Scan barcode
veraann's review against another edition
5.0
What can I say about this book? The story is simple yet complex. It is really more a work of art then a novel. When I first picked it up I thought I would get lost and confused with the story within a story within a story, but it wasn't confusing at all. It was very well set up and very well written. It was not a light read, but it was a fascinating read. I think this story and how the book was put together will stick with me for quite some time.
hailiejackiebrown's review against another edition
4.0
4.5 stars!!!
So fucking good oh my god. Also okay Margaret I see you, creating two opposing storylines to juxtapose the sisters and then intermingling them textually/structurally to symbolise the manner in which their lives and tragedies are forever interconnected by human intervention and a spiritual bond that us only experience through sisterhood.
Also I'm a sucker for a plot in a plot! Sue me!
So fucking good oh my god. Also okay Margaret I see you, creating two opposing storylines to juxtapose the sisters and then intermingling them textually/structurally to symbolise the manner in which their lives and tragedies are forever interconnected by human intervention and a spiritual bond that us only experience through sisterhood.
Also I'm a sucker for a plot in a plot! Sue me!
grahamclements's review against another edition
5.0
The Blind Assassin is three stories in one. One story is of Iris's life as she is shipped off into an arranged marriage to save her father's business. Another story is a novel written by her sister Laura about the infidelities of an unnamed woman and a writer, and the third is a pulp fiction story the writer lover makes up to amuse the woman. It is the story of the Blind Assassin.
Atwood's novel spans many decades, from the 1930's onward. Iris and Laura are daughters of a rich button factory owner whose business is going down hill. The father is manipulated into marrying off Iris to a rival who wants her as a trophy wife. At the begining of the novel we find out that Laura committed suicide at the age of 25, so the reader wants to find out why and what the novel she wrote might reveal about her death.
Atwood's writing is spectacular. Her use of simile has the consistency of wave after wave flowing onto a beach. The plot is full of tension as the narratives of Iris's life story and Laura's novel come together with a slowly revealing twist. Iris's story is told in first person, while Laura's novel is in third person, giving a clue to the authenticity of the two narratives.
In the end, the two main stories come together, while the pulp fiction story seems to be there to emphasis how those with power are ruthless in their application of it, and those without power are helpless to resist. But the Blind Assassin and the sisters try to resist.
The Blind Assassin deservedly won a Booker. It is up there with the other seven novels of Atwood I have read. She is an author I treasure and I look forward to reading all her novels.
Atwood's novel spans many decades, from the 1930's onward. Iris and Laura are daughters of a rich button factory owner whose business is going down hill. The father is manipulated into marrying off Iris to a rival who wants her as a trophy wife. At the begining of the novel we find out that Laura committed suicide at the age of 25, so the reader wants to find out why and what the novel she wrote might reveal about her death.
Atwood's writing is spectacular. Her use of simile has the consistency of wave after wave flowing onto a beach. The plot is full of tension as the narratives of Iris's life story and Laura's novel come together with a slowly revealing twist. Iris's story is told in first person, while Laura's novel is in third person, giving a clue to the authenticity of the two narratives.
In the end, the two main stories come together, while the pulp fiction story seems to be there to emphasis how those with power are ruthless in their application of it, and those without power are helpless to resist. But the Blind Assassin and the sisters try to resist.
The Blind Assassin deservedly won a Booker. It is up there with the other seven novels of Atwood I have read. She is an author I treasure and I look forward to reading all her novels.
carliereadsstuff's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
sidharthvardhan's review against another edition
3.0
*spoilers ahead. Proceed with caution.*
Laura's character was what put life into this book for most part before the big twist in the end blurred it a great deal. Except for that, there were lots of themes - the old feminist theme of bored, depressed wife, the war, the novel within novel, the novel within novel within novel, ee tee cee, ee tee cee. They all were just okay themes with not much special about them except for the old-age-is-no-fun theme which was done really well. That might be why it won the booker. Booker committe really loves old narrators looking back at their disappointing lives - Milkman, Last Orders, The Remains of the day, The Sea and the sea, the sea. I'm sure there are many more.
Still if you are old and think you might die any moment, you won't wait for 600 pages of rambling before letting your secret out. Right? Particularly when you expect your grand daughter to stop and listen. Adolscents just don't have that kind of attention span.
It would have been a 4 star book but the twist did more to spoil the book for me than add anything constructive. Its probably me though. I am a Greek tragedy fan kind of person - I prefer it when characters are so well built over course of book that by the end, you could be able to predict their actions and tragedy that awaits them and are desperately hoping for a twist that you know won't come. There are almost no good shocking plots twists IMO when it comes to literary fiction. The unreliable narrators only work when they have given reasons to be unreliable from very begining or at least by the middle of the book - and in that case they won't shock you because you know not to trust him or her in first place. The 'Ha! gotcha!' endings are worst when it comes to literary fiction. In this case, even after hearing from Iris for the majority of book, I imagined her to be a bit too much of a pushover and then she goes ahead and tells us suddenly she had everyone fooled. I can understand she may have wished to fool people once but why do it on death bed? And if she was capable of cheating, why stick with her marriage at all? Or how it was that she just knew her daughter wasn't fathered by Richard?
Similarly you are forced to rethink about Laura's character because suddenly she isn't a defiant girl but also the victim. To be honest, I did expect Richard to assault her at some time or other - it was too much of a cliche not to be expected but when I didn't see it actually happen for a major part of book, I thought Atwood was avoiding the cliche.
No, she wasn't.
And if you think of other themes, well I don't think there was anything memorable in here about wars. Iris herself admits that Richard's character is badly written, and I agree - both Richard and his sister might have been evil characters from Grimm Brothers' story collection.
Besides old-life-sucks theme, the two sisters theme might be next best thing. Toward the end, Iris wonders whether Laura didn't in fact somehow wrote the book or something to effect. The returning motif which should have made a better book cover would be that picture torn in half - a man and a woman, and a hand of another woman. The intermingling of life of two sisters was an interesting theme or would have been awesome if you didn't grow up while being forced to watch Indian daily soaps on family television while having your dinner.
Imagine a good television version made out of book except with a lot of confused flashbacks at that particular moment where Laura makes the declaration about true authorship of book - raising questions on identities or even something to effect where you are made to wonder whether Laura wasn't in fact a figment of Iris' imagination, a split personality that does what Laura would have wanted to do. Some parts of story could have to be changed but that would have been a 5 star book or movie. Laura was already asking questions as a child which Iris was afraid to, her childish way of looking at things was what Laura would have prefer to have growing up instead of her own rational mind, challenging or refusing to believe in notions which Iris felt forced to accept, Laura being the one to want to hold on to words when it was Iris who was later to become author, Laura being one to talk to the stranger and fall in love with that stranger whom Iris had a cursh on, Laura being the one who wants to and tries to commit suicide being driven by emotions when a more worldy Iris tried to hold on to her and so on - a lady's version of Fighter's club except with less fights and drinking. But I already said 'ladies version'. Even with split personality made into a real sister, it really seemed to be the best theme of Atwood's book - Laura being the Iris that Iris herself wasn't or couldn't be becuase of all the tragedies that feminists used to whine about in bad old days. And I thought Atwood was doing this theme well. Till she went for the twist.
Laura's character was what put life into this book for most part before the big twist in the end blurred it a great deal. Except for that, there were lots of themes - the old feminist theme of bored, depressed wife, the war, the novel within novel, the novel within novel within novel, ee tee cee, ee tee cee. They all were just okay themes with not much special about them except for the old-age-is-no-fun theme which was done really well. That might be why it won the booker. Booker committe really loves old narrators looking back at their disappointing lives - Milkman, Last Orders, The Remains of the day, The Sea and the sea, the sea. I'm sure there are many more.
Still if you are old and think you might die any moment, you won't wait for 600 pages of rambling before letting your secret out. Right? Particularly when you expect your grand daughter to stop and listen. Adolscents just don't have that kind of attention span.
It would have been a 4 star book but the twist did more to spoil the book for me than add anything constructive. Its probably me though. I am a Greek tragedy fan kind of person - I prefer it when characters are so well built over course of book that by the end, you could be able to predict their actions and tragedy that awaits them and are desperately hoping for a twist that you know won't come. There are almost no good shocking plots twists IMO when it comes to literary fiction. The unreliable narrators only work when they have given reasons to be unreliable from very begining or at least by the middle of the book - and in that case they won't shock you because you know not to trust him or her in first place. The 'Ha! gotcha!' endings are worst when it comes to literary fiction. In this case, even after hearing from Iris for the majority of book, I imagined her to be a bit too much of a pushover and then she goes ahead and tells us suddenly she had everyone fooled. I can understand she may have wished to fool people once but why do it on death bed? And if she was capable of cheating, why stick with her marriage at all? Or how it was that she just knew her daughter wasn't fathered by Richard?
Similarly you are forced to rethink about Laura's character because suddenly she isn't a defiant girl but also the victim. To be honest, I did expect Richard to assault her at some time or other - it was too much of a cliche not to be expected but when I didn't see it actually happen for a major part of book, I thought Atwood was avoiding the cliche.
No, she wasn't.
And if you think of other themes, well I don't think there was anything memorable in here about wars. Iris herself admits that Richard's character is badly written, and I agree - both Richard and his sister might have been evil characters from Grimm Brothers' story collection.
Besides old-life-sucks theme, the two sisters theme might be next best thing. Toward the end, Iris wonders whether Laura didn't in fact somehow wrote the book or something to effect. The returning motif which should have made a better book cover would be that picture torn in half - a man and a woman, and a hand of another woman. The intermingling of life of two sisters was an interesting theme or would have been awesome if you didn't grow up while being forced to watch Indian daily soaps on family television while having your dinner.
Imagine a good television version made out of book except with a lot of confused flashbacks at that particular moment where Laura makes the declaration about true authorship of book - raising questions on identities or even something to effect where you are made to wonder whether Laura wasn't in fact a figment of Iris' imagination, a split personality that does what Laura would have wanted to do. Some parts of story could have to be changed but that would have been a 5 star book or movie. Laura was already asking questions as a child which Iris was afraid to, her childish way of looking at things was what Laura would have prefer to have growing up instead of her own rational mind, challenging or refusing to believe in notions which Iris felt forced to accept, Laura being the one to want to hold on to words when it was Iris who was later to become author, Laura being one to talk to the stranger and fall in love with that stranger whom Iris had a cursh on, Laura being the one who wants to and tries to commit suicide being driven by emotions when a more worldy Iris tried to hold on to her and so on - a lady's version of Fighter's club except with less fights and drinking. But I already said 'ladies version'. Even with split personality made into a real sister, it really seemed to be the best theme of Atwood's book - Laura being the Iris that Iris herself wasn't or couldn't be becuase of all the tragedies that feminists used to whine about in bad old days. And I thought Atwood was doing this theme well. Till she went for the twist.
zoe243's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
rhonadarling's review against another edition
dark
emotional
mysterious
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.75
lynnly's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
minabix's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
informative
mysterious
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
krover's review against another edition
4.0
I loved this book. It was a story in a story in a story, but was not hard to keep track of the story lines as they all folded into each other. I must say, from the very beginning the main character Iris eludes to past events that show Iris in a negative light and the tragic story of her sister, Laura. The entire book explains the background leading up to the events, and even the events themselves, but does not tell you WHY the events happen until the very end. I had two theories of what happened, and I was pleased to be correct on both counts.