Reviews

The Way We Live Now by Anthony Trollope

bookishwendy's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Oh, I have so much to say about this and hope I can organize my thoughts soon in a timely manner. I'm torn between giving 3 and 4 stars here, and am trying to figure out why. This turned out to be a surprisingly compelling and easy read. The staunch Victorian stylings struck me as both witty, charming and yet still managed to be off-putting, especially in how all the story threads are tied up at the end. The last 10 - 15 chapters left this modern reader yelling "What? No! Why!?" But on the other hand, I can't fault the writer for portraying how "We Live Now (in the 1870s)" can I? If it had all ended up how I had hoped, it would be "The Way a 21st Century Reader Wants to Think Victorian Women Could Have Lived, Which is Following Their Dreams." But that's not very realistic to the era.

Just a side note: I'm working through the BBC series of "Way We Live Now" and they do a wonderful job. I especially love the streak of crazy that the actress playing Miss Melmotte (I recognized her as Moaning Myrtle) brings to the role. And butler Carson from Downton Abbey is also there as the much maligned Jewish banker Brehgert with the heart of gold. I'm curious to see this version will change the endings in order to please modern audiences, or if they remain true to the book.

bookwarm_220's review against another edition

Go to review page

lighthearted fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

I'm becoming a fan of Victorian literature.  Trollope is a terrific storyteller, the characters are well-drawn and the plot moves quickly forward throughout.  Entertaining and satisfying.  Will read more Trollope.

georgia29's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous funny medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

nick_jenkins's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I would like to read more Trollope to gauge whether my reactions are to this book or to his style and general manner, but I liked this novel far less than I anticipated doing. Partly, I found none of the characters particularly intriguing--even Melmotte--and felt that the social commentary was rather rote. There was very little vitality to the novel: without feeling predetermined, the action somehow never seemed spontaneous either. It made for a very long book.

eric_d_peterson's review against another edition

Go to review page

funny lighthearted relaxing slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

kailey_luminouslibro's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional hopeful reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Corruption and vice are rampant among the upper classes in 1870s London, and the lower classes aren't much better. Lady Carbury schemes to get her son married to the wealthiest heiress in London, Miss Melmotte. It doesn't seem to matter that her son, Sir Felix, is a selfish rascal with no heart. Mr. Melmotte flaunts his wealth and uses it to manipulate his way into politics, throwing lavish parties and befriending dukes. The only two who have some higher morals are Roger Carbury (Lady Carbury's cousin) and Hetta Carbury (Lady Carbury's daughter). They two believe in honesty and chivalry while the rest of society has degenerated into power-hungry, money-mad libertines.

I really love Trollope's writing style. He begins with a boring commonplace scene of everyday life, and gradually builds the tension until you are hanging on every word. He makes the most mundane things into something monumental! Every little gesture of the characters has meaning.
He does tend to draw things out though. This book is certainly long-winded, but there is a satisfaction in all the details as well.

The narration jumps back and forth in time quite a lot, telling what this character was doing from Wednesday morning until Thursday evening, and then jumping back again to Wednesday morning to follow a different character through the same day. I liked that the scenes were arranged topically in this way. It made it easy to follow all the different storylines.

Trollope was a genius in his characterizations. He had a special insight into human nature that really shines in his realistic characters. None of the baddies are all bad; even the worst ones have one or two decent qualities. And none of the good guys are all good; they have their foibles and faults too. It made it so interesting to gradually discover the hidden depths in each character, because there really IS so much there to dive into.

There is one instance of two characters, a man and woman, who are quarrelling; and later his friend tells him, "If you had been unkind she could have forgiven that; but as you were good-natured and she was cross, she can't forgive that." (vol. 1, pg. 432) Isn't that so true of human nature?! If you lost your temper, but the other person took the high road, it's very difficult to swallow your pride and admit you were in the wrong. But if you had both lost your tempers, it would be easier to forgive each other.

There is another place (vol. 1, pg. 442) where Trollope talks about people who act like a doormat, always giving way to others. He says that sometimes it is not that the person is shy or afraid of someone else with a more dominant personality. Sometimes the person is just so soft-hearted that they can't bear to cause anyone else discomfort or pain. They give up their own comfort or their own desires, because they have "an incapability of seeing or even thinking of the troubles of others with equanimity..." Such a great insight into this particular character's personality!

The plot mostly focuses on people swindling each other, grabbing for money or political power, lying about everything, or scheming to get married to someone. Out of all the marriages and engagements in the book (of which there are many), only four people actually wish to get married for love. Everyone else is grasping for money or status and using marriage as the means.

I can't say that I have a favorite character. By the end of the story, I was frustrated with everyone for making dumb choices. Even the good guys are not so smart in all their decisions, and I got annoyed with them at times. But I was never bored! I really cared about each of them and was fascinated with the intricacies of their relationships with each other.

The scope of the plot is colossal. There are so many different groups of people who are all connected by their acquaintances and family, and each action they take ends up affecting everyone through these networks of connections. And at the center of that web of lies is Mr. Melmotte, a colossal character himself.

I enjoyed this classic so much! I adore Trollope's writing and this is definitely one of his best works.

mammajamma's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A very nice free audio book reading is available here:
http://www.archive.org/details/waywelivenow_dl_librivox

I can't say what English aristocracy was really like in the late 19th century, but The Way We Live Now paints an enjoyable picture of titled aristos striving to marry the gauche lesser people who've sullied themselves by getting their hands on some cash (or have they?). Kanye West (creator of the song "Gold Digger") might really get a kick out of this book.

The Way We Live Now is like a soap opera (a soap opera whose characters use the words "comity" and "contumely"), in that myriad characters suffer all kinds of triumphs and defeats over the course of the long story. Trollope doles out just desserts with a large ladle at the end, but I won't ruin the book by saying whether reward and comeuppance go to all the most deserving characters. In fact, I suspect there's some disagreement as to who the most reprehensible characters are, and whether there are any admirable characters at all.

siguirimama's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

shadrachanki's review

Go to review page

challenging reflective slow-paced

4.5

valkyriejmu's review against another edition

Go to review page

It drips with antisemitism and none of the characters are remotely likeable. I decided years ago to never revisit this book and I'm not sure how far I got before I made that decision. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings