene rather than to detract from it, and the narration capitalized wonderfully on this style to provide an animated audio experience. The characters themselves were engaging-- the sister, Felicity, especially-- and the plot really felt like it was taking us on an adventure. I sometimes had no idea what to expect from it.

On the subject of Felicity, I think she's a much more compelling character than her brother and I'm glad to get a second book in her perspective. She was a breakout right away. I love her defiance, her knowledge, her demeanor. She was well and truly the star of many of the scenes she participated in. What a great voice.

Now for the criticism. Warning: Spoilers ahead!

Monty, the main character, is fun to follow-- at first. His antics and bad behavior kick the plot of spectacularly, and the messes they get in are fun and compelling to follow, at first. But then it gets old very, very quickly.

This man literally never stops fucking up. He's a lecherous clown. He has no meaningful growth-- any internal dialog he has is kept private and exacerbates his miserable, selfish perspective. He rarely apologizes. He defies reasonable authority for no other reason except that it seems like the author needs a contrived reason to move the plot along in another disastrously ill-executed direction. I literally had to skip some scenes because they were SO painful to listen to. Monty is a total buffoon, and I really came to despise his selfishness over the course of the book-- especially because it's rarely ever actually, meaningfully dealt with. Sure, he has a few spats here and there with people he cares about, but none of it matters! They forgive him in the end anyways! And somehow this resolves in him being a better person in the last couple of pages of the book. It's maddening, and it's made worse by the allowances given him by Percy

and Scipio

.

Percy exists, primarily, to be Monty's romantic fixation and source of tumult. I actually liked Percy when his personality wasn't being defined and modified by Monty's dramatic interior monologue, but I think the thing that really kills his character is the fact that he... never holds Monty accountable. Monty steals, cheats, lies, wastes their money, gets blasted,

has them arrested, nearly dies-- twice!--

and overall drives the plot purely through his inability to contend with his own behavior. I cannot imagine what Percy must see in Monty, who does nothing but make life worse for the both of them, and it's never really touched on. I would have loved to see Percy's perspective even for a bit of the book. More, I would have loved to see Percy stand up for himself more often. I would love to have seen Percy actually deny Monty refuge in his comfort.

Scipio and his pirate crew are also

more or less just plot devices. Scipio spends so much of his screen time acting as yet another person who comforts Monty, tries to convince him of his worth, and then refuses to hold him accountable for his bad behavior.

It seems like every 'good' character exists for the sole purpose of propping up Monty and cleaning up his messes with almost no recompense.

(As an aside, I only found out after finishing the book and beginning the sequel that the author has been repeatedly smug, rude, entitled, etc. but that's neither here nor there. Probably.)

The only exception to this is Felicity, who regularly needles her brother but has no control or power over him. She is often

literally fixing his wounds and cleaning up his messes,

but at least she seems properly put-out about it. However, in line with the perspective of good versus bad, the author apparently felt the need to have Felicity voice

her disgust and lack of understanding surrounding the Percy/Monty relationship and homosexuality in general, complete with 'it's a sin' rhetoric

. This came out of nowhere? Why do this except to give Monty just an ounce of moral high ground to a sympathetic audience?

Takeaway: I had enough fun with the book that I didn't stop listening to it, but it's another tick in the box of 'disappointing m/m fiction' for me. I wish the love interests were more than just a pair of arms to hold the protagonist sometimes, and especially here.

Extra .75 points for the narration, though!

Content Warnings

onefineelephant's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny reflective tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

8/10. I wasn't exactly swooning over this book but I did really enjoy it. I like the ending message that we would all be happier if we accepted our own and others' flaws. Monty had to learn to love himself. Felicity was a firecracker. Percy was a gracious love interest. I enjoyed the realistic sibling relationship. I also enjoyed the more tender moments. I'm not a fan of ambiguous endings but I understand why this book needed to have one.

Content Warnings

tezarit's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Content Warnings

More...