Reviews

Z kostí a inkoustu by Romana Bičíková, Rachel Caine

Only show reviews with written explanations

megareads42's review against another edition

3.0

I usually judge these types of series by how eager I am to run out and grab the next one. The fact that I am not that interested means that this one was just ok for me. I am curious about the story and found the plot to be original and interesting, but I'm just not invested in any of the characters. Some of them feel like caricatures, and I'm just not getting the level of detail in their world to care about their personalities. I do feel like it's building towards something bigger, and by the end I cared a little more, but I see a Big Bad looming and I don't love those. We'll see if I read the next one.

cookiebooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging emotional inspiring slow-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

rumpfie's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Very cool premise. Harry Potter-ish. Liked.

jackslynn's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.0

I hate to be contrary, but I really didn't care for this book at all. For me, giving two stars is being generous. I thought it was really boring. The story was poorly paced and seemed to have no arc. I found myself wondering what the point was because nothing seemed to happen. Usually in these kind of books there is some tyrannical institution that our heroes are rebelling against and trying to overthrow. In this book the heroes didn't even seem to realize there was anything wrong with a system controlling the population's access to information and education. If there's no attempt to right the wrong what's the point of the story. The author also threw in some stuff about a war did nothing but create confusion. What's the war over? Is it related to the library in some way? Unfortunately, we have no idea because she never made any attempt to explain the conflict or relate it to the overall plot (what little plot there was). It was an interruption that made no sense to me and I wondered why she bothered bringing it up.
There were also character issues with the book. They were boring beyond belief. She wrote a series of one-dimensional characters that were defined by one or two character traits and that makes me crazy. For me, there can be no real connection with characters that are so poorly defined. How can I care about characters that only have a shell of a personality? I think part of my disinterest was due to the lack of chemistry between any of the characters. They are supposed to be friends and yet they had no connection whatsoever. The romantic angles felt forced and awkward. There was no heart at all.
The entire book was so blah that I had to struggle to finish it. It felt like "paint-by-numbers" young adult fiction. The idea behind the story may have been unique, but the execution certainly was not. I feel like I have read this same book many times over just in a slightly different form and written by a different author. It's very formulaic despite the unique concept. It was a very disappointing read for me.