Scan barcode
brodego's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0
oreojakesters's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
greatlibraryofalexandra's review
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I'd say for the first half of this book, I was so intrigued by the plotline and the themes: cynicism and sarcasm and irony and brutal irreverence mixed with sharp reflection on the world we live in and storylines so yanked from the headlines that it was both hair-rising and unoriginal in an annoying way. I liked the pace, and the exploration of our growing anxiety and malaise as a nation through the vehicle of a youthful suicide epidemic, juxtaposed against the way the parents struggled continuously to find out the "cause" while ignoring the obvious signs of illness.
The second half...well, there it often just devolved into messiness that didn't really always work for me. It seemed to literally lose the plot, and I found it took on preachy, pretentious "Parable of the Sower" vibes that had me rolling my eyes and starting to skim read - points were made and then repeated to an ad nauseum, and it felt like Hawley had decided (again, halfway through the book) that his readers were idiots, when in the first half he had trusted their intelligence.
It has a lot of the same elements as Eluetheria, Lord of the Flies, The Stand, It, and Parable of the Sower, and my feelings about all of those books run the gamut from love to hate, so this is a solid 3.5 for me, but definitely a highly readable and enjoyable one. It could have made more of an impact on my if it was shorter and subtler, and if it had not fallen into the trap of beating the reader over the head with the metaphor.
weelilbit's review
I'd really like to believe this book has more to offer than a hypersexual Black girl as the only POC in a mental illness retreat and two neo-Republicans raising kids in Brooklyn, but alas... 76 pages in and it's reading like a conservative's wet dream. No thanks.
I'd be very, very curious to see a BIPOC take on this book (or, at least the first 80 or so pages) but wouldn't dare ask any of my own friends to do so because this read as such a hateful piece of prose (and not even well written prose at that!) that I think I'll be waiting a while.
I agree with the other reviewer who said that it felt like someone who wanted to write a book full of slurs just to call it "satire". No.
znorth's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
1.5
Something is happening to teenagers across America, spreading through memes only they can parse.
At the Float Anxiety Abatement Center, in a suburb of Chicago, Simon Oliver is trying to recover from his sister’s tragic passing. He breaks out to join a woman named Louise and a man called The Prophet on a quest as urgent as it is enigmatic. Who lies at the end of the road? A man known as The Wizard, whose past encounter with Louise sparked her own collapse. Their quest becomes a rescue mission when they join up with a man whose sister is being held captive by the Wizard, impregnated and imprisoned in a tower.
Right off the bat, Anthem presents itself as two very different books. The first part reminded me of The Measure by Nikki Erlick. The second seemed similar to The Institute by Stephen King. I was interested to see how the two concepts would work together. The publisher's description does not tell you about the American Civil War that breaks, the massive climate disasters, the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the many points in time when the author breaks to monologue about the state of the world as he sees it. The description fails to give the reader a clear picture of the book.
For the first quarter of the book, there are two main ideas:
- Teenagers are committing suicide because of something supernatural. (A11)
- Teenagers are committing suicide because the world is a mess and they feel that hope is lost.
Anthem throws out those ideas for something else.
For the most part, I enjoyed this book. What ruined it was the random interludes of author's commentary on the state of the world, the overly descriptive violence, and how disjointed this book was. There is an entire section where Hawley stops the book to tell you that he is sorry for how grim the world he made is but that he's just doing his job as the author. The descriptions of gun violence are overly detailed and give description of bullet sizes entering and exiting parts of bodies. Graphic descriptions of viscera, blood, and internal organs after injury. I get that the nation has been thrown into anarchy and that violence is the state of anarchy. Those descriptions were never necessary to the plot.
Surely the characters are this books saving grace right? Not really. The characters are monoliths. Louise is a 15 year-old black girl that grew up in a broken home in a suburb of a large U.S. city. She's a child who has been sexualized by every man around her, so that must become her identity and tool to make her story move forward to its conclusion. Simon is a leaf in the wind being blown from one plot point to the next by whatever apocalyptic tragedy Hawley throws at him. Most of the other characters are hidden behind code names. The only character I liked was Duane, and he had almost little to no impact on the book.
Here's what I say that's positive about Anthem. It's vivid and packed with action. The world is largely believable. All one needs to do is turn on the news to see stories about Right-wing nuts doing god knows what protesting the next thing their supposed to be angry at, or news about wildfires. There is a reflection of anxiety in these pages that is very real and present. If that were the thesis of this novel from the start, I'd rating this higher.
Graphic: Blood, Body horror, Child death, Cursing, Racial slurs, Classism, Self harm, Sexual assault, Suicide, War, Addiction, Drug abuse, Fire/Fire injury, Torture, Trafficking, Violence, Alcohol, Child abuse, Death, Abandonment, Death of parent, Deportation, Forced institutionalization, Physical abuse, Domestic abuse, Panic attacks/disorders, Drug use, Gaslighting, Gore, Gun violence, Homophobia, Injury/Injury detail, Mental illness, Pregnancy, Kidnapping, Pandemic/Epidemic, Pedophilia, Racism, Rape, Fatphobia, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide attempt, and Xenophobia
david_brent's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Graphic: Death of parent, Eating disorder, Murder, Death, Fire/Fire injury, Kidnapping, Panic attacks/disorders, Pedophilia, Forced institutionalization, Gun violence, Pregnancy, Self harm, and Violence
sugarbowl's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
quinndm's review
4.0
This book is about a writer trying to understand life today and trying to comprehend the life he is leaving for his child. And I got to join that journey.
jhoffmann's review
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
2.5
amwatt226's review
4.0