You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

14k reviews for:

Lolita

Vladimir Nabokov

3.79 AVERAGE

challenging dark mysterious tense medium-paced

daniellecopestake92's review against another edition

DID NOT FINISH: 3%

Not for me. Wasn't enjoying it.

3.5 ster denk ik. of toch 4 misschien

ik vond het een ingewikkeld boek. ook omdat het natuurlijk een nogal beladen onderwerp is dus is het een beetje gek om het boek wel leuk te vinden maar dat is ook het goeie eraan. maar ik vond het ook ingewikkeld vanwege het taalgebruik, wat af en toe best ouderwets is aangezien het boek uit 1955 komt, vooral aan het begin en richting het einde was dit zo dus het zou goed kunnen dat ik dingen af en toe gewoon niet zo goed had begrepen
challenging dark emotional sad medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: Complicated
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

4.5/5

I found the Jeremy Irons narration really great.

I was particularly moved by the rare glimpses of sincerity (such as “You see, she had absolutely nowhere else to go.”) skillfully juxtaposed to HH's excuses and justifications (such as the whole nymphet nonsense). Indeed, as one gets used to the self-centered passages that dominate the novel, the occasional depictions of true remorse like the one below are all the more powerful, bringing out an unexpected humanity of HH:

> Alas, I was unable to transcend the simple human fact that whatever spiritual solace I might find, whatever lithophanic eternities might be provided for me, nothing could make my Lolita forget the foul lust I had inflicted upon her. Unless it can be proven to me – to me as I am now, today, with my heart and my beard, and my putrefaction – that in the infinite run it does not matter a jot that a North American girl-child named Dolores Haze had been deprived of her childhood by a maniac, unless this can be proven (and if it can, then life is a joke), I see nothing for the treatment of my misery but the melancholy and very local palliative of articulate art.

HH admits that despite trying to convince himself and the reader that he truly loved Dolores, the fact is that he never really knew her. He was profoundly disinterested with anything but his own pleasure. The passage above reveals that, despite all his previous laughable claims to the contrary (“Sensitive gentlewoman of the jury, I was not even her first lover.”), he is aware of the harm he has done. This understanding and confession remind me of his humanity despite all his faults. I guess it is interesting that even in the midst of this confession of guilt and empathy for his victim, HH again ends up focusing on himself as he is preoccupied with the treatment of his own misery.

I have been meaning to read this book for years and I finally do only to discover it is TOTALLY different than I expected. Not that I really knew what to expect, but still....
challenging dark emotional sad slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Strong character development: No
Loveable characters: No
Diverse cast of characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

I’m glad it’s over. I felt like I *should* read this because it’s talked about a lot and controversial.

I started it ages ago but had to stop because the main character’s point of view was just too disturbing. Started and stopped a few times before finally finishing.

It was interesting to see how he attempted to rationalize and justify his behavior to the reader and himself.

free (thank goodness) on audible.
challenging dark emotional sad medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven: A mix
Loveable characters: No
Flaws of characters a main focus: Yes

this book stunned me even more the second time. a masterpiece.