Reviews tagging 'Sexism'

Norwegian Wood by Haruki Murakami

99 reviews

nonsense's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

matiisanchez's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

jazsever's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

fbarros's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.0

Murakami has a beautiful way with words, making any bad story seem good. 
This book only has death and sex in it, but death is not explored as it should be, and sex is explored too much. 
The main character has nothing going for him, and every time a woman appears in his life, it's only to give him sexual pleasure of some kind. The characters aren't lovable or relatable and are vague even though they seem to talk a lot. 
The two stars are only given because I thoroughly enjoyed the descriptions of places as well as the flow of the plot and the way the author writes.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

bexdot's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

3.5 ⭐️

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

aeterna's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

1.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

tfvh2004's review against another edition

Go to review page

emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

dugfromthedirt's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ritte_e's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

1.5

Only giving this a 1.5* review since the writing style is good (with good translation); unfortunately a very distasteful scene nearly made me drop it. The characterization of the female characters is questionable and prominently unrealistic.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

thomasdj's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

***Spoilers beyond the opening paragraph***

Norwegian Wood is very effective at portraying it’s main message of ‘to keep living’ showing the dangers of dwelling in the past and trying to assign meaning to those past events. Murakami is also a fabulous writer, able to paint vivid images of 60s/70s Japan with immense variety of quotable, poetic mantras. However, the plot of this novel, along with its depiction of women, leaves a lot to be desired.

The plot is perfectly mediocre, Toru (the protagonist) and Naoko (one of two primary love interests) are in love but their love for each other is limited. This is a result of Kizuki (Naoko’s boyfriend and Toru’s best friend) taking his life at 17. Understandably there is a lot of trauma associated with this, essentially forcing their love to be platonic. When it turns sexual, Naoko feels like she is betraying Kizuki and goes to stay in Hostel to recover from her grief. Instead of allowing Naoko the time and space to recover, Toru goes to visit her and writes to her weekly. This is in spite of the fact that he has met another woman. Midori, the antithesis of Naoko is lively, dramatic and opinionated but Toru continues to ignore their burgeoning love and insists on focussing on Naoko. It’s frustrating to read, even though it’s intentionalas one character says “Don’t feel sorry for yourself. Only arseholes do that.”

Expand filter menu Content Warnings