Reviews tagging 'Sexual content'

Eynhallow by Tim McGregor

1 review

henrygravesprince's review

Go to review page

dark reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.25

In the interest of full disclosure, this review is specifically regarding a DRC copy of the book from Net Galley, so while I imagine this eBook was pretty close to finalized, some details may have been changed between my copy and the official release.

I feel like this book is best matched to someone interested in literary horror and modern interpretations of the historical gothic—frankly, it feels very A24 “elevated folk horror” to me, very “the VVitch” in its effect. The strongest aspect of this book was the characterization of everyone but
Victor and the Creature
; the different relationships between the characters are lively and genuine, and the cast felt incredibly real. I think the weakest element is the underdevelopment of
the characters lifted from Frankenstein, which feel more archetypal and less raw than they did the original novel.
I also think the cover blurb describing it as a gift to monster lovers everywhere is a little misleading, and I would recommend people not take that comment into account when building expectation for what this book “is”. I think more development of the latter end of the book would have done this a lot of good. I don’t think I would pick up another book by this author, but I’m willing to be swayed to by a compelling premise if it comes.

When it comes to stories that adapt or retell aspects of Frankenstein, I consume it with one particular question in mind: what would Mary think of it? Of course, there is no way I can guarantee how she would or wouldn’t react to something—because of that, the guiding concept in this thought process for me is how much the work understands the original (this is not synonymous with accuracy: adaptation is more complicated than that), and how well-incorporated the author’s personal, unique perspective is into the piece. Mary saw one adaptation of Frankenstein in her lifetime, and by all accounts, she seemed delighted by it: even when critiquing the poor structure of the adaptation in a letter, she showered it with praise. In that regard, I try to follow her lead.

All that being said, what does this mean for my thoughts on Eynhallow? Frankly, this
is an adaptation that
isn’t so much “for me”, but I do think it is incredibly well-written
, and most importantly, I do think it preserves the core of the original novel in a unique way
.
I think Mary would enjoy this, and I think she would respect the clear critiques of the mistreatment of women, especially in the way it seems to be influenced by the political commentary of her mother, proto-feminist Mary Wollstonecraft.
The angle this tale takes is one centered on the mistreatment of women in the domestic sphere, the invisibilization of reproductive labor, and the difficulty for women (and particularly mothers) to escape abusive family situations without the resource of capital.

The reason it doesn’t work perfectly for me, I think, is because when I go to Frankenstein and associated works, what I’m looking for is the theme of othering in the sphere of marginalization of queerness and stigmatized bodies.
This book has a very specific lense on the struggles of an 18th century housewife in the British Isles, and so, while it explores the domestic dimension of gender roles and a bit of gendered othering due to Agnes’s height, it just didn’t hit for me
the way I want, and expect, respectfully adapted Frankenstein-adjacent works to
. I think I’d have liked it more if it weren’t
directly invoking the characters of Frankenstein,
because I’d not have set expectations, but that’s very specific to my personal reading experience.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings
More...