Reviews

Everything Under by Daisy Johnson

helen_is's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

nolan00's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

This book's beauty lies in it's writing, lyrical almost, and - to me - this retelling of Oedipus Rex is more iconic than the source material. Striped with themes of dementia and tinged with loss at every turn, "Everything Under" was one of the single most jarring books I've ever read.

The first chapter of my copy is full of underlined phrases and words, and most of my margins are annotated within an inch of their life. I laughed, I cried, and I grieved not only the narrator's mother's memory but also my own grandmother's. The echoes of dementia in the writing were so familiar with was painful, the disease taking my own grandmother's life a few years ago.

5/5 - and I wholly recommend for those wanting to experience loss and cry like it - whatever "it" for you is - happened hours ago.

rosie18's review against another edition

Go to review page

2.75

Is this a beautifully written book? Yes. Can I see why it was shortlisted for the Booker? Absolutely. Did it have a good sense of place? Fabulous. Did I enjoy it? Hmm. I'm really not sure. The first half dragged for me, but I did get into it later. I much preferred Fen, and think that, for me at least, Daisy Johnson's style works much better in short stories.

spookyaz's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark sad fast-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

timna_wyckoff's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Very creative and clever retelling of an old story, but although I generally liked the vibe, the writing was just a little too opaque,and it went on just a little too long for my taste.

kerrin_h's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

getinkshedtears's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

It's not a bad book. I didn't hate it. I wanted to like it. Ostensibly it has a lot of the things I enjoy in a book. But once I realized it's just Oedipus (there may be indications earlier, but for me it was the first mention of a limp), thoughts of OH I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE overwhelmed my reading experience ... also the writeups and the book itself really oversell the whole "they speak their own made-up language" thing, which I was hoping would be deeper. This is not incomprehensible twinspeak; this is a handful of made-up words that rises a level or two above what a lot of families and really anybody who spends too much time together ends up with.

Ultimately I wasn't thrilled by the mythic but well-trod twists and turns, and I'm left wanting to know how the narrator went from uneducated, unsocialized, abandoned teenager with presumably no official record of her existence to cottage-owning lexicographer, something that I assume requires at least a college-level degree. Unless you can walk into the dictionary office and floor everyone by saying "harpiedoodle."

thefloatingbookworm's review against another edition

Go to review page

I can’t concentrate 

angelamichelle's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Good, but not my favorite.

[woman searching for mother who abandoned her on river, Oedipus story]

absolute_bookery's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark emotional mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0

Interesting but feel like it lost its way a couple of times because of how many little things were going on!