You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Take a photo of a barcode or cover
3.53 AVERAGE
3.53 AVERAGE
love how carrie just lets money eat her away until she becomes the very man she left. dreisers prose is beautiful, idk why he got critisized for it.
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
No
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Content Warnings
Graphic: Kidnapping
Moderate: Death, Infidelity, Mental illness, Suicidal thoughts, Suicide, Violence, Gaslighting, Classism
Minor: Sexism
emotional
reflective
sad
slow-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Complicated
Loveable characters:
No
Diverse cast of characters:
No
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Sister Carrie is a novel written in 1900 about a country girl moving to the big city - far from glamorous, it takes you through the grim realities, and the line of morality becomes blurred. It was a controversial novel in its day, and it was completely under my radar until I was assigned it in a college course. It's quality.
3/7 - This is a little slow so far, mostly because of the number of words Dreiser uses to say something simple - about three words to every one an author of today would use. The words themselves aren't particularly difficult, it's just that there's a lot of them. The story itself is interesting, though, so will push through all the words. To be continued...
4/7 - Drouet is exactly the kind of man/person I don't like. The kind who puts famous and/or more wealthy people on pedestals. Like, just because they're a famous opera singer or own a department store means they couldn't possibly commit a heinous crime, and if they did there must have been exceedingly understandable extenuating circumstances - they didn't do anything wrong, in fact they did the world a favour when they ran down that little old lady while driving drunk - and their pal the Chief of Police or the mayor will make sure they don't do any time. I really dislike the glorification of famous people just because they're famous, just because of the luck of the draw of being spotted by a talent agent in the local diner or ice skating rink - they're no better than any other person on the street, they just have more money than most other people on the street. Note: My view of Drouet's character may be slightly coloured by a recent Law and Order: Criminal Intent marathon. To be continued...
7/7 - It's funny, what Drieser wrote about Carrie's struggle to get work 114 years ago completely applies to what today's younger generations (makes me sound like I was around when this book was first published) are going through. Their wages don't pay enough to cover rent/mortgage, bills, food, transport, and other bare essentials. Companies aren't looking for inexperienced school/university graduates, they want employees with experience in their chosen industry. But the age old question of how anyone can get experience if no one will hire them and give them the opportunity to gain that experience in the first place, continues to be asked. It's not fair and it's a never-ending circle that's only going to get worse as year after year of highly educated, but inexperienced, uni graduates are forced into basic admin or data entry positions. The country is going to end up with a work force of entry-level workers and no one qualified to manage the more specialised positions - one of the many worrying trends that disturbs me about the direction the country's headed in. To be continued...
Page 91 - I don't know how they did things in 1900, but what Drouet just invited Hurstwood to sounds like some kind of orgy or some other situation that's going to involve the seduction (really should be rape, but I don't think it'll be described as such) of Carrie and her introduction to the world of 'kept women' or mistresses (not necessarily for Drouet's exclusive use). Oh dear! To be continued...
9/7 - I must be dense, for I seemed to have missed the hint, or the spot in the narrative where you're supposed to assume that Drouet and Carrie are now having sex, living together as 'man and wife'. Some pages back, when he first offered her a place to stay, there was mention of him not wanting to hurt Carrie and I took that to mean physically, mentally, and reputationally. That he would keep their relationship platonic, just one friend helping another (not that he wouldn't want more, just that it wouldn't be expected). That's why I wrote what I did about the supposed upcoming seduction of Carrie by Drouet and Hurstwood, I didn't understand that it was assumed that it had already happened. Damn these overly prudish classic books, not saying what they mean, leaving things to the reader's imagination. Now I have to wonder what hasn't been said about Carrie and Hurstwood's relationship, if we're supposed to assume that they're having sex as well. Although, if they are having sex I don't see where they could have realistically fit it in as they've had very little time alone. To be continued...
18/7 - I enjoyed this, but can't really say why. It was quite slow, certainly slower than my normal reading choices; there were no big events and no climatic ending; and none of the main characters were people I wanted to barrack for, for more than a few pages at a time. Carrie had her sympathetic moments, but there were times when I wanted to sit her down and explain the ways of the world or shake some sense into her. I was happy that Carrie finally managed to 'make it' on her own without the help of a man (what I imagine would have been a minor miracle in those days), and almost wanted to say to her "See, you can do it on your own. Drouet and Hurstwood were just dragging you down and holding you back." It was a blessing in disguise that neither of them actually married her.
If you read my reviews regularly you might have read my views on themes and messages within books - that they're not for me and tend to go straight over my head - I just don't see them, unless they're shoved down my throat (and books that do that are another story altogether). So, I don't really know what Dreiser might have been attempting to say with this book, but I did get a feeling of feminine empowerment from Carrie's ability to survive with or without the two men who came into her life. If that's not what Dreiser was trying to say then obviously I wasn't meant to understand it, but I still managed to find enough to interest me and keep me reading (which was a feat in and of itself as at 557 pages this is now the longest book I've read this year).
4/7 - Drouet is exactly the kind of man/person I don't like. The kind who puts famous and/or more wealthy people on pedestals. Like, just because they're a famous opera singer or own a department store means they couldn't possibly commit a heinous crime, and if they did there must have been exceedingly understandable extenuating circumstances - they didn't do anything wrong, in fact they did the world a favour when they ran down that little old lady while driving drunk - and their pal the Chief of Police or the mayor will make sure they don't do any time. I really dislike the glorification of famous people just because they're famous, just because of the luck of the draw of being spotted by a talent agent in the local diner or ice skating rink - they're no better than any other person on the street, they just have more money than most other people on the street. Note: My view of Drouet's character may be slightly coloured by a recent Law and Order: Criminal Intent marathon. To be continued...
7/7 - It's funny, what Drieser wrote about Carrie's struggle to get work 114 years ago completely applies to what today's younger generations (makes me sound like I was around when this book was first published) are going through. Their wages don't pay enough to cover rent/mortgage, bills, food, transport, and other bare essentials. Companies aren't looking for inexperienced school/university graduates, they want employees with experience in their chosen industry. But the age old question of how anyone can get experience if no one will hire them and give them the opportunity to gain that experience in the first place, continues to be asked. It's not fair and it's a never-ending circle that's only going to get worse as year after year of highly educated, but inexperienced, uni graduates are forced into basic admin or data entry positions. The country is going to end up with a work force of entry-level workers and no one qualified to manage the more specialised positions - one of the many worrying trends that disturbs me about the direction the country's headed in. To be continued...
Page 91 - I don't know how they did things in 1900, but what Drouet just invited Hurstwood to sounds like some kind of orgy or some other situation that's going to involve the seduction (really should be rape, but I don't think it'll be described as such) of Carrie and her introduction to the world of 'kept women' or mistresses (not necessarily for Drouet's exclusive use). Oh dear! To be continued...
9/7 - I must be dense, for I seemed to have missed the hint, or the spot in the narrative where you're supposed to assume that Drouet and Carrie are now having sex, living together as 'man and wife'. Some pages back, when he first offered her a place to stay, there was mention of him not wanting to hurt Carrie and I took that to mean physically, mentally, and reputationally. That he would keep their relationship platonic, just one friend helping another (not that he wouldn't want more, just that it wouldn't be expected). That's why I wrote what I did about the supposed upcoming seduction of Carrie by Drouet and Hurstwood, I didn't understand that it was assumed that it had already happened. Damn these overly prudish classic books, not saying what they mean, leaving things to the reader's imagination. Now I have to wonder what hasn't been said about Carrie and Hurstwood's relationship, if we're supposed to assume that they're having sex as well. Although, if they are having sex I don't see where they could have realistically fit it in as they've had very little time alone. To be continued...
18/7 - I enjoyed this, but can't really say why. It was quite slow, certainly slower than my normal reading choices; there were no big events and no climatic ending; and none of the main characters were people I wanted to barrack for, for more than a few pages at a time. Carrie had her sympathetic moments, but there were times when I wanted to sit her down and explain the ways of the world or shake some sense into her. I was happy that Carrie finally managed to 'make it' on her own without the help of a man (what I imagine would have been a minor miracle in those days), and almost wanted to say to her "See, you can do it on your own. Drouet and Hurstwood were just dragging you down and holding you back." It was a blessing in disguise that neither of them actually married her.
If you read my reviews regularly you might have read my views on themes and messages within books - that they're not for me and tend to go straight over my head - I just don't see them, unless they're shoved down my throat (and books that do that are another story altogether). So, I don't really know what Dreiser might have been attempting to say with this book, but I did get a feeling of feminine empowerment from Carrie's ability to survive with or without the two men who came into her life. If that's not what Dreiser was trying to say then obviously I wasn't meant to understand it, but I still managed to find enough to interest me and keep me reading (which was a feat in and of itself as at 557 pages this is now the longest book I've read this year).
Such a strange journey. For a book with a title character, I had thought I would get to know Carrie, her internal struggles, dreams, loves, etc., but she is so passive and spends most of the book saying things such as, "I don't know" and "Perhaps," and it's as if she only exists as a mirror for other characters. Everything that happens to her seems almost accidental or based on her good looks, and her relationship with all the other characters is remote and cold. I was wondering if the author was doing this on purpose, or if the book is just a man's view of what it's like to be a beautiful woman.
I did not dislike the book; I stuck with it for hundreds of pages. But, for me, the best part of the book was the last couple of pages, where I felt a part of Carrie was finally revealed.
I did not dislike the book; I stuck with it for hundreds of pages. But, for me, the best part of the book was the last couple of pages, where I felt a part of Carrie was finally revealed.
Kind of a downer, but thoroughly modern for the time in which it was written. I really loved the moral complexity of all of these characters, how neither the men in Carrie's life nor Carrie herself are totally sympathetic or unsympathetic, but all exist in shades of gray as the world works on them. Feeling like I might go on an early 20th century lit kick after this one.