Take a photo of a barcode or cover
emotional
funny
hopeful
mysterious
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Complicated
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Reading this book reminded me of when I first moved to Georgia and a lot of people told me I “had to go to Stone Mountain, it’s so fun! The laser show!”
And when I finally went, it was fun. And the laser show! But it was also a monument to the confederacy?
And like, this book was cute and charming and queer. But. Also. Had hella racial slurs and was kinda problematic?
Yeah.
And when I finally went, it was fun. And the laser show! But it was also a monument to the confederacy?
And like, this book was cute and charming and queer. But. Also. Had hella racial slurs and was kinda problematic?
Yeah.
emotional
funny
hopeful
lighthearted
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism
adventurous
emotional
funny
informative
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
This was both less gay than I was expecting, and more grisly than I was expecting!
I picked this up after watching the film adaptation at a queer cinema event and loving it (s/o WussyVision in Atlanta!)
It seemed to focus less on Ruth and Idgie than the movie did, instead exploring tertiary characters in Whistletown and Big George’s posterity. I loved all of the Dot Weem’s chapters, and I found the Jasper / Artis storylines, and the Smokey Lonesome super interesting.
It was comedic, but there were moments where it dipped into Southern Gothic as well! And how far it veered into the horror genre at times really impressed me.
I did feel uncomfortable with some of the remarks characters made about race in the book, as well as Fannie Flagg’s description of certain characters that felt racially charged. The way she spoke about Naughty Bird in particular bothered me, and I couldn’t help but notice the colorism that came through with her and Artis.
I picked this up after watching the film adaptation at a queer cinema event and loving it (s/o WussyVision in Atlanta!)
It seemed to focus less on Ruth and Idgie than the movie did, instead exploring tertiary characters in Whistletown and Big George’s posterity. I loved all of the Dot Weem’s chapters, and I found the Jasper / Artis storylines, and the Smokey Lonesome super interesting.
It was comedic, but there were moments where it dipped into Southern Gothic as well! And how far it veered into the horror genre at times really impressed me.
I did feel uncomfortable with some of the remarks characters made about race in the book, as well as Fannie Flagg’s description of certain characters that felt racially charged. The way she spoke about Naughty Bird in particular bothered me, and I couldn’t help but notice the colorism that came through with her and Artis.
I always loved the movie and if possible the book is even better!
dark
emotional
funny
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
Character
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Complicated
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
Yes
adventurous
emotional
hopeful
lighthearted
reflective
relaxing
sad
medium-paced
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus:
No
Plot or Character Driven:
A mix
Strong character development:
Yes
Loveable characters:
Yes
Diverse cast of characters:
Yes